Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Yes this is real

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,616 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Were you aware that Schumer and Cocaine Mitch have the same WS donators. BlackRock among them. Chucky says Mitch has the same vision for the GOP Senate that he does. He was just handed the leadership again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,977
    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,616 Founders Club
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Even with Joe Kent, he tweeted this morning that they only counted 2,000 ballots yesterday and its thought there are about 4,000 more ballots but they won't tell him how many or when they'll be finished. What kind of banana republic nonsense is this?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,977
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Elections are audited.

    No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.

    That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,278 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Elections are audited.

    No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.

    That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
    No they aren't.

    They are re-counted.

    A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,977
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Elections are audited.

    No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.

    That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
    No they aren't.

    They are re-counted.

    A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.

    They are sometimes recounted as well.

    You must be the smartest kid in remedial civics!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Elections are audited.

    No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.

    That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
    No they aren't.

    They are re-counted.

    A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.

    They are sometimes recounted as well.

    You must be the smartest kid in remedial civics!
    4 degrees and doesn't know the difference between a count and an audit and calls those who do stupid

    Long live the leftards
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,643 Swaye's Wigwam
    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,278 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes


    Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.
    When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.
    Elections are audited.

    No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.

    That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
    No they aren't.

    They are re-counted.

    A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.

    They are sometimes recounted as well.

    You must be the smartest kid in remedial civics!
    Civics has nothing to do with audits.

    Go ahead and add "audits" to your Russian state narrative homework.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,977
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Bob_C said:

    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.
    Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.

    Well done, Gasbag!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,970 Standard Supporter
    We know in many elections chain of custody requirements are regularly ignored completely in the case of Georgia. If you "find" ballots obviously the chain of custody was broken.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,643 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sledog said:

    We know in many elections chain of custody requirements are regularly ignored completely in the case of Georgia. If you "find" ballots obviously the chain of custody was broken.

    Mail-in ballots aren't going anywhere. Easiest fix to give everyone their mail-in drug, is to stop using the mail, put scanners on drop boxes, scan in ID, then scan ballot, door opens. Post pickup audit that the counts match the scans and the scans match the underlying ballot. Creates an electronic chain of custody and a total ballot universe (with locations) and ensures no ballot harvesting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Bob_C said:

    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.
    Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.

    Well done, Gasbag!
    Speaking of that, how did the whole voter suppressiony, Jim Crow thing go in Georgia? How fucking stupid was that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Bob_C said:

    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.
    Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.

    Well done, Gasbag!
    On cross exam, you would draw out the outright lies and half-truths. You suck at this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Bob_C said:

    The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.

    You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.
    Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.

    Well done, Gasbag!
    Speaking of that, how did the whole voter suppressiony, Jim Crow thing go in Georgia? How fucking stupid was that?
    It was Jim Crow 2.0. So not just Jim Crow. 2.0 is WAY worse. Biggest threat we face actually.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.