Kari Lake tweet this morning
Comments
-
More like 4 points, but still.Kaepsknee said:Hobbs won Maricopa by 20 points.
Even Cougs cry less on Apple Cup Sunday then the folks on here. -
All studies done by the democrats say that. Shocking.AOG said:
Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signatureTurdBomber said:Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.
If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."
Chain of custody verification and protocalls also thrown out the window. Shocking. Those manufactured votes can't be tracked it seems.
Also massive voting machine failures but only in republican precincts. Strange. Huge delays for repubs to vote if at all. Nothing to see here. -
Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.
-
Known Racist chimes in above. 👆🏼Swaye said:I'm surprised any of you keep arguing with Team Prog over this. They will never change their minds. They WANT no chain of custody. They WANT opportunity for fraud. Just like they are trying to change election laws to lets felons and illegals vote, etc. They have no valid reasons for wanting less verification, thus security, in the system. And because their position is indefensible, I mean who could possibly be against one citizen one verifiable vote, they have forced Jim Crow 2.0 into the lexicon. Same as it's always been. If your position has no basis in fairness, but you can't say that, blame racism. The progs here know that all the legislative efforts to loosen vote security are by design, to ensure Dems get elected. And if you complain about it, you must be a racist.
Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to win in this environment, and then when finally in power do not puss out, stand up to the charges of racism, and fix election laws state by state. See DeSantis, Ron, for ways to do that. -
Winners win.46XiJCAB said:Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.
Whole lotta Coogs crying about the refs up in this bitch. -
Benny self-identifies.BennyBeaver said:
Winners win.46XiJCAB said:Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.
Whole lotta Coogs crying about the refs up in this bitch.
Thanks for coming.
$8 please. -
Some know it was crooked but are threatened with arrest...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-county-board-supervisor-says-he-voted-to-certify-election-under-duress_4892251.html -
There's nothing more fiscally responsible than being able to have a process that is easily auditable and required to be fully audited. Can easily keep the costs of audits down by simplifying the entire election process.RaceBannon said:
Probably? So you don't know.AOG said:
Probably because the winning margins don't justify an expensive recount. A recount would only matter if the result was close. It's not. And you can't just suggest there was double counting without some kind of proof.RaceBannon said:
Why do you suppose your team is suing to stop a hand recount?AOG said:
So you have proof of a double-count?46XiJCAB said:
Things ignorant dumbfucks poast on message boards. Just toss it in the box over there, we'll make sure it doesn't get confused with already counted ballots. Oopsie! Issues all across Maricopa county on election day. Just some ink problems. Fuck off.AOG said:
every election has issues. Light printer ink. Get over it.46XiJCAB said:Progs don't care if the voting machines, printers and computers in the largest county in AZ all go tits up on election day. The day most Republican voters vote. Nothing to see here, move along. You fucking losers are so pathetic.
You need proof but there's no reason to look for proof
Got it. Sue to stop a recount because fiscal responsibility
The shit you guys swallow -
Not only fiscally responsible but it ensures an honest election. Unfortunately that violates two core principles of the left.Bob_C said:
There's nothing more fiscally responsible than being able to have a process that is easily auditable and required to be fully audited. Can easily keep the costs of audits down by simplifying the entire election process.RaceBannon said:
Probably? So you don't know.AOG said:
Probably because the winning margins don't justify an expensive recount. A recount would only matter if the result was close. It's not. And you can't just suggest there was double counting without some kind of proof.RaceBannon said:
Why do you suppose your team is suing to stop a hand recount?AOG said:
So you have proof of a double-count?46XiJCAB said:
Things ignorant dumbfucks poast on message boards. Just toss it in the box over there, we'll make sure it doesn't get confused with already counted ballots. Oopsie! Issues all across Maricopa county on election day. Just some ink problems. Fuck off.AOG said:
every election has issues. Light printer ink. Get over it.46XiJCAB said:Progs don't care if the voting machines, printers and computers in the largest county in AZ all go tits up on election day. The day most Republican voters vote. Nothing to see here, move along. You fucking losers are so pathetic.
You need proof but there's no reason to look for proof
Got it. Sue to stop a recount because fiscal responsibility
The shit you guys swallow -
Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.TurdBomber said:
Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.AOG said:
Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signatureTurdBomber said:Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.
If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."
Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.
