Prior to the BSECS, the SEC won 6 national titles in 30 years
No team from the ACC could knock the SEC off. FSU was too slow and small according to Herbie the dentist at halftime (that Fuck gets paid by the SEC to further their dying cause.). We saw otherwise. Stanford and Michigan St. Would have beat Auburn. They both have killer defenses and win at the LOS. But no way the Pac12 could beat Auburn even though 16 weeks prior a bottom - feeding pac12 team (WSU) beat them in every possible category, except the last minute scoreboard. Give it up you toothless southeastern buttbillies. Game is up.
Just like I predicted and wrote for this site, "get in the backseat of the car SEC",
You're not driving anymore. The SEC has been exposed. Now the playoff will force them to go out of conference, or will they (I think the committee will consider the SEC schedule as proof enough? Nick Saban will suck every cock on the committee in that regard)
I think nothing changes. The committee will be brainwashed by SEC SOS. Is Condi Rice qualified to look past SEC bias? The committee is the worst thing to ever happen to college football. Can't wait for the fuck-show that is coming after the initial selection.
I cunt believe I'm putting the fate of my huskies in the hands of a woman. This is preposterous, but plays right into the hands of the SEC, Ohio St, Texas/Oklahoma (no conf. title game) and Notre Dame. The Pac12 will be hoping and praying for just a look. Especially with one loss. No 1 loss pac12 team will get into 4-team. Will have to wait for 8-team. Unless it's Stanford. Stanford will be in play.
Comments
-
I take it a team isn't allowed to improve at all over a season?puppylove_sugarsteel said:2 of those were split. Then since ESPN really got cranked up, and 16 years of the BSECS, the SEC won HALF THE TITLES. Did the SEC players magically get bigger, faster and stronger all of a sudden, even though they recruit out of state more than their respective "southeastern" states, the states they are supposedly bigger, faster and stronger than?
No team from the ACC could knock the SEC off. FSU was too slow and small according to Herbie the dentist at halftime (that Fuck gets paid by the SEC to further their dying cause.). We saw otherwise. Stanford and Michigan St. Would have beat Auburn. They both have killer defenses and win at the LOS. But no way the Pac12 could beat Auburn even though 16 weeks prior a bottom - feeding pac12 team (WSU) beat them in every possible category, except the last minute scoreboard. Give it up you toothless southeastern buttbillies. Game is up.
Just like I predicted and wrote for this site, "get in the backseat of the car SEC",
You're not driving anymore. The SEC has been exposed. Now the playoff will force them to go out of conference, or will they (I think the committee will consider the SEC schedule as proof enough? Nick Saban will suck every cock on the committee in that regard)
I think nothing changes. The committee will be brainwashed by SEC SOS. Is Condi Rice qualified to look past SEC bias? The committee is the worst thing to ever happen to college football. Can't wait for the fuck-show that is coming after the initial selection.
I cunt believe I'm putting the fate of my huskies in the hands of a woman. This is preposterous, but plays right into the hands of the SEC, Ohio St, Texas/Oklahoma (no conf. title game) and Notre Dame. The Pac12 will be hoping and praying for just a look. Especially with one loss. No 1 loss pac12 team will get into 4-team. Will have to wait for 8-team. Unless it's Stanford. Stanford will be in play. -
Why do you hate conservative, black women?puppylove_sugarsteel said:2 of those were split. Then since ESPN really got cranked up, and 16 years of the BSECS, the SEC won HALF THE TITLES. Did the SEC players magically get bigger, faster and stronger all of a sudden, even though they recruit out of state more than their respective "southeastern" states, the states they are supposedly bigger, faster and stronger than?
No team from the ACC could knock the SEC off. FSU was too slow and small according to Herbie the dentist at halftime (that Fuck gets paid by the SEC to further their dying cause.). We saw otherwise. Stanford and Michigan St. Would have beat Auburn. They both have killer defenses and win at the LOS. But no way the Pac12 could beat Auburn even though 16 weeks prior a bottom - feeding pac12 team (WSU) beat them in every possible category, except the last minute scoreboard. Give it up you toothless southeastern buttbillies. Game is up.
Just like I predicted and wrote for this site, "get in the backseat of the car SEC",
You're not driving anymore. The SEC has been exposed. Now the playoff will force them to go out of conference, or will they (I think the committee will consider the SEC schedule as proof enough? Nick Saban will suck every cock on the committee in that regard)
I think nothing changes. The committee will be brainwashed by SEC SOS. Is Condi Rice qualified to look past SEC bias? The committee is the worst thing to ever happen to college football. Can't wait for the fuck-show that is coming after the initial selection.
I cunt believe I'm putting the fate of my huskies in the hands of a woman. This is preposterous, but plays right into the hands of the SEC, Ohio St, Texas/Oklahoma (no conf. title game) and Notre Dame. The Pac12 will be hoping and praying for just a look. Especially with one loss. No 1 loss pac12 team will get into 4-team. Will have to wait for 8-team. Unless it's Stanford. Stanford will be in play. -
The conference lost three games, none being huge upsets, and were competitive in each of those losses. Not really sure what other conference did better or showed its superiority.
-
I like to say that losing the title game for the first time in 8 years EXPOSED the SEC. I like to post meaningless stats about pre BCS champions to prove that once we got a halfway decent system the SEC started winning a lot of championships
By the way, you might want to look a little closer to home on your schedule rant. UW is a pussy now in non con games -
I also like to miss the real story that the states of Alabama and Florida own college football this century. Florida owned it in the 90's with three schools. And Bama snuck out a title in the 90's as well.
Florida, Miami, and Florida State rose from the swamp in the 80's and changed the landscape of football to this day. The SEC embraced the challenge.
The Pac 10/12 was run by a bunch of whiny cunts blaming ESPN instead of building programs that could compete. Other than USC which is USC.
When they have a coach. -
the schedule argument is constantly used for the conference that actually wins, if the pac-12 were winning championships people would use the same bullshit. Every team schedules cupcakes nowRaceBannon said:I like to say that losing the title game for the first time in 8 years EXPOSED the SEC. I like to post meaningless stats about pre BCS champions to prove that once we got a halfway decent system the SEC started winning a lot of championships
By the way, you might want to look a little closer to home on your schedule rant. UW is a pussy now in non con games -
FSU reminded me of Oregon in the Civil War game minus retarded coaching. Florida State's defense was so completely gassed they allowed Auburn to score with enough time for their offense to lead a final drive victory. You really can't blame Auburn, because like OSU, they scored on a long running play.
Even Florida State's last two scores were flukie. An Auburn player pulls his hammy on the kickoff return, and then two defenders tackle each other on that long pass play. -
That's the puppylove I was waiting for.
What a nut. -
It's true that ESPN has a strong vested interest in the dominance of the SEC. This will only grow next year when TheSECNetworkOperatedByESPN comes online. And I do believe that ESPN's influence has a lot to do with how many SEC teams start out each season ranked in the preseason top ten -- which in turn basically assures that the SEC champ will get to the BCS cash game each year without necessarily having to play *anybody* OOC.
Still, you can't look at the results on the field during the BCS era and claim that SEC teams haven't deserved the title shots they've gotten. -
i like to reference "this century" and then talk about the 80s and 90s. thats what i like to do.
