Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Supreme Court rules against cheating democrats.
Bendintheriver
Member Posts: 6,048 
in Tug Tavern
Nah, there is no evidence of cheating.
The fix is in everywhere. People need to be diligent and get involved or these rats will do even more damage to our Constitutional and civil rights.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/scotus-rules-for-gop-pennsylvania-mail-in-ballots
The Supreme Court sided with a Republican candidate who lost his bid for judgeship in Pennsylvania, ordering the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to toss out its ruling that allowed the counting of mail-in ballots in the race.
Justices on the high court vacated the 3rd Circuit ruling at the request of David Ritter, who ran in 2021 to be a judge on the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas. He lost to his Democratic rival Zachary Cohen by five votes after 257 absentee ballots without dates on the envelope were counted.
The decision to remand the case does not affect the outcome of the 2021 race.
Pennsylvania law requires voters to write the date on the outer envelope of a mail-in ballot, but the 3rd Circuit sought to curtail that law by holding it would violate a provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which aimed to prevent minor ballot errors from denying someone's right to vote.
But Ritter was successful in his appeal to the high court through his argument that the state's ballot rules help election integrity and deter potential fraudulent actions.
In June, the high court's justices denied Ritter's bid to block the counting of undated ballots. But members of the court's 6-3 Republican-appointed majority, including Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented from that decision.
Alito wrote that the 3rd Circuit decision "could well affect the outcome" of the midterm elections, which are slated for Nov. 8.
“When a mail-in ballot is not counted because it was not filled out correctly, the voter is not denied the right to vote,” Alito wrote. “Rather, that individual’s vote is not counted because he or she did not follow the rules for casting a ballot. Casting a vote, whether by following the directions for using a voting machine or completing a paper ballot, requires compliance with certain rules."
The fix is in everywhere. People need to be diligent and get involved or these rats will do even more damage to our Constitutional and civil rights.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/scotus-rules-for-gop-pennsylvania-mail-in-ballots
The Supreme Court sided with a Republican candidate who lost his bid for judgeship in Pennsylvania, ordering the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to toss out its ruling that allowed the counting of mail-in ballots in the race.
Justices on the high court vacated the 3rd Circuit ruling at the request of David Ritter, who ran in 2021 to be a judge on the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas. He lost to his Democratic rival Zachary Cohen by five votes after 257 absentee ballots without dates on the envelope were counted.
The decision to remand the case does not affect the outcome of the 2021 race.
Pennsylvania law requires voters to write the date on the outer envelope of a mail-in ballot, but the 3rd Circuit sought to curtail that law by holding it would violate a provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which aimed to prevent minor ballot errors from denying someone's right to vote.
But Ritter was successful in his appeal to the high court through his argument that the state's ballot rules help election integrity and deter potential fraudulent actions.
In June, the high court's justices denied Ritter's bid to block the counting of undated ballots. But members of the court's 6-3 Republican-appointed majority, including Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented from that decision.
Alito wrote that the 3rd Circuit decision "could well affect the outcome" of the midterm elections, which are slated for Nov. 8.
“When a mail-in ballot is not counted because it was not filled out correctly, the voter is not denied the right to vote,” Alito wrote. “Rather, that individual’s vote is not counted because he or she did not follow the rules for casting a ballot. Casting a vote, whether by following the directions for using a voting machine or completing a paper ballot, requires compliance with certain rules."
Comments
Gee, following the rules is pretty much the definition of system white institutional racism. It's like pulling over drivers for expired tags. Definitely racist.