Right, so the medications are to blame, not the crippling and debilitating mental illnesses they're trying to correct? Science must be fucking proud of this moment.
I can't believe how fucking stupid some people are. Do they teach dumb fucks confounding variables in whatever shitty ass liberal-arts school they go to these days?
Right, so the medications are to blame, not the crippling and debilitating mental illnesses they're trying to correct? Science must be fucking proud of this moment.
I can't believe how fucking stupid some people are. Do they teach dumb fucks confounding variables in whatever shitty ass liberal-arts school they go to these days?
Dude do you work for fucking big pharma or something?
Obviously mental illness is the underlying problem. But giving mentally ill people psychotropic meds is only going to make things worse. Little Jimmy just has to say he has trouble focusing on homework (who fucking doesn't?) and he can hop on board the meds train. Let's hope he doesn't have a family history of schizophrenia
There is some truth to the notion that psychotropic drugs drive certain people over the edge. That issue has been there since Listening to Prozac was published. But, it is a commingling of a great many factors, impossible/difficult to test.
But giving mentally ill people psychotropic meds is only going to make things worse.
So all psychotropic medications make everything worse? You want to make sure mentally ill people never take medications? No more antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics for anyone! Mood stabilizers for people with bipolar? How absurd!
Little Jimmy just has to say he has trouble focusing on homework (who fucking doesn't?) and he can hop on board the meds train. Let's hope he doesn't have a family history of schizophrenia
The article is blaming SSRIs, not stimulants. The paper never mentions how long they were on these medications, the doses or other underlying factors that could've participated in these incidences. The article is saying, "oh hey, look, they mentioned they were on this drug and they did this. OBVIOUSLY IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE DRUGS!!!" No, the paper is prematurely blaming the medications without looking at any other factors. There is no background or depth or any relevant information to any case because "person x was on x and killed x people." Yes, there is an increased risk of suicide and violent behavior when kids are put on these medications, but what about their earlier history of suicide and violent behavior or other participating factors? Let's not forget that roughly 30,000,000 Americans are on these medications and many more in Europe and around the world, too.
Also, the article also goes out of its way to blatantly lie, stating:"that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior." Unreported? These medications have some of the most famous black-box warnings there are. Yes, kids that go on these medications have a higher risk of suicide of violent behavior. Patients starting these medications, increasing doses or switching medications need to be properly monitored and evaluated for the first 4 weeks and periodically thereafter. At the earliest sign of these abnormal behaviors or if the medication is not therapeutic, then switch them off.
The article is incredibly narrow-minded and biased. You think a website called Ammoland for grass-roots guns rights is interested in deflecting the blame of school shootings from guns to drugs? Maybe if all these psychotic kids didn't have access to guns or other weapons, the issue would take care of itself.
Right, so the medications are to blame, not the crippling and debilitating mental illnesses they're trying to correct? Science must be fucking proud of this moment.
I can't believe how fucking stupid some people are. Do they teach dumb fucks confounding variables in whatever shitty ass liberal-arts school they go to these days?
Dude do you work for fucking big pharma or something?
Obviously mental illness is the underlying problem. But giving PGOS horse tranquilizers is only going to make things worse. He just has to say he has trouble focusing on poasting (who fucking doesn't?) and he can hop on board the meds train. Let's hope he doesn't have a family history of cooging it up
But giving mentally ill people psychotropic meds is only going to make things worse.
So all psychotropic medications make everything worse? You want to make sure mentally ill people never take medications? No more antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics for anyone! Mood stabilizers for people with bipolar? How absurd!
Little Jimmy just has to say he has trouble focusing on homework (who fucking doesn't?) and he can hop on board the meds train. Let's hope he doesn't have a family history of schizophrenia
The article is blaming SSRIs, not stimulants. The paper never mentions how long they were on these medications, the doses or other underlying factors that could've participated in these incidences. The article is saying, "oh hey, look, they mentioned they were on this drug and they did this. OBVIOUSLY IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE DRUGS!!!" No, the paper is prematurely blaming the medications without looking at any other factors. There is no background or depth or any relevant information to any case because "person x was on x and killed x people." Yes, there is an increased risk of suicide and violent behavior when kids are put on these medications, but what about their earlier history of suicide and violent behavior or other participating factors? Let's not forget that roughly 30,000,000 Americans are on these medications and many more in Europe and around the world, too.
Also, the article also goes out of its way to blatantly lie, stating:"that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior." Unreported? These medications have some of the most famous black-box warnings there are. Yes, kids that go on these medications have a higher risk of suicide of violent behavior. Patients starting these medications, increasing doses or switching medications need to be properly monitored and evaluated for the first 4 weeks and periodically thereafter. At the earliest sign of these abnormal behaviors or if the medication is not therapeutic, then switch them off.
The article is incredibly narrow-minded and biased. You think a website called Ammoland for grass-roots guns rights is interested in deflecting the blame of school shootings from guns to drugs? Maybe if all these psychotic kids didn't have access to guns or other weapons, the issue would take care of itself.
That's it? That's your come back? "OH I DIDN"T READ IT. TOO MANY WORDS" Fuck you you fucking cunt. I didn't expect you to fold like a fucking lawn chair at the slightest hint of an intelligent argument.
You're really are the most pathetic fucking loser on this bored. Congratz.
Comments
Scary shit. "Touched" kids should not have their seratonin levels fucked with
I can't believe how fucking stupid some people are. Do they teach dumb fucks confounding variables in whatever shitty ass liberal-arts school they go to these days?
Dude do you work for fucking big pharma or something?
Obviously mental illness is the underlying problem. But giving mentally ill people psychotropic meds is only going to make things worse. Little Jimmy just has to say he has trouble focusing on homework (who fucking doesn't?) and he can hop on board the meds train. Let's hope he doesn't have a family history of schizophrenia
So all psychotropic medications make everything worse? You want to make sure mentally ill people never take medications? No more antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics for anyone! Mood stabilizers for people with bipolar? How absurd! The article is blaming SSRIs, not stimulants. The paper never mentions how long they were on these medications, the doses or other underlying factors that could've participated in these incidences. The article is saying, "oh hey, look, they mentioned they were on this drug and they did this. OBVIOUSLY IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE DRUGS!!!" No, the paper is prematurely blaming the medications without looking at any other factors. There is no background or depth or any relevant information to any case because "person x was on x and killed x people." Yes, there is an increased risk of suicide and violent behavior when kids are put on these medications, but what about their earlier history of suicide and violent behavior or other participating factors? Let's not forget that roughly 30,000,000 Americans are on these medications and many more in Europe and around the world, too.
Also, the article also goes out of its way to blatantly lie, stating:"that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior." Unreported? These medications have some of the most famous black-box warnings there are. Yes, kids that go on these medications have a higher risk of suicide of violent behavior. Patients starting these medications, increasing doses or switching medications need to be properly monitored and evaluated for the first 4 weeks and periodically thereafter. At the earliest sign of these abnormal behaviors or if the medication is not therapeutic, then switch them off.
The article is incredibly narrow-minded and biased. You think a website called Ammoland for grass-roots guns rights is interested in deflecting the blame of school shootings from guns to drugs? Maybe if all these psychotic kids didn't have access to guns or other weapons, the issue would take care of itself.
And tl, dr
You're really are the most pathetic fucking loser on this bored. Congratz.