Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Paul Manafort shared 2016 polling data with Russian associate, according to court filing

insinceredawg
insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
in Tug Tavern
Collusion?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/paul-manafort-shared-2016-polling-data-with-russian-employee-according-to-court-filing/2019/01/08/3f562ad8-12b0-11e9-803c-4ef28312c8b9_story.html?utm_term=.6d197461cc13

Paul Manafort shared 2016 presidential campaign polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, an associate the FBI has said has ties to Russian intelligence, according to a court filing.

The information is in a filing that appears to inadvertently include details not intended to be made public and indicates a pathway by which the Russians could have had access to Trump campaign data.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    https://nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html

    Hope no Russians are reading this bored
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Oh no!!! Not polling data.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    You're free to tell us what violation occurred by sharing polling data with the Russians Hondo.

    Btw, this is the very same Kunt who had no problem with Hillary sharing with the Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans and any other foreign actor classified materials through her unsecured home brew server.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    Polling data is classified

    Hillary's SOS emails not so much

    The only simple minded people here at the idiots that think this is a story like hondo
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Gotta love the left and polls
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,609 Standard Supporter

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    Ironic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    The campaign pays for the polling just like NYTimes pays for their polling. Campaigns often share their polling information with the public just as news organizations sometimes refuse to publish their polling results.

    The type of polling and methods used for both is identical but often a campaign will poll for more detailed and specific information but not always. What either of them choose to do with the polling data they paid for is entirely up to them. They can “intend” to share it with whomever the fuck they like just like you share your lies and stupidity with us Honda, intended or not.

    There are no national security secrets in campaign polling data but there sure was in Hillary’s emails and you didn’t give a fuck about who that information was shared with.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    RaceBannon said:

    https://nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html

    Hope no Russians are reading this bored

    TRAITOR!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited January 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    Yeah, because if you Google "Trump Internal Polls" you don't get almost 4MM hits on news stories on Internal polls discussed and leaked to various media organizations.

    HondoRFS...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    The campaign pays for the polling just like NYTimes pays for their polling. Campaigns often share their polling information with the public just as news organizations sometimes refuse to publish their polling results.

    The type of polling and methods used for both is identical but often a campaign will poll for more detailed and specific information but not always. What either of them choose to do with the polling data they paid for is entirely up to them. They can “intend” to share it with whomever the fuck they like just like you share your lies and stupidity with us Honda, intended or not.

    There are no national security secrets in campaign polling data but there sure was in Hillary’s emails and you didn’t give a fuck about who that information was shared with.
    Why did they share this data with the Russians? You're so fixated on debating Hondo do you ever take a second to think about what you're defending?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited January 2019
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    The campaign pays for the polling just like NYTimes pays for their polling. Campaigns often share their polling information with the public just as news organizations sometimes refuse to publish their polling results.

    The type of polling and methods used for both is identical but often a campaign will poll for more detailed and specific information but not always. What either of them choose to do with the polling data they paid for is entirely up to them. They can “intend” to share it with whomever the fuck they like just like you share your lies and stupidity with us Honda, intended or not.

    There are no national security secrets in campaign polling data but there sure was in Hillary’s emails and you didn’t give a fuck about who that information was shared with.
    Why did they share this data with the Russians? You're so fixated on debating Hondo do you ever take a second to think about what you're defending?
    I have no fucking idea. Now why did you up vote Hondo’s pathetic bullshit and why did you not give a fuck when Hillary “shared” classified information?

    What am I defending?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,038
    edited January 2019
    Rick Pitino had sex with his mistress on a restaurant table, provided hookers to recruits and was the biggest recipient of dirty Adidas money. He's now listed as the favorite to be the next head coach at UCLA.

    His doppelganger is going behind bars. He'll get out and rinse.repeat. it's the American way. NOGAF.

    Polling data does jack shit to national security. It's not like Manafort sold uranium to the russkies....




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    greenblood said:

    2001400ex said:

    Lots of simple mind Trump dick sucking.

    So according to you, this limp dick story has legs...got it
    Did I say that? I know nothing about it. But I do chuckle at Trump dick suckers that think campaign polls are the same as NY times. When they don't know any more about it either.
    Tell us what the difference between campaign polls and a poll done by the NYTimes Hondo?

    Cue the Kunt act.
    Yes one is public and one is campaign data not intended to be shared with other countries. You've said a lot of stupid shit. This one is near the top.
    The campaign pays for the polling just like NYTimes pays for their polling. Campaigns often share their polling information with the public just as news organizations sometimes refuse to publish their polling results.

    The type of polling and methods used for both is identical but often a campaign will poll for more detailed and specific information but not always. What either of them choose to do with the polling data they paid for is entirely up to them. They can “intend” to share it with whomever the fuck they like just like you share your lies and stupidity with us Honda, intended or not.

    There are no national security secrets in campaign polling data but there sure was in Hillary’s emails and you didn’t give a fuck about who that information was shared with.
    Why did they share this data with the Russians? You're so fixated on debating Hondo do you ever take a second to think about what you're defending?
    I have no fucking idea. Now why did you up vote Hondo’s pathetic bullshit and why did you not give a fuck when Hillary “shared” classified information?

    What am I defending?
    But but but Hillary. Your only defense of Trump is lies about Hillary. Nice work!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Rick Pitino had sex with his mistress on a restaurant table, provided hookers to recruits and was the biggest recipient of dirty Adidas money. He's now listed as the favorite to be the next head coach at UCLA.

    His doppelganger is going behind bars. He'll get out and rinse.repeat. it's the American way. NOGAF.

    Polling data does jack shit to national security. It's not like Manafort sold uranium to the russkies....





    Same with you. Throbber is better than the but but but Hillary and uranium lies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Uranium lies?

    Implication here of course is that you hold secret information that hasn’t been released yet.

    Care to share what your news sources have revealed to you but are withholding from all the rest of us?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    sarktastic said:

    Uranium lies?

    Implication here of course is that you hold secret information that hasn’t been released yet.

    Care to share what your news sources have revealed to you but are withholding from all the rest of us?

    Republicans held Congress and presidency the last two years and held Congress the majority of the time since the uranium one deal happened. Where are the investigations? Where are the charges? While in charge of Congress they had no problems launching an investigation (remember about stand down order and those lies?). Why not investigate uranium one?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    sarktastic said:

    Uranium lies?

    Implication here of course is that you hold secret information that hasn’t been released yet.

    Care to share what your news sources have revealed to you but are withholding from all the rest of us?

    Republicans held Congress and presidency the last two years and held Congress the majority of the time since the uranium one deal happened. Where are the investigations? Where are the charges? While in charge of Congress they had no problems launching an investigation (remember about stand down order and those lies?). Why not investigate uranium one?
    It was investigated and proven

    Congress doesn't charge anyone. The corrupt DOJ refused to act

    For the 100th time you fucking moron
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    sarktastic said:

    Uranium lies?

    Implication here of course is that you hold secret information that hasn’t been released yet.

    Care to share what your news sources have revealed to you but are withholding from all the rest of us?

    Republicans held Congress and presidency the last two years and held Congress the majority of the time since the uranium one deal happened. Where are the investigations? Where are the charges? While in charge of Congress they had no problems launching an investigation (remember about stand down order and those lies?). Why not investigate uranium one?
    It was investigated and proven

    Congress doesn't charge anyone. The corrupt DOJ refused to act

    For the 100th time you fucking moron
    El oh fucking El. So the DOJ was handed a smoking gun and did nothing about it. Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    sarktastic said:

    Uranium lies?

    Implication here of course is that you hold secret information that hasn’t been released yet.

    Care to share what your news sources have revealed to you but are withholding from all the rest of us?

    Republicans held Congress and presidency the last two years and held Congress the majority of the time since the uranium one deal happened. Where are the investigations? Where are the charges? While in charge of Congress they had no problems launching an investigation (remember about stand down order and those lies?). Why not investigate uranium one?
    It was investigated and proven

    Congress doesn't charge anyone. The corrupt DOJ refused to act

    For the 100th time you fucking moron
    El oh fucking El. So the DOJ was handed a smoking gun and did nothing about it. Link?
    Why?

    You been shown this a thousand times

    Revel in your ignorance

    The DOJ met with Bubba on the tarmac while his wife was being "investigated"

    Not as serious as internal polls being shown to foreigners but not a good look. At all

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    It has nothing to do with Hillary and everything to do with what a hypocritical piece of shit you are. And thanks for admitting there is no difference between campaign polling and polling done by the NYTimes other than who pays for it.

    What's was my lie about Hillary Hondo? Watch this space closely Hondo is going to perform another one of his Kunt acts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    It has nothing to do with Hillary and everything to do with what a hypocritical piece of shit you are. And thanks for admitting there is no difference between campaign polling and polling done by the NYTimes other than who pays for it.

    What's was my lie about Hillary Hondo? Watch this space closely Hondo is going to perform another one of his Kunt acts.

    why did you not give a fuck when Hillary “shared” classified information?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,817 Founders Club
    Hondo believes the Russians hacked the election but no country could Hillary's bath tub server
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Hondo believes the Russians hacked the election but no country could Hillary's bath tub server

    WikiLeaks is releasing the emails any day now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter