Some one help me out here. Why did the P12 switch from a North and South division alignment to a

EwaDawg

jumble of 12 teams?

TheHB

It’s just the next stage of retardation.

RaceBannon

To save Oregon fans from self immolation

Joey

Because they’re dum dums

SpoonieLuv

WoolleyDoog

Hey, North Division champs again. Hang the fucking banner. Maybe it will trigger Criscobal.

godawgst

To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.

LawDawg1

I thought it was to appease USC and UCLA. Regardless, one year in the purpose of putting the top two teams was a standard Pac 12 fail. UW has one less loss, beat the team that Utah lost to in the tiebreaker, and has a higher playoff ranking.

I’d like Vorel and Caple to ask Uw AD what pressure they will put on Pac 12 to fix this shit. Fucking tiebreaker in this scenario should simply be head to head, and if that doesn’t do it, then playoff ranking.

BleachedAnusDawg

godawgst said:

To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.

This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.

LawDawg1

BleachedAnusDawg said:

godawgst said:

To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.

This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.

Then the fucktarded tie breaker should be based on playoff ranking.

DoogieMcDoogerson

LawDawg1 said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

godawgst said:

To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.

This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.

Then the fucktarded tie breaker should be based on playoff ranking.

THIS ^^^^

Or better yet, don't fucking make the change they did. Big 10, SEC run the way the P12 used to. Probably for good reasons.

This conference sucks ass.

haie

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

LawDawg1 said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

godawgst said:

To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.

This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.

Then the fucktarded tie breaker should be based on playoff ranking.

THIS ^^^^

Or better yet, don't fucking make the change they did. Big 10, SEC run the way the P12 used to. Probably for good reasons.

This conference sucks ass.

It's covered in a thread in the refuge where a defeated quook is squirting eggs all over it, but the purpose of changing the rules completely backfired on the conference this year.

Instead of getting a top 10 SC UW royalty matchup before SC leaves the conference, you're getting a boring rematch where Riley is going to run up the score on MWhestingham for the home town cooking that occured in the first game.