Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kari Lake꞉ ‘We’re BURNING It ALL to the GROUND’!!
Comments
-
Based on what evidence? Use big wordsMelloDawg said:Love this thread. Please keep it going.
But, aw geez, I don’t think folks will like how this ends up. -
If the chain of custody is broken those ballots are not valid.
-
-
Nobody said printer settings weren't changed
Or something -
If they let all this shit slide our nation is indeed finished.
-
The Arizona gubernatorial election was the final straw for you, huh?Sledog said:If they let all this shit slide our nation is indeed finished.
-
https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-wraps-trial-no-clear-evidence-overturn-election-1769172PurpleThrobber said:
Based on what evidence? Use big wordsMelloDawg said:Love this thread. Please keep it going.
But, aw geez, I don’t think folks will like how this ends up.
”Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek that Lake's lawsuit is so "frivolous on its face," he's surprised Thompson didn't dismiss it entirely.
Rahmani said aside from the fact that Lake didn't present any evidence proving intentional printer interference or evidence that ballot chain of custody was violated, "Mere conclusionary allegations aren't enough.”
“…Although Lake promised to unveil bombshell revelations that proved she won the election, evidence presented in the two-day trial was lackluster and didn't appear to meet the standards set by Thompson.
Hmm, based on….no evidence? But tweets from Flag Eagle Patriot News tell the real story, not Newsweek, I know. -
I agree that she isn’t winning this thing, but you and the media claiming that 292k ballots with a huge gap in chain of custody isn’t evidence, is pretty fucking pathetic.MelloDawg said:
https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-wraps-trial-no-clear-evidence-overturn-election-1769172PurpleThrobber said:
Based on what evidence? Use big wordsMelloDawg said:Love this thread. Please keep it going.
But, aw geez, I don’t think folks will like how this ends up.
”Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek that Lake's lawsuit is so "frivolous on its face," he's surprised Thompson didn't dismiss it entirely.
Rahmani said aside from the fact that Lake didn't present any evidence proving intentional printer interference or evidence that ballot chain of custody was violated, "Mere conclusionary allegations aren't enough.”
“…Although Lake promised to unveil bombshell revelations that proved she won the election, evidence presented in the two-day trial was lackluster and didn't appear to meet the standards set by Thompson.
Hmm, based on….no evidence? But tweets from Flag Eagle Patriot News tell the real story, not Newsweek, I know.
-
Butt seriously though, Newsweek isn't a credible neutral source and you know it. In fact it is no more credible than Flag Eagle Patriot News, which you also know. And if you don't, you are either being intentionally obtuse, or you are actually stupid. There is no other choice.MelloDawg said:
https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-wraps-trial-no-clear-evidence-overturn-election-1769172PurpleThrobber said:
Based on what evidence? Use big wordsMelloDawg said:Love this thread. Please keep it going.
But, aw geez, I don’t think folks will like how this ends up.
”Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek that Lake's lawsuit is so "frivolous on its face," he's surprised Thompson didn't dismiss it entirely.
Rahmani said aside from the fact that Lake didn't present any evidence proving intentional printer interference or evidence that ballot chain of custody was violated, "Mere conclusionary allegations aren't enough.”
“…Although Lake promised to unveil bombshell revelations that proved she won the election, evidence presented in the two-day trial was lackluster and didn't appear to meet the standards set by Thompson.
Hmm, based on….no evidence? But tweets from Flag Eagle Patriot News tell the real story, not Newsweek, I know.
As for me, I have known since jump that Kari had no chance of reversing the election. GOP losses have been baked in all over since mail in/ballot harvesting was "legalized." Still if she presents some evidence (and printer guy/gal seems like evidence of something weird to me) then good on her. The only way election security will ever be taken seriously in this country is if you fight. If you just roll over and accept broken water mains in the middle of the night, printers that miraculously can't count in only one district, and loads of mail in ballots with no folds arriving in the trunk of a car then you just allow the same bullshit to continue with no check. Of course Newsweek and others shit all over this stuff. They are invested in the the other team winning. Pravda for a modern democracy. -
I don't know if it was mentioned here yet, but a guy testified that they intentionally mismatched the ballot size (the printers were set for 20" and the card stock was 19). So I was about 90% sure there was foul play. Now it's obvious to everyone except Mello and the lamestream press.
-
The mainstream press coverage is to quote the lawyers defending the election
Case was not proven. Details aren't important -
And the printers were switched to the incompatible format on election day. But testimony isn't evidence ask the Dazzler.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't know if it was mentioned here yet, but a guy testified that they intentionally mismatched the ballot size (the printers were set for 20" and the card stock was 19). So I was about 90% sure there was foul play. Now it's obvious to everyone except Mello and the lamestream press.
-
And the judge who will undoubtedly dismiss the case, I’m sure.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't know if it was mentioned here yet, but a guy testified that they intentionally mismatched the ballot size (the printers were set for 20" and the card stock was 19). So I was about 90% sure there was foul play. Now it's obvious to everyone except Mello and the lamestream press.
Just like…
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3786811-arizona-judge-dismisses-gop-ag-candidates-election-challenge/
