Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We're not there yet....
Comments
-
He's not a god. He's a good coach. You can develop guys and teach them good fundamentals and all that. I saw that by the Boise CC game in his second year. The defense was coming along and it looked much better than anything since probably 2000. At some point, elite talent is needed. I really haven't had the time or will to follow recruiting much since 2015-2016, but clearly we aren't there yet. I keep hearing excuses, or that we'd better wait until next year, or 2020, or whenever. My favorite line is that Clemson took eight years to really get good. Really? It takes eight now? I thought it took five.
I can live with 12-2, 10-3, and 10-4 with two Pac 12 titles and a Party Bowl. That's not bad at all. But I want to do better and win national titles. I don't see the evidence that suddenly we're going to be one of the elite 0-2 loss teams year in and year out right now. -
Haskins vs. Browning abilities were one of the main difference and could be argued ended up costing us the game.
Get an elite QB and check back in. -
Shit, I'd take a very good one.DawgFader said:Haskins vs. Browning abilities were one of the main difference and could be argued ended up costing us the game.
Get an elite QB and check back in. -
We aren't any closer than we were 2 years ago from today. I am hopeful that a QB without a noodledick arm, players who can rush the passer, and consistent offensive line will change that.
Right now we are a NY6 gatekeeper who is one of the better teams in the shittiest P5 conference, that is it. -
I’m starting to wonder if there is an inherent ceiling to our mindset and message, even with better recruits. This whole “grind, refine, compete “message seems to attract or create players who approach the game with the mindset of a professional accountant.
No killer instinct or passion. The problem with the idea of never getting too high or low is that you never get high. And you think the answer to everything is just executing more precisely. It’s not. Our punter isn’t going to be great just because he executes. Same with our field goal kicker. Same with our quarterback. They can be slightly better, but there is a ceiling based on talent. And I feel like even the whole team limits their ceiling, even when talented, with their mindset. We always look like we’re going through the motions. -
They look soft. OG dwags* think they play soft.
It's worse than the offense....or any other statistical analysis.
Charmin soft.
-
Our defense could be better but it’s good enough for NY6 wins. Our offense isn’t. And it’s both players and coaching. Recruiting on D has been great...recruiting on offense has been just good.
Now that the season is over it wouldn’t shock me to learn Lubbick and Hamden don’t get along and Lubbick is out...bet he was pissed when Peterman brought Hamden back and bet he got more pissed when the offense kinda sucked in season. Don’t blame him (or Peterman), but it needs improvement this offseason. Expect Eason will help, but he will need WR help and I expect him to have both a higher ceiling and more variability than we had this season. -
Petersen is soft.
-
Those guys were MEN!MisterEm said:They look soft. OG dwags* think they play soft.
It's worse than the offense....or any other statistical analysis.
Charmin soft. -
Too ytPurpleBaze said:
Those guys were MEN!MisterEm said:They look soft. OG dwags* think they play soft.
It's worse than the offense....or any other statistical analysis.
Charmin soft.
