Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Comedy and satire should be illegal
Comments
-
See @MikeDamone Bob clearly wants the fairness doctrine in place.
-
Such a pathetic lightweight Kunt2001400ex said:See @MikeDamone Bob clearly wants the fairness doctrine in place.
-
And there it is.... a dumb fucked up exuse.2001400ex said:
You have one Democrat saying the removal of fairness doctrine is a cause of the vitriol now. Ok! Got a bill or more than one Democrat? You do realize I can find Republicans saying the same thing, right?MikeDamone said:
Fuck you’re an idiot.2001400ex said:
Dude your article on the fairness doctrine was written in 2007. I thought you included that link as a joke.MikeDamone said:
Keep blowing your load over Fonda and keep ignoring the Fairness Doctrine link what dems over the years want to bring back and it’s directly related to conservative talk shows.2001400ex said:
Yes both are wrong fuckstick. But there's huge difference in the sitting president and Jane Fonda.MikeDamone said:
I just pointed out the left loves to try and censor voices they don’t like. That’s why democrats want the fairness Doctrine back. You lose your shit when trump says shit like that and don’t care when your leftist pals do. Both are wrong. You’re just too much of an idealouge and a hypocrite to pull your head of your stupid ass and look around. Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
You are the one who tried to equate Jane Fonda saying Rush needs to stop to Trump saying SNL needs to stop. HTH.MikeDamone said:
What part of fuck off didn’t you understand?2001400ex said:
Do I need to bring up petitions to secede from the union or other fucktarded conservative causes?MikeDamone said:
That being said, you got any Democrat politicians or any Democrat in power calling to remove Rush?
Do what you want , I’m not a conservative.
Democrats wantig the fairness Doctrine back is all about rush you god damn dip fuck.
Look there's a lot of fucktarded liberals and social media gives them a voice. And I don't give a fuck if you are a conservative or a liberal. But it's seriously stupid to equate that voice to the sitting president.
Dumb shit.
You got anything recent where Democrats want to bring it back?
But I’m sure you still have some fucked up dumb excuse
http://www.insideradio.com/free/fairness-doctrine-still-finds-support-in-congress/article_5fce2a60-5a62-11e8-a922-37ed2da09b05.html
For reelz Mike. You are off your rocker on this one.
First it was just Jane Fonda, then it was the fairness doctrine link was too old, then it was no law makers are currently calling for the fairness Doctrine , now it’s only one law maker... should I keep going or would you like to admit your a retard and a leftist hack now?
-
Keep going. I want to see all the voices wanting the fairness doctrine. Educate me.MikeDamone said:
And there it is.... a dumb fucked up exuse.2001400ex said:
You have one Democrat saying the removal of fairness doctrine is a cause of the vitriol now. Ok! Got a bill or more than one Democrat? You do realize I can find Republicans saying the same thing, right?MikeDamone said:
Fuck you’re an idiot.2001400ex said:
Dude your article on the fairness doctrine was written in 2007. I thought you included that link as a joke.MikeDamone said:
Keep blowing your load over Fonda and keep ignoring the Fairness Doctrine link what dems over the years want to bring back and it’s directly related to conservative talk shows.2001400ex said:
Yes both are wrong fuckstick. But there's huge difference in the sitting president and Jane Fonda.MikeDamone said:
I just pointed out the left loves to try and censor voices they don’t like. That’s why democrats want the fairness Doctrine back. You lose your shit when trump says shit like that and don’t care when your leftist pals do. Both are wrong. You’re just too much of an idealouge and a hypocrite to pull your head of your stupid ass and look around. Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
You are the one who tried to equate Jane Fonda saying Rush needs to stop to Trump saying SNL needs to stop. HTH.MikeDamone said:
What part of fuck off didn’t you understand?2001400ex said:
Do I need to bring up petitions to secede from the union or other fucktarded conservative causes?MikeDamone said:
That being said, you got any Democrat politicians or any Democrat in power calling to remove Rush?
Do what you want , I’m not a conservative.
Democrats wantig the fairness Doctrine back is all about rush you god damn dip fuck.
Look there's a lot of fucktarded liberals and social media gives them a voice. And I don't give a fuck if you are a conservative or a liberal. But it's seriously stupid to equate that voice to the sitting president.
Dumb shit.
You got anything recent where Democrats want to bring it back?
But I’m sure you still have some fucked up dumb excuse
http://www.insideradio.com/free/fairness-doctrine-still-finds-support-in-congress/article_5fce2a60-5a62-11e8-a922-37ed2da09b05.html
For reelz Mike. You are off your rocker on this one.
First it was just Jane Fonda, then it was the fairness doctrine link was too old, then it was no law makers are currently calling for the fairness Doctrine , now it’s only one law maker... should I keep going or would you like to admit your a retard and a leftist hack now? -
But make sure the information is in the headlines. Otherwise he’ll miss it.2001400ex said:
Keep going. I want to see all the voices wanting the fairness doctrine. Educate me.MikeDamone said:
And there it is.... a dumb fucked up exuse.2001400ex said:
You have one Democrat saying the removal of fairness doctrine is a cause of the vitriol now. Ok! Got a bill or more than one Democrat? You do realize I can find Republicans saying the same thing, right?MikeDamone said:
Fuck you’re an idiot.2001400ex said:
Dude your article on the fairness doctrine was written in 2007. I thought you included that link as a joke.MikeDamone said:
Keep blowing your load over Fonda and keep ignoring the Fairness Doctrine link what dems over the years want to bring back and it’s directly related to conservative talk shows.2001400ex said:
Yes both are wrong fuckstick. But there's huge difference in the sitting president and Jane Fonda.MikeDamone said:
I just pointed out the left loves to try and censor voices they don’t like. That’s why democrats want the fairness Doctrine back. You lose your shit when trump says shit like that and don’t care when your leftist pals do. Both are wrong. You’re just too much of an idealouge and a hypocrite to pull your head of your stupid ass and look around. Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
You are the one who tried to equate Jane Fonda saying Rush needs to stop to Trump saying SNL needs to stop. HTH.MikeDamone said:
What part of fuck off didn’t you understand?2001400ex said:
Do I need to bring up petitions to secede from the union or other fucktarded conservative causes?MikeDamone said:
That being said, you got any Democrat politicians or any Democrat in power calling to remove Rush?
Do what you want , I’m not a conservative.
Democrats wantig the fairness Doctrine back is all about rush you god damn dip fuck.
Look there's a lot of fucktarded liberals and social media gives them a voice. And I don't give a fuck if you are a conservative or a liberal. But it's seriously stupid to equate that voice to the sitting president.
Dumb shit.
You got anything recent where Democrats want to bring it back?
But I’m sure you still have some fucked up dumb excuse
http://www.insideradio.com/free/fairness-doctrine-still-finds-support-in-congress/article_5fce2a60-5a62-11e8-a922-37ed2da09b05.html
For reelz Mike. You are off your rocker on this one.
First it was just Jane Fonda, then it was the fairness doctrine link was too old, then it was no law makers are currently calling for the fairness Doctrine , now it’s only one law maker... should I keep going or would you like to admit your a retard and a leftist hack now? -
well what if a russian has invested money in one of those companies or one of them has a russian employee or an employee married to a russian or russian ancestors or looks like a russianinsinceredawg said: -
have to agree with Hondo here - Trump's are bigger and Jane's hang down enough where she thinks they are nuts2001400ex said:
Yes both are wrong fuckstick. But there's huge difference in the sitting president and Jane Fonda.MikeDamone said:
I just pointed out the left loves to try and censor voices they don’t like. That’s why democrats want the fairness Doctrine back. You lose your shit when trump says shit like that and don’t care when your leftist pals do. Both are wrong. You’re just too much of an idealouge and a hypocrite to pull your head of your stupid ass and look around. Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
You are the one who tried to equate Jane Fonda saying Rush needs to stop to Trump saying SNL needs to stop. HTH.MikeDamone said:
What part of fuck off didn’t you understand?2001400ex said:
Do I need to bring up petitions to secede from the union or other fucktarded conservative causes?MikeDamone said:
That being said, you got any Democrat politicians or any Democrat in power calling to remove Rush?
Do what you want , I’m not a conservative.
Democrats wantig the fairness Doctrine back is all about rush you god damn dip fuck.
Look there's a lot of fucktarded liberals and social media gives them a voice. And I don't give a fuck if you are a conservative or a liberal. But it's seriously stupid to equate that voice to the sitting president. -
So, lives were being effected!!!!!!Sledog said:
Liberals being pointed out for their hypocrisy.creepycoug said:
Were lives being effected?!?!Sledog said:Comedy and satire are fine. I do think the left owning most of the media and using the way they have has an impact. I seem to recall the left bitching about Rush being too influential and he should be taken off the air because the right owned talk radio due to his success. I'm betting none of you remember that. On purpose.
Fuck off.
If only your heads would actually explode instead of your whining mouths.
Mods! Stat! -
@MikeDamone what do you think Cruz or arguing for here?MikeDamone said:
And there it is.... a dumb fucked up exuse.2001400ex said:
You have one Democrat saying the removal of fairness doctrine is a cause of the vitriol now. Ok! Got a bill or more than one Democrat? You do realize I can find Republicans saying the same thing, right?MikeDamone said:
Fuck you’re an idiot.2001400ex said:
Dude your article on the fairness doctrine was written in 2007. I thought you included that link as a joke.MikeDamone said:
Keep blowing your load over Fonda and keep ignoring the Fairness Doctrine link what dems over the years want to bring back and it’s directly related to conservative talk shows.2001400ex said:
Yes both are wrong fuckstick. But there's huge difference in the sitting president and Jane Fonda.MikeDamone said:
I just pointed out the left loves to try and censor voices they don’t like. That’s why democrats want the fairness Doctrine back. You lose your shit when trump says shit like that and don’t care when your leftist pals do. Both are wrong. You’re just too much of an idealouge and a hypocrite to pull your head of your stupid ass and look around. Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
You are the one who tried to equate Jane Fonda saying Rush needs to stop to Trump saying SNL needs to stop. HTH.MikeDamone said:
What part of fuck off didn’t you understand?2001400ex said:
Do I need to bring up petitions to secede from the union or other fucktarded conservative causes?MikeDamone said:
That being said, you got any Democrat politicians or any Democrat in power calling to remove Rush?
Do what you want , I’m not a conservative.
Democrats wantig the fairness Doctrine back is all about rush you god damn dip fuck.
Look there's a lot of fucktarded liberals and social media gives them a voice. And I don't give a fuck if you are a conservative or a liberal. But it's seriously stupid to equate that voice to the sitting president.
Dumb shit.
You got anything recent where Democrats want to bring it back?
But I’m sure you still have some fucked up dumb excuse
http://www.insideradio.com/free/fairness-doctrine-still-finds-support-in-congress/article_5fce2a60-5a62-11e8-a922-37ed2da09b05.html
For reelz Mike. You are off your rocker on this one.
First it was just Jane Fonda, then it was the fairness doctrine link was too old, then it was no law makers are currently calling for the fairness Doctrine , now it’s only one law maker... should I keep going or would you like to admit your a retard and a leftist hack now?
In order to be protected by Section 230, companies like Facebook should be “neutral public forums.” On the flip side, they should be considered to be a “publisher or speaker” of user content if they pick and choose what gets published or spoken.
But if Facebook is busy censoring legal, protected speech for political reasons, the company should be held accountable for the posts it lets through. And it should not enjoy any special congressional immunity from liability for its actions.
It is critical that Facebook and other tech platforms take these realizations to heart, because surrendering their status as neutral public forum – engaging in discrimination of political viewpoints – invites government oversight and regulation of social media.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/sen-ted-cruz-facebook-has-been-censoring-or-suppressing-conservative-speech-for-years
