Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sincere question for those here who deal in hypotheticals
Looking back at the 2016 Washington Huskies, would you view that season more favorably if they lost to Alabama in the semifinal Peach Bowl (the reality), or if they had beaten Oklahoma or Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl to finish 13-1?
(Obviously the Sugar Bowl matchup is made up for the sake of discussion)
2 ·
Comments
Would have been a much better finish to the season with a bowl win against a respectable opponent.
HTH
So no, we! wanted Bama and we? got them.
During the season, Clemson won a game against NC State or someone like that where their opponents missed a 15 yard field goal as time expired. Had they made it, UW would have likely played in the championship game as I think we would have beaten that buckeye team.
But, you know, if my uncle had labia majora, he'd be my aunt
SC rose their Rose Bowl win in 2016 to higher levels than our CFP loss (and then quickly fell on their face with the wrong coach). However, SC still doesn’t have a CFP appearance and we do.
Fiesta bowl was the momentum killer, the coaches let the players down. I think our shitty wr coach called plays.
Rose Bowl you knew Pete wasn't capable of beating Urban in a sendoff game.
Otherwise I don't think there's a bowl/non-playoff opponent whom I'd have preferred over the semifinal they earned.
That team should've played in a natty
Instead, they choked at home and drew Bama in Georgia
It is what it is, they got their shot and had one of the best defenses in CFB in the 21st century
For some reason some on here arent okay with a final 4
At the time though? Definitely prefer to play for the championship however unlikely it seems.
They would have played Clemson if they were the 3 seed
I like making the playoffs, either way.