Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

If a freak like Fetterman is a US Senator,

245

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,970 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2022

    The talent pool is shit. A retarded fish frog like fetterman will do less damage than a fake tv doctor/celebrity Pollyanna. A dead candidate probably would have won if Pennsylvania was given the choice.
    I’ll take the field and LIPO on fetters lol

    The retard will do what the retard is told to do. Dangerous shit.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited November 2022

    The talent pool is shit. A retarded fish frog like fetterman will do less damage than a fake tv doctor/celebrity Pollyanna. A dead candidate probably would have won if Pennsylvania was given the choice.
    I’ll take the field and LIPO on fetters lol

    They guy on record as saying if he had a magic wand and was able to have one wish granted it would be for the release of convicted murderers across the country serving life sentences?

    But Oz would do more damage?

    When your level of thinking is this fucked up and you believe that the Shawshank Redemption could play out in real life? It tells me that you having a vote in the US Senate is not good for PA or this Country. This shit isn't that hard but a bunch of retards in PA voted for him so maybe it is.

    OK.
  • Ice_HolmvikIce_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    Pretty sure the play is get Fetterman elected and then remove him for incompetence. Then they plug in the rat of choice and keep that senate seat.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited November 2022

    Pretty sure the play is get Fetterman elected and then remove him for incompetence. Then they plug in the rat of choice and keep that senate seat.

    Wifey is getting the seat and she knows it. If fact she has it right now but PA voters are smart enough to figure shit out. She's wearing the Hoodie in the house. Cook it!
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,711 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    MelloDawg said:

    RoadTrip said:

    what does that say about the future of this country?

    Imagine losing to a guy like that.
    It means DIMS are stupid. That’s the only takeaway.
    They’re not the ones who decided to run Dr. Oz.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited November 2022
    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    MelloDawg said:

    RoadTrip said:

    what does that say about the future of this country?

    Imagine losing to a guy like that.
    It means DIMS are stupid. That’s the only takeaway.
    They’re not the ones who decided to run Dr. Oz.
    You pretending like the retards would have voted for an alternative with an R. That's adorable. You're in stellar company Mello.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    Fetterman could have run against anyone

    He couldn't speak in a full sentence and won. OZ or whoever wasn't beating that
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Fetterman could have run against anyone

    He couldn't speak in a full sentence and won. OZ or whoever wasn't beating that

    Reports saying Trump is upset with the wifey for convincing him to back Oz. If you take the wins, you gotta take the losses, Donald.

    That being said, Fetterman has spent two years getting things lined up. He won counties where Joey V. got beat badly. That's not Oz, that's him working long before this election. He said last night it's been a two year process.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,972 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2022

    Fetterman could have run against anyone

    He couldn't speak in a full sentence and won. OZ or whoever wasn't beating that

    True. The second head Fetterman has grown on the back of his neck gave him an unbeatable advantage.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,438
    edited November 2022

    Pretty sure the play is get Fetterman elected and then remove him for incompetence. Then they plug in the rat of choice and keep that senate seat.

    It would actually go to the legislature at that point, which I think is Republican controlled, unless Dems take it this year, which will be the first in a while. Unless Dem's take control of the state House, that strategy wouldn't work as the state legislature would put a moderate conservative in there to replace him.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Fetterman could have run against anyone

    He couldn't speak in a full sentence and won. OZ or whoever wasn't beating that

    Reports saying Trump is upset with the wifey for convincing him to back Oz. If you take the wins, you gotta take the losses, Donald.

    That being said, Fetterman has spent two years getting things lined up. He won counties where Joey V. got beat badly. That's not Oz, that's him working long before this election. He said last night it's been a two year process.
    Jim Ocosta "reporting" that he is hearing reports of Trump in a rage and screaming at everyone

    Just what he is hearing

    Whatever. Next Tuesday he is in or he is out. Sounds like DeSantis doesn't care either way
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,904
    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    Fetterman could have run against anyone

    He couldn't speak in a full sentence and won. OZ or whoever wasn't beating that

    Reports saying Trump is upset with the wifey for convincing him to back Oz. If you take the wins, you gotta take the losses, Donald.

    That being said, Fetterman has spent two years getting things lined up. He won counties where Joey V. got beat badly. That's not Oz, that's him working long before this election. He said last night it's been a two year process.
    Jim Ocosta "reporting" that he is hearing reports of Trump in a rage and screaming at everyone

    Just what he is hearing

    Whatever. Next Tuesday he is in or he is out. Sounds like DeSantis doesn't care either way
    Maggie Haberman the initial source. Take that for what it’s worth.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    So your a no on DeSantis?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    Those ads ran nonstop against Joe Kent and it looks like he may still end up winning WA-03. King Co. was never voting Smiley and the offset outside the Blue fortress of Puget Sound wasn’t enough.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,904

    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    So your a no on DeSantis?
    I think DeSantis is very electable nationally

    What I wonder though is whether the carnage of running a primary in 2024 against Trump is worth it or does he sit out, watch Biden vs Trump II, and continue building that resume in Florida for a 2028 run with far fewer land mines to navigate against
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,252
    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    It's going to be hard to tie DeSantis too closely to Trump. He has been a very successful Gov. with his own list of achievements.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,438
    edited November 2022
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    So your a no on DeSantis?
    I think DeSantis is very electable nationally

    What I wonder though is whether the carnage of running a primary in 2024 against Trump is worth it or does he sit out, watch Biden vs Trump II, and continue building that resume in Florida for a 2028 run with far fewer land mines to navigate against
    I don't think it matters. DeSantis will be the most likeable, polished, and competent rival Trump will have ever faced. The one liners (Sleepy Joe, Lyin' Ted, Little Marco) won't work. He already swung and missed terribly with Ron DeSanctimonious. DeSantis will absolutely obliterate Trump. That might hurt him though, because the heavy Trump followers will not like him made out as a fool, and will lash at the person that does. On the other hand, going toe to toe with Trump and knocking him the fuck out will probably gravitate a shit ton of moderate independents that would likely have voted democrat his way. So taking away democrat votes and netting them should outweigh the loss of Trump extremists as they will just stay home instead of voting for the democrat.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,904
    SFGbob said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    It's going to be hard to tie DeSantis too closely to Trump. He has been a very successful Gov. with his own list of achievements.
    I completely agree on that

    If I was advising DeSantis I’d definitely want to evaluate all angles of Trump putting enough hits on DeSantis to compromise him and/or Trump cannibalizes him with a 3rd party run
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,252

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Tequilla said:

    Top end takeaway tonight should be that Trump’s influence in the GOP should not be public facing (at worst) in any way shape or form

    You can’t leave tonight thinking that Trump is electable in 2024

    I don't entirely agree with you, Goduckies and Grundle. I understand yours and 97% of anyone with an ounce of conservatism in their bones opining on the subject this morning. My only concession on Trump would be he stays relevant from an elder statesman perspective and passes the reigns to DeSantis. But there's not much decorum to Trump so I doubt that's even possible. Cons apparently are always going to lose so why not go down fighting as hard as you can?
    The problem is that you need to run a candidate that (at least publicly) defeats Trump and isn’t part of Trump’s umbrella

    Anybody tied to Trump will just drive the same type of ads that Murray was running on Smiley and those Trump ties have big implications to a material segment of voters
    So your a no on DeSantis?
    I think DeSantis is very electable nationally

    What I wonder though is whether the carnage of running a primary in 2024 against Trump is worth it or does he sit out, watch Biden vs Trump II, and continue building that resume in Florida for a 2028 run with far fewer land mines to navigate against
    I don't think it matters. DeSantis will be the most likeable, polished, and competent rival Trump will have ever faced. The one liners (Sleepy Joe, Lyin' Ted, Little Marco) won't work. He already swung and missed terribly with Ron DeSanctimonious. DeSantis will absolutely obliterate Trump. That might hurt him though, because the heavy Trump followers will not like him made out as a fool, and will lash at the person that does. On the other hand, going toe to toe with Trump and knocking him the fuck out will probably gravitate a shit ton of moderate independents that would likely have voted democrat his way. So taking away democrat votes and netting them, will outweigh the loss of Trump extremists as they will just stay home instead of voting for the democrat.
    Trump's ability to build a colaition and expand his base will never be greater than it is right now. The baggage he carries will never allow him to win another general election. His brand is toxic to too many people in this country.
Sign In or Register to comment.