Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What society?
WestlinnDuck
Member Posts: 17,658 
in Tug Tavern
Well, I would say a free and independent citizenry of the United States of America would. Leftards have no problem arming the police with 17 bullet Glock magazines and 30 bullet AR-15 magazines. Apparently, cops need “assault” rifles and high capacity pistol magazines to protect themselves from violent criminals. But the peasants? Nope.
I would say a nation that has a Second Amendment would. I would say that some Venezuelan citizens might appreciate an AR-15 about right now. Make no mistake, Kameltoe and the rest of the leftards running for president don’t give a sh*t about the kids. If they did, Giuliani would be revered by the left for all the kids he saved in NYC. This is all about what every leftard government on the planet wants – a disarmed citizenry.
https://hotair.com/archives/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-kind-civil-society-tolerates-assault-weapons-peoples-hands/
More Kamala Harris: What kind of civil society tolerates “assault weapons” in the people’s hands?
AllahpunditPosted at 11:21 am on January 29, 2019
I would say a nation that has a Second Amendment would. I would say that some Venezuelan citizens might appreciate an AR-15 about right now. Make no mistake, Kameltoe and the rest of the leftards running for president don’t give a sh*t about the kids. If they did, Giuliani would be revered by the left for all the kids he saved in NYC. This is all about what every leftard government on the planet wants – a disarmed citizenry.
https://hotair.com/archives/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-kind-civil-society-tolerates-assault-weapons-peoples-hands/
More Kamala Harris: What kind of civil society tolerates “assault weapons” in the people’s hands?
AllahpunditPosted at 11:21 am on January 29, 2019
Comments
-
Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
-
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
-
I have no idea. I concur with you that we may want stricter regulations than those that have been proposed.
-
If gun confiscation wasn't like oxygen to a leftard, you may have a point.
-
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
-
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
-
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
-
I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.
-
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
Censor violent movies and TV showsHHusky said:
I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.
Censor video games
Keep children off of social media
I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING -
I propose secure gun lock boxes and locking ammo up separately. It reduces gun violence by something ridiculous like 80%. I'm even willing to bend the knee to the state in this instance and allow purchases of such safety devices to be tax exempt in the name of public safety.
-
There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.RaceBannon said:
Censor violent movies and TV showsHHusky said:
I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.
Censor video games
Keep children off of social media
I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING -
So you support the Bill of Rights then?HHusky said:
There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.RaceBannon said:
Censor violent movies and TV showsHHusky said:
I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.
Censor video games
Keep children off of social media
I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING -
I support the first and second amendmentsHHusky said:
There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.RaceBannon said:
Censor violent movies and TV showsHHusky said:
I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.
Censor video games
Keep children off of social media
I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING
Sorry you missed that obvious point
We need to get rid of guns but lets not worry about what turns kids to killers. Because we basically can't
That's freedom. No school shootings in the old Soviet Union -
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
Carefulgreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
Hondo has a single mother -
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
Stopping violence involves stopping people and there are not easy one size answers
Except grabbing guns apparently
Which is also forbidden
A lot of people should be locked up in a mental ward but you get one free mass killing before you can
Again the constitution and shit. Freedom
But America would never become a dictatorship. -
Costs money. Is the Second Amendment uber alles gang on board?greenblood said:
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
What's wrong with my plan which has actual correlated evidence(komo4buttfucker)? Too simple? Not enough statism? You could even convince me to go so far as to have a "free gun and ammo (stored separately) lock box" program like the "gun buyback" programs of yore.HHusky said:
Costs money. Is the Second Amendment uber alles gang on board?greenblood said:
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
I've supported family missions for 40 years while not dodging my taxes like you do. If I see something that works I'm not afraid to write a checkHHusky said:
Costs money. Is the Second Amendment uber alles gang on board?greenblood said:
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
If you want the government involved fine. As long as we can still do gender assignment surgery for convicted felons. You know the important stuff we spend money on now -
As we know, MikeD dodged his taxes. Good for you for not doing it. I haven't either.RaceBannon said:
I've supported family missions for 40 years while not dodging my taxes like you do. If I see something that works I'm not afraid to write a checkHHusky said:
Costs money. Is the Second Amendment uber alles gang on board?greenblood said:
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
If you want the government involved fine. As long as we can still do gender assignment surgery for convicted felons. You know the important stuff we spend money on now
I write a lot of checks to various causes. I still want the government involved. I'm even willing to tell felons they have to finance their own gender reassignment surgery if that gets it done. -
See we can agree
-
I don't mind paying taxes if it's for something that actually works.HHusky said:
Costs money. Is the Second Amendment uber alles gang on board?greenblood said:
I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.HHusky said:
Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You agreenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.
There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.SFGbob said:
I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.greenblood said:
Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.HHusky said:
So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?greenblood said:
Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids. -
Then why has violent crime gone down so much even though far more guns are in the hands of the people?HHusky said:
Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?HHusky said:Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?
You have no facts only emotion. The second amendment is not about hunting. It's about preventing and resisting tyranny of government.
That's why the left wants them so bad. No socialism/communism with an armed population.
You want to reduce gun crime? Keep criminals in prison. Deport the illegals. Stop a welfare system that rewards fatherless homes. Hold people accountable for their actions.
