Queery #2
Comments
-
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist. -
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist. -
We need to build 'The Wall'. I want to see what other ineffective schemes can be dialed up when that one doesn't work.
-
I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.PurpleJ said:
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
Could you be any more self righteous? -
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off. -
No, the oil that powers your computer in the school library.
-
I'm not self righteous. The Lord is my salvation. God bless!CirrhosisDawg said:
I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.PurpleJ said:
Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Great sanctimony as always.PurpleJ said:
Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
Could you be any more self righteous? -
OK, name the subsidies.Gwad said:
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Please be specific.
I'll wait. -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2017/10/6/16428458/us-energy-coal-oil-subsidiesBlu82 said:
OK, name the subsidies.Gwad said:
The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?sarktastic said:
How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?CirrhosisDawg said:
California makes you angry!Blu82 said:
I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.CirrhosisDawg said:I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.
Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.
The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.
States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
Please be specific.
I'll wait.
