Trumptard’s Wall will stop illegal drugs from flowing across our Southern border...
Comments
-
Hondo: “We shouldn’t be trying to secure the border”
-
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it. -
Where do you see that? Fuck you are stupid.sarktastic said:Hondo: “We shouldn’t be trying to secure the border”
-
Spend more. That was tough2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Where is the Democrats legislation on these other items?
That's what I thought -
Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.
If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to. -
Fucktarded comment of the day.sarktastic said:
Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.
If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to. -
I mean, does anybody really care about the Mariners any more?sarktastic said:Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.
If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.
In accounting parlance, that shit needs to be impaired on society's balance sheet.
-
T-Mobile does. and probably Ichiro
-
I know you are being sarcastic. But impairment is based on discounted future cash flows. And as long as TV revenue comes in, they are good.PurpleThrobber said:
I mean, does anybody really care about the Mariners any more?sarktastic said:Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.
If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.
In accounting parlance, that shit needs to be impaired on society's balance sheet. -
Hondo needs burger flippers he can underpay because he doesn't believe in the bullshit that spouts from his pie hole.RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it -
RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.
-
RaceFS needs his butt buddy Gay Bob to come help translate his fucktarded comments into something coherent.
-
No I don'tinsinceredawg said:RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.
Lying again I see -
This is the "rational" argument against from @insinceredawg
-
What do you think the $5.7B is going to cover then? You dismissed Hondo's 200 miles of wall comment so I'm curious what your expectations are.RaceBannon said:
No I don'tinsinceredawg said:RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.
Lying again I see -
I said spend what it takesinsinceredawg said:
What do you think the $5.7B is going to cover then? You dismissed Hondo's 200 miles of wall comment so I'm curious what your expectations are.RaceBannon said:
No I don'tinsinceredawg said:RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.
Lying again I see
The 5 billion was a compromise by Trump to get a deal for now
Build the wall. End of story -
Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?
Nah.
-
This already has its own thread. HTHsalemcoog said:Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?
Nah. -
I know facts are like cryptonite for you. I’ll try to poast the kind of BS that your mind can comprehend next time.2001400ex said:
This already has its own thread. HTHsalemcoog said:Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?
Nah. -
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it. -
Said another way, "once again I've boxed myself into the retard room and can't find my way out"2001400ex said:
This already has its own thread. HTHsalemcoog said:Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?
Nah. -
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it. -
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it. -
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes. -
Once again, you didn’t read your own article. Thanks for enforcing my poast.2001400ex said:
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes.
HondoFS. -
Actually I did.salemcoog said:
Once again, you didn’t read your own article. Thanks for enforcing my poast.2001400ex said:
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes.
HondoFS. -
Oh so you just didn’t comprehend where it said that households with legal US citizens aka anchor babies are eligible for all benefits.2001400ex said:
Actually I did.salemcoog said:
Once again, you didn’t read your own article. Thanks for enforcing my poast.2001400ex said:
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes.
HondoFS.
Did you miss the part where even illegals are eligible for benefits in 26 states, whether they have children or not?
Did you see the part that after 5 years, the illegal parents of anchor babies are eligible for even more benefits in addition to their children?
Did you also see that they didn’t put any dollar value on these benefits?
Wonder why? Could it be it’s a partisan site? -
Did your see where they is pay into the system more than they take out? Did you see in those 26 states, it's State assistance, not federal, that they are eligible for?salemcoog said:
Oh so you just didn’t comprehend where it said that households with legal US citizens aka anchor babies are eligible for all benefits.2001400ex said:
Actually I did.salemcoog said:
Once again, you didn’t read your own article. Thanks for enforcing my poast.2001400ex said:
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes.
HondoFS.
Did you miss the part where even illegals are eligible for benefits in 26 states?
Did you see the part that after 5 years, the illegal parents of anchor babies are eligible for even more benefits in addition to their children?
Did you also see that they didn’t put any dollar value on these benefits?
Wonder why? Could it be it’s a partisan site? -
Bullshit
-
Oh since it’s STATE dollars that doesn’t count. Got it.2001400ex said:
Did your see where they is pay into the system more than they take out? Did you see in those 26 states, it's State assistance, not federal, that they are eligible for?salemcoog said:
Oh so you just didn’t comprehend where it said that households with legal US citizens aka anchor babies are eligible for all benefits.2001400ex said:
Actually I did.salemcoog said:
Once again, you didn’t read your own article. Thanks for enforcing my poast.2001400ex said:
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/salemcoog said:
You’re right. My numbers are on the low side. You used to be able to find actual data on this but it’s been wiped by the liberal media. It was $81 Billion in 2013. It’s gotta be much more than that now as those little brownie Catholics are prolific as rabbits.2001400ex said:
Was this really right after your own post that says "facts are like kryptonite"?salemcoog said:
That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.2001400ex said:
The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels
That's rational. Secure the border
There is no argument against it
In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
Wiped by the liberal media. For fucks sakes.
HondoFS.
Did you miss the part where even illegals are eligible for benefits in 26 states?
Did you see the part that after 5 years, the illegal parents of anchor babies are eligible for even more benefits in addition to their children?
Did you also see that they didn’t put any dollar value on these benefits?
Wonder why? Could it be it’s a partisan site?
How do you know this. They only stated what was paid in, by their own partisan self serving interests, not what was PAID out.
Nice link Hondo. Bi-partisan AF. Not really.
So my original point that you can’t find info on what is paid out to anchor families stands.
