Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hypocrites.

124

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    First 10 rights are considered to pre exist the constitution and God given. HTH

    I recall the teachings of Jesus where he wanted everyone armed.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.

    Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.

    You can have my answer now, Senator.
    What’s the 18th amendment?
    I voted against it

    Its since been repealed via the Constitution
    So we can repeal amendments?
    Of course

    37 states and you can grab all the guns you want

    Probably be as effective as 18 too

    Unintended consequences
    Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.

    And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,495 Founders Club

    Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.

    Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.

    You can have my answer now, Senator.
    What’s the 18th amendment?
    I voted against it

    Its since been repealed via the Constitution
    So we can repeal amendments?
    Of course

    37 states and you can grab all the guns you want

    Probably be as effective as 18 too

    Unintended consequences
    Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.

    And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
    Well you do need a wall

    They work very effectively

    I'm willing to consider an alternative but there isn't one

    Just talk and nonsense

    As wall is a big part of reform and will get illegals here on a path and deal with the whole issue

    Chuck and Nancy won't even talk

    Hondo and the gang have had weeks to come up with a rational argument against
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,495 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    First 10 rights are considered to pre exist the constitution and God given. HTH

    I recall the teachings of Jesus where he wanted everyone armed.
    We aren't a theocracy moron
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    First 10 rights are considered to pre exist the constitution and God given. HTH

    I recall the teachings of Jesus where he wanted everyone armed.
    Actually the argument for Jesus being in favor of arming yourself to defend yourself isn’t the worst religious argument there is.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    First 10 rights are considered to pre exist the constitution and God given. HTH

    I recall the teachings of Jesus where he wanted everyone armed.
    We aren't a theocracy moron
    No shit. That we agree.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    First 10 rights are considered to pre exist the constitution and God given. HTH

    I recall the teachings of Jesus where he wanted everyone armed.
    Actually the argument for Jesus being in favor of arming yourself to defend yourself isn’t the worst religious argument there is.
    That is true. Only because there are a lot of shitty religious arguments.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.

    Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.

    You can have my answer now, Senator.
    What’s the 18th amendment?
    I voted against it

    Its since been repealed via the Constitution
    So we can repeal amendments?
    Of course

    37 states and you can grab all the guns you want

    Probably be as effective as 18 too

    Unintended consequences
    Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.

    And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
    Well you do need a wall

    They work very effectively

    I'm willing to consider an alternative but there isn't one

    Just talk and nonsense

    As wall is a big part of reform and will get illegals here on a path and deal with the whole issue

    Chuck and Nancy won't even talk

    Hondo and the gang have had weeks to come up with a rational argument against
    My reaction to this is “alright fuck it build the wall if you want to”. I think Trump will prevent you from winning though. When you burn all the bridges it becomes very difficult to get across.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,512 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.

    Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.

    You can have my answer now, Senator.
    Curious for you to find that in the Constitution.
    Just don't call him a fucking moron
    Where is border security in the Constitution?
    Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;

    This took me 15 seconds to find. Be a better poaster.
    No shit. Race is too fucktarded to support his comments.

    Next question. Is this considered an invasion?
    No more than Monica's blowie was considered a sex act.

    40 million times.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,512 Standard Supporter
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.

    Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.

    You can have my answer now, Senator.
    Curious for you to find that in the Constitution.
    Just don't call him a fucking moron
    Where is border security in the Constitution?
    Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;

    This took me 15 seconds to find. Be a better poaster.
    No shit. Race is too fucktarded to support his comments.

    Next question. Is this considered an invasion?
    Ah, I see. You’re one of those faux intellectuals who’s mommy told them how smart and special they were, and you grew up with a false sense of superiority. I bet you feel you’re the smartest person in the room and can’t understand why no one will listen to you. Hint, it’s because you’re not.

    I’m not playing your retard games. Race has it right...Fuck off.
    Can we be pen pals? Old school. Send post cards and such.

    BFFs are so played out.