Ocasio-Cortez advocates 82% tax rate for richest New Yorkers; compares herself to Lincoln, FDR
Comments
-
Rent free
-
Yet you responded. Fuckwit2001400ex said:Rent free
-
Sic burn bro.MikeDamone said:
Yet you responded. Fuckwit2001400ex said:Rent free
-
why are all you poor shits mad about this... lmao
-
She prances around like she hasn't gotten a good deep dicking. Someone needs to mushroom stamp that donkey face and knock some sense into her. I hope the tax goes through, then EVERYBODY with the money will leave and that state will die a hilarious death.
-
They'll just use loopholes and park money in offshore accounts. If you tax them 75%, they'll end up paying 33 or something. It's better than taxing them 39 and having them pay an effective rate of 15. Plus their capital gains are low, and they still bitch about the estate tax, which only effect less than one percent of people. There won't be some massive exodus. It's the same thing as the SJW celebs. The only one who moved is Johnny Depp (over ten years ago), and he still lives in the US much of the year.Postal91 said:She prances around like she hasn't gotten a good deep dicking. Someone needs to mushroom stamp that donkey face and knock some sense into her. I hope the tax goes through, then EVERYBODY with the money will leave and that state will die a hilarious death.
-
-
Her followers are already calling for killing any opponents.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gops-steve-scalise-shuts-down-twitter-debate-on-taxes-with-ocasio-cortez-after-radical-followers-allude-to-virginia-shooting -
you don't see the big pictureZoneUW said:why are all you poor shits mad about this... lmao
-
No one paid the crazy rates. Loopholes on top of loopholes.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
-
You keep saying that but we paid off the war bonds in the 50s. If no one paid the top tax rate, then why did the government have a surplus?Sledog said:
No one paid the crazy rates. Loopholes on top of loopholes.Fire_Marshall_Bill said: -
Sweet Geezus what a dumbfuck2001400ex said:
You keep saying that but we paid off the war bonds in the 50s. If no one paid the top tax rate, then why did the government have a surplus?Sledog said:
No one paid the crazy rates. Loopholes on top of loopholes.Fire_Marshall_Bill said: -
Well duh, she Is a communist after allSledog said:Her followers are already calling for killing any opponents.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gops-steve-scalise-shuts-down-twitter-debate-on-taxes-with-ocasio-cortez-after-radical-followers-allude-to-virginia-shooting -
If you have a government that needs some of it's citizenry, no matter how small the percentage, to pay 70% of what they make to fund critical governmental needs for the country, then the 70% tax rate is not the problem. The government that was allowed to grow that large and need that much money to do that many things for that many people is the problem.
-
This is true. In the 50s, we needed to pay off the war bonds and people supported that cause.Swaye said:If you have a government that needs some of it's citizenry, no matter how small the percentage, to pay 70% of what they makes to fund critical governmental needs for the country, then the 70% tax rate is not the problem. The government that was allowed to grow that large and need that much money to do that many things for that many people is the problem.
That being said, unless something extreme like a world war happens, we'll never see a 70% tax rate. It is fun to watch AOC trigger half the folks here tho. -
This is why I can't quit.Postal91 said:She prances around like she hasn't gotten a good deep dicking. Someone needs to mushroom stamp that donkey face and knock some sense into her. I hope the tax goes through, then EVERYBODY with the money will leave and that state will die a hilarious death.
mushroom stamp (plural mushroom stamps) (slang, humorous) A mark left by slapping a person with one's penis.
I learn the best shit here. -
SFGbob said:
Sweet Geezus what a dumbfuck2001400ex said:
You keep saying that but we paid off the war bonds in the 50s. If no one paid the top tax rate, then why did the government have a surplus?Sledog said:
No one paid the crazy rates. Loopholes on top of loopholes.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Ok cool. Refute what I said. -
When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
-
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes. -
Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.2001400ex said:
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.
-
It's our spending that's completely fucking out of whack, not our lack of tax revenue.
-
Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).SFGbob said:
Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.2001400ex said:
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.
My point still stands. -
I knew some dumbfuck was going to post that. Congrats!!! You try to use that chart and say it's not a big deal. But there's a range of 6% on that chart. What number do you think 6% of GDP is? That's a big fucking number.SFGbob said:
It's our spending that's completely fucking out of whack, not our lack of tax revenue. -
The whole tax rate thing is whatever ... and even she called for it as a graduated tax rate so whatever on that
The thing that floored me more was freshman Congresswoman comparing herself to Lincoln and FDR ... that's laughable at this point -
How have no nudes of AOC leaked yet?!? That is unbelievable. You know they exist somewhere.
Though it might be a good strategy to keep those under wraps until she runs for Senate or POTUS. Probably already bought, paid for and stored on HIlary's bathtub server.
-
She should defiantly get the sex tape out there now. Play it out with a short written statement. Followup with tears for TV. Then, let it die till Senate time.
In the future it will be "old news". pervs who missed it and search for it will see the Younger/Hotter version and go, huh. Proobably vote for her. -
Technically2001400ex said:
Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).SFGbob said:
Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.2001400ex said:
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.
My point still stands.
What a putz -
Doesn't change my point. HTHRaceBannon said:
Technically2001400ex said:
Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).SFGbob said:
Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.2001400ex said:
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.
My point still stands.
What a putz -
"Technically" there was Social Security in the 1950s? What a fucking worthless lying Kunt you are Hondo. The existence of Social Security in the 1950s isn't just a point of semantics or a technicality you fucking dipshit.2001400ex said:
Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).SFGbob said:
Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.2001400ex said:
Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.SFGbob said:When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.
We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.
As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s
Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.
But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.
My point still stands.
The rest of post is just more gibberish to cover the fact that you had your head up your ass. -
I didn't use the chart to say it wasn't a big deal you lying worthless piece of shit. I used the chart to refute your head up the ass claim that we were able to pay off war debt and run a surplus because our taxes were so much higher back in the 1950s. You remember the 1950s don't you Hondo? Back before we had Social Security, right moron.2001400ex said:
I knew some dumbfuck was going to post that. Congrats!!! You try to use that chart and say it's not a big deal. But there's a range of 6% on that chart. What number do you think 6% of GDP is? That's a big fucking number.SFGbob said:
It's our spending that's completely fucking out of whack, not our lack of tax revenue.
Our taxes as a percentage of GDP are higher now then they were then Hondo. I await your next strawman ass fuck and gibberish response.
