Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

BearsWiin gets some good news

HillsboroDuck
HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
edited December 2018 in College Football Forum


Where would you rank Wilcox amongst conference coaches?

If the O/U is 5 I'd probably go U, but not far.

Pete
Shaw
Willingham (WiTT you nit WITT)
Leach
Kelly
Wilcox
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,705 Founders Club
    Trigger warning please with the willingham
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    @Babushka too high

    but really, wtf has Wilcocks done?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    BennyBeaver said:

    @Babushka too high

    but really, wtf has Wilcocks done?

    Beat the conference champs, then pop off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680
    CuntWaffle said:

    Pete
    Shaw
    Chip*

    Leach
    Whit

    Wilcox
    Herm


    Cristoball
    Helton
    Smiff
    Sumlin


    Can't rank the Colorado guy yet. One more season of improvement could see Wilcox jump up to Leach and Whit status. Chip gets a * because he has proved it in the past and in dominant fashion, but still in LIPO mode to see if it works at UCLA.


    Herm






    Peterman





    Everyone else
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    The top six of Pete, Shaw, Leach, Whitt, Kelly, and Wilcox are legit. Cristobal would be closer if he didn’t go full Sark at year-end. Jury is still out on Herm. Meanwhile Helton, Sumlin, and Smith are all jokes with expiration dates. Who knows where Tucker will fit in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    The top six of Pete, Shaw, Leach, Whitt, Kelly, and Wilcox are legit. Cristobal would be closer if he didn’t go full Sark at year-end. Jury is still out on Herm. Meanwhile Helton, Sumlin, and Smith are all jokes with expiration dates. Who knows where Tucker will fit in.

    Tucker has plans to not recrit California and open up Georgia and Florida.

    So yeah. Just thrw him at the bottom
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    edited December 2018
    I recently sat down with a Cal Bear football expert who told me what a mess Sonny Dykes had left behind. Wilcocks has cleaned it up and improved recruiting and taken Cal from a team who gave up 66 to UW to a team that beat UW and USC in the same season and at the end of the season was a far better team with the second best defense in the Pac

    Its too soon to rate him real high but his trajectory is on track and the raise seems deserved

    Pete is #1 because he out David Shawed David Shaw and is the 2 out of 3 champ. This ranking could continue to flip or flop over the next few seasons. Shaw's pre Petersen body of work is impressive

    Nobody else matters. edit

    I do think Chip will get it done but he hasn't yet. He could matter. Leach does more with less (hi @iDawg ). Wittingham is a worth first loser.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680
    RaceBannon said:

    I recently sat down and thought about how much of a bitch wittingham is

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter