Finally we get to the truth
Running for office and successfully influencing voters to vote for you is now a crime
If you're Trump and you beat Hillary
Comments
-
Shocking you didn't provide the link. Come up with an original thought Race.
-
Do you have even the slightest idea that numerous people are rolling on the floor laughing AT you right now?2001400ex said:Shocking you didn't provide the link. Come up with an original thought Race.
Funniest thing I've seen here in some time. -
The conspiratorial mind of senile right wingers is fascinating to watch in real time
-
Nancy Pelosi is a right winger?MariotaTheGawd said:The conspiratorial mind of senile right wingers is fascinating to watch in real time
Link? -
Got it!2001400ex said:
-
Raw video?MikeDamone said: -
Dementia is very sadRaceBannon said:
Nancy Pelosi is a right winger?MariotaTheGawd said:The conspiratorial mind of senile right wingers is fascinating to watch in real time
Link? -
That's your excuse for your embarrassing performance here?MariotaTheGawd said:
Dementia is very sadRaceBannon said:
Nancy Pelosi is a right winger?MariotaTheGawd said:The conspiratorial mind of senile right wingers is fascinating to watch in real time
Link? -
Maybe he was just informing us of what the Iraqis think2001400ex said:Shocking you didn't provide the link. Come up with an original thought Race.
-
It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
-
Thank you for adding context and reinforcing Races point
-
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
It's almost like she ignores shit she doesn't want to see/believe.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
1. Your graph states there were only 2 Clinton administration indictments. Since we know that’s bullshit, it follows that the rest of the meme is bullshit.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off. -
1) that's not my graph.USMChawk said:
1. Your graph states there were only 2 Clinton administration indictments. Since we know that’s bullshit, it follows that the rest of the meme is bullshit.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off.
2) it's not a graph, it's a table.
3) read the heading of it. It says executive branch. No one is saying the investigation under Clinton didn't produce anything or that Clinton was clean. It just wasn't his executive branch.
4) your better argument, is to say it's lying with stats by only including executive branch.
5) I do have an appreciation for providing links to support your point. But I do chuckle when the link in your first point was just as partisan as the source in the second point that you bash for being partisan.
6) you hate facts. -
You posted it
-
Baphomet posted it, Hondo’s just defending it. But it’s not his...
-
First of all I'd love to see the source for the numbers it cites. It's obvious that they are counting Manafort and Cohen and Papadopoulos who were never part of any "executive branch."2001400ex said:
1) that's not my graph.USMChawk said:
1. Your graph states there were only 2 Clinton administration indictments. Since we know that’s bullshit, it follows that the rest of the meme is bullshit.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off.
2) it's not a graph, it's a table.
3) read the heading of it. It says executive branch. No one is saying the investigation under Clinton didn't produce anything or that Clinton was clean. It just wasn't his executive branch.
4) your better argument, is to say it's lying with stats by only including executive branch.
5) I do have an appreciation for providing links to support your point. But I do chuckle when the link in your first point was just as partisan as the source in the second point that you bash for being partisan.
6) you hate facts.
There a reason why this "table" has now been posted twice and never once was a source for it provided. -
Another example where Hondo needs a boot right in his lying Kunt.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
So Hondo, who are the 9 people who were part of the Bush "executive branch" who received prison sentences? -
I lined out the argument against the table for you.....USMChawk said:Baphomet posted it, Hondo’s just defending it. But it’s not his...
-
Hondo's just going to end up telling us that he never believed any of the numbers in the table he was just telling us what the Iraqis think.USMChawk said:Baphomet posted it, Hondo’s just defending it. But it’s not his...
-
You sure?
-
Going back to the ‘table’ I see Obama has 0’s across the board. Then I remember David Patraeus.
-
Obviously not part of the "executive branch."USMChawk said:Going back to the ‘table’ I see Obama has 0’s across the board. Then I remember David Patraeus.
-
Amazing, another thread where Hondo runs his mouth and then runs away.
-
