Obama’s plan to use the military against the American Public...

A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/
Comments
-
-
-
You don't think the Railroad Retirement Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission should have SWAT teams? What kind of domestic terrorist are you?
-
Dug, Libtards don't care about the First Amendment, unless you're talking about what THEY say. Libtards want the rest of us to SHUT THE FUCK UP!DugtheDoog said:You don't think the Railroad Retirement Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission should have SWAT teams? What kind of domestic terrorist are you?
Libtards also don't care about:
The Second Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment (except when it applies to Al Qaeda and the Taliban)
The Seventh Amendment (Fucking Lawyers)
The Ninth Amendment and
The Tenth Amendment.
That's what they mean when they say the Constitution is not a "Perfect" document. -
Caring about the first amendment and wanting you to shut the fuck up are not mutually exclusive.d2d said:
Dug, Libtards don't care about the First Amendment, unless you're talking about what THEY say. Libtards want the rest of us to SHUT THE FUCK UP!DugtheDoog said:You don't think the Railroad Retirement Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission should have SWAT teams? What kind of domestic terrorist are you?
Libtards also don't care about:
The Second Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment (except when it applies to Al Qaeda and the Taliban)
The Seventh Amendment (Fucking Lawyers)
The Ninth Amendment and
The Tenth Amendment.
That's what they mean when they say the Constitution is not a "Perfect" document. -
#staywoke #tinfoil #blackhelicopters
-
Always about the blacks?doogsinparadise said:#blackhelicopters
-
d2d said:
FOUR YEARS AGO, Obama issued a directive to the Pentagon outlining his contingency plan to use the military against the American Public. Anybody in here ever hear of posse comitatus? Apparently your "President" hasn't.
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/
I almost forgot there was a Vietnam, a Kent State or even an Ohio.
If your government wants to get you.... they will.
Same as it ever was. -
@d2d, how in the fuck did this poast (hardy har har) end up in the announcements?
How about I move it for you? And I tell you this in advance to help prevent you from thinking the NSA read this, deleted it and is sending the Post Office SWAT team to your house. -
Reminds me of the time the libtards were saying that bush was going to declare a national emergency and martial because of the war. He was going to suspend the constitution and not leave the presidency after Obama won.d2d said:FOUR YEARS AGO, Obama issued a directive to the Pentagon outlining his contingency plan to use the military against the American Public. Anybody in here ever hear of posse comitatus? Apparently your "President" hasn't.
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/
-
Jesus....
Must. Spend. Less. Time. On. Internet. -
Lather, rinse, repeat.MikeDamone said:
Reminds me of the time the libtards were saying that bush was going to declare a national emergency and martial because of the war. He was going to suspend the constitution and not leave the presidency after Obama won.d2d said:FOUR YEARS AGO, Obama issued a directive to the Pentagon outlining his contingency plan to use the military against the American Public. Anybody in here ever hear of posse comitatus? Apparently your "President" hasn't.
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/ -
Massacre at Wounded Knee says hi.salemcoog said:d2d said:FOUR YEARS AGO, Obama issued a directive to the Pentagon outlining his contingency plan to use the military against the American Public. Anybody in here ever hear of posse comitatus? Apparently your "President" hasn't.
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/
I almost forgot there was a Vietnam, a Kent State or even an Ohio.
If your government wants to get you.... they will.
Same as it ever was.
-
MikeDamone said:
Massacre at Wounded Knee says How.salemcoog said:d2d said:FOUR YEARS AGO, Obama issued a directive to the Pentagon outlining his contingency plan to use the military against the American Public. Anybody in here ever hear of posse comitatus? Apparently your "President" hasn't.
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest. “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
There is a link in the article below to a PDF of the document itself.
Wake the fuck up America.
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/
I almost forgot there was a Vietnam, a Kent State or even an Ohio.
If your government wants to get you.... they will.
Same as it ever was.