Finally we get to the truth
Comments
-
Maybe he was just informing us of what the Iraqis think2001400ex said:Shocking you didn't provide the link. Come up with an original thought Race.
-
It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
-
Thank you for adding context and reinforcing Races point
-
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
It's almost like she ignores shit she doesn't want to see/believe.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit. -
1. Your graph states there were only 2 Clinton administration indictments. Since we know that’s bullshit, it follows that the rest of the meme is bullshit.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off. -
1) that's not my graph.USMChawk said:
1. Your graph states there were only 2 Clinton administration indictments. Since we know that’s bullshit, it follows that the rest of the meme is bullshit.2001400ex said:
Another example where Bob is confused because he can't read words.SFGbob said:
Yes because it was complete bullshit then just as it is now.Baphomet said:It's funny how hard Trump leg humpers try to ignore the fact that Trump's own branch of government is investigating him, his attorneys, his election team -- and putting them in jail.
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off.
2) it's not a graph, it's a table.
3) read the heading of it. It says executive branch. No one is saying the investigation under Clinton didn't produce anything or that Clinton was clean. It just wasn't his executive branch.
4) your better argument, is to say it's lying with stats by only including executive branch.
5) I do have an appreciation for providing links to support your point. But I do chuckle when the link in your first point was just as partisan as the source in the second point that you bash for being partisan.
6) you hate facts. -
You posted it
-
Baphomet posted it, Hondo’s just defending it. But it’s not his...




