Remember when

UW_Doog_Bot

We all wanted Jake haener back? Lulz.

PineapplePirate

I’m doogin so hard right now. College football has sucked donkey balls since we? got COVID.

PurpleBaze

Haener, Haener... Looking crisp.

@puppylove_sugarsteel

backthepack

I was always Team Penix.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

never wanted him back

whatshouldicareabout

I wanted Haener and Penix

whynotboth.gif

UW_Doog_Bot

whatshouldicareabout said:

I wanted Haener and Penix

whynotboth.gif

This, depth, haener is done for the year is what I am hearing though.

RoadDawg55

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

MikeDamone

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

RoadDawg55

That’s not my point Damone. Guys are often wide open. The coaching is good. The players are confident.

You can make fun of people for dooging. You should also get made fun of for a take like 5-7 isn’t out of the question. I expected to win and we did. I’ve been predicting 8-9 wins.

Penix was a pretty good QB at Indiana but he wasn’t playing at this level. Maybe coaching has played a role? Are the OL and WR’s not drastically better?

lThere are a lot of things to clean up. I don’t expect Penix and the WR’s to play this good every week, but i think the defense will improve and that the goal line issues won’t be a continuous issue.

DerekJohnson

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

One of the big examples of DeBoer's influence is we're making very few boneheaded plays and penalties. Three games in a row.

MikeDamone

DerekJohnson said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

One of the big examples of DeBoer's influence is we're making very few boneheaded plays and penalties. Three games in a row.

How many unsportsmanlike penalties yesterday? At some point those matter.

DerekJohnson

MikeDamone said:

DerekJohnson said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

One of the big examples of DeBoer's influence is we're making very few boneheaded plays and penalties. Three games in a row.

How many unsportsmanlike penalties yesterday? At some point those matter.

We had one. You're acting like we've had a rash of them.

DerekJohnson

UW_Doog_Bot said:

We all wanted Jake haener back? Lulz.

I was in the minority of wanting him back. By no means was it all on here.

MikeDamone

RoadDawg55 said:

That’s not my point Damone. Guys are often wide open. The coaching is good. The players are confident.

You can make fun of people for dooging. You should also get made fun of for a take like 5-7 isn’t out of the question. I expected to win and we did. I’ve been predicting 8-9 wins.

Penix was a pretty good QB at Indiana but he wasn’t playing at this level. Maybe coaching has played a role? Are the OL and WR’s not drastically better?

lThere are a lot of things to clean up. I don’t expect Penix and the WR’s to play this good every week, but i think the defense will improve and that the goal line issues won’t be a continuous issue.

How did anything I posted about players and coaches deviate from your point?

The consensus here has been the season goes how Penix goes. Has it not? My question is valid. Reread my post. But slowly this time.

There has been a lot of 8-9 wins "if Penix stays healthy" talk. Why the caveat? Is Penix goes down the first series of Stanford, what would be your prediction with Morris/Huard at QB?

AtomicDawg

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

Penix has always been pretty good when DeBoer was coaching him. When they’ve been separated he has not played as well. It is well documented. They even highlighted in the broadcast. RgIII is pretty dialed in on this one.

The reason the win total drops without penix is the qb’s behind him cannot make the same throws.

Should be 8-9 with penix. More like 6 or 7 without.

MikeDamone

AtomicDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

Penix has always been pretty good when DeBoer was coaching him. When they’ve been separated he has not played as well. It is well documented. They even highlighted in the broadcast. RgIII is pretty dialed in on this one.

The reason the win total drops without penix is the qb’s behind him cannot make the same throws.

Should be 8-9 with penix. More like 6 or 7 without.

So Penix is worth 2 games over Morris/Huard. Mediocre with Penix, extra mediocre without. I can see the reason for the dooging. Makes sense now. DAWG sense.

FireTheJanitor

Is the argument that we aren’t sure whether DeBoer/Grubb early success is legit because of Penix? The guy they created? The guy from Tampa that had to go to fucking Indiana? What is going on here.

The biggest questions on team are all issues that predate them. Our mastermind DB Guru fuckwad left an empty cupboard and our 2 QBs left behind both suck. Of course if the guy they made good gets hurt we’re going to be worse off with Morris who fucking sucks. Would be unfortunate if it happens but have a hard time indicting DeBoer/Grubb because Morris and Huard got fucking ruined by the worst staff in UW history.

backthepack

MikeDamone said:

DerekJohnson said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Haener would do well, but Penix is special in this offense.

The big Q is it Penix or DeBonef/Grubb. Good players can cover for shitty coaches and good coaches can win with less than the best players. Maybe abundance? But hopefully it's at least good solid coaching. That's the foundation that will win championships. The talent will be there if the coaching is. Tying on big dock transfers is the Oregon model and not a good formula for sustained success. Would we? be 3-0 with 5 star Huard at QB? If not, how good is DeBoner?

The answer is right now we don't know. We see the running game struggles. Why?

And I'll give a preemptive fuck off to the "we beat sparty, can't you just not say anything other than Penix for Heisman and DeBoer for coach of the year and ignore everything else" crowd.

One of the big examples of DeBoer's influence is we're making very few boneheaded plays and penalties. Three games in a row.

How many unsportsmanlike penalties yesterday? At some point those matter.

We had one when we were up 39-14 and Voi was smoking weed talking shit.

UW_Doog_Bot

DerekJohnson said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

We all wanted Jake haener back? Lulz.

I was in the minority of wanting him back. By no means was it all on here.

You are getting in the way of the narrative...

DerekJohnson

UW_Doog_Bot said:

DerekJohnson said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

We all wanted Jake haener back? Lulz.

I was in the minority of wanting him back. By no means was it all on here.

You are getting in the way of the narrative...

Well I just remember many people arguing with me from day 1 about Haener