Paging all metrics doogs

PostGameOrangeSlices

https://www.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/35375426/college-football-sp+-rankings-bowl-games

This article has a paywall, but it's the updated SP+ football rankings.

Of note...the DAWGS finish #15...behind #11 Oregon...and FUCKING #8 TEXAS

Someone take this stupid ass computer and throw if off the Aurora Bridge.

haie

I took @MetricsConsensus to task earlier this season.

Coaching adjustments don't exist. If a key variable can't be quantified it is ignored entirely.

Invalid.

Delete.

Doogles

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Doogles said:

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

Dude...this dumb ass has Oklahoma at #18. They finished 6-7

RoadDawg55

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Doogles said:

Not enough data points to mean much in college football.

Dude...this dumb ass has Oklahoma at #18. They finished 6-7

I’ve never given a shit about the metrics. I remember in 2014, Florida State went 12-1 and was ranked behind 6-6 Arkansas. A team that had way more talent and made the playoff was somehow worse than Arkansas because they played Alabama to the wire. They are fucking stupid.

Texas at #8 over UW…. 11-2 to 8-5 and the 8-5 team got beat (rather easily). That makes sense.

EsophagealFeces

Metrics are for losers. And fags. Abundance.

Baseman

How do we compare with Clemson? Are we leveling up? Natty in our? future? Is 2024 looking special?