Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The DM.C Fallacy

I am not a TBS.

What does amaze me is how DM.C continues to say Peterman only recruited 1 4* recruit.

I did some research and that is true.

The standard should not be what Peterman did compared to Washington, but what he did compared to his schools

What Kim and his fat crew fail to mention, very few 4* recruits go to mid-tier schools.

From what I can see, brief scanning, only 2009 and 2010 did any 4* kids go to the MWC.

Apples to apples.

What does stand out, with the exception of 2 years ... Peterman was #1 or #2 in recruiting ranks in the MWC.
«1

Comments

  • fivehundredmileDAWGfivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    I concur 100% on this point ... In fact this is one of the biggest arguments against him with my Sark loving friends... With roughly equal recruiting against his MWC peers ... He schooled them on the field.

    This is what matters.... Develop your players to your system so they execute with fucking precision and make as few mistakes as possible.


    This is also the reason why I don't care if he brings in all new coaches ... He's done it before... He knows what he's doing.


  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,539 Founders Club

    *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.

    A monkey sucking on his own cock... Yes, the oppression here is stifling.
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,788
    This is why I asked Kimmy to back up his stat line and let me know how many 4 or 5 star athletes other coaches from non AQ schools brought in before they went on to bigger and better things. How many 4 or 5 star kids did Pat "tuff" Hill bring in? How many did Harbaugh get at San Diego?

    That's the comparison that matters.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,675 Founders Club

    *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.

    A monkey sucking on his own cock... Yes, the oppression here is stifling.
    Welcome to Putin's Russia
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.

    A monkey sucking on his own cock... Yes, the oppression here is stifling.
    so, doogsinparadise is yet 'another' Kim alias?
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    edited January 2014
    It was a metaphor hth.

    You must not read Deadspin.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,539 Founders Club

    It was a metaphor hth.

    You must not read Deadspin.

    Start using some common sense.
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    LawDawg1 said:

    This is why I asked Kimmy to back up his stat line and let me know how many 4 or 5 star athletes other coaches from non AQ schools brought in before they went on to bigger and better things. How many 4 or 5 star kids did Pat "tuff" Hill bring in? How many did Harbaugh get at San Diego?

    That's the comparison that matters.

    A total of seven 4* kids went to MWC since 2007 ... and it occurred over two years.

    One would think SDSU could whoop ass in recruiting ...
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    In what way are 3 star and 4 star football players fundamentally different? Why would one succeed in recruiting one but not the other?
  • Haid_D_SalaamiHaid_D_Salaami Member Posts: 541
    edited January 2014

    *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDkJsVoZYOc

    personally I was offended by your post.

  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    The doog crowd are all overly obsessed with star ratings. WGAF if you get four stars when they're pussies that max out their potential in high school.
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,717 Swaye's Wigwam

    In what way are 3 star and 4 star football players fundamentally different? Why would one succeed in recruiting one but not the other?

    4*s are more likely to come in, not get redshirted (because they're fucking 4*s, what do you expect?) and end up being misused/not developed properly, like Cody Bruns, Kevin Smith, Sione Potoae, and maybe Darrell Daniels (he really should've RS'd instead of playing Special Teams and switching to TE midseason... I hope Sark didn't fuckup his Husky career).
  • fivehundredmileDAWGfivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    Harbaugh wasn't at San Diego State ...

    He was at San Diego ... As in the 'Tereros' .... FCS ...
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    It was a metaphor hth.

    You must not read Deadspin.

    Start using some common sense.
    Don't worry, I'll toe the line. Thanks for the warning!
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Peterman? Thats my word please don't use it. Otherwise good post
  • TailgaterTailgater Member Posts: 1,389

    In what way are 3 star and 4 star football players fundamentally different? Why would one succeed in recruiting one but not the other?

    To get semi-serious in this irrelevantly nonscensical thread, I believe the fundamental differences between 3-star and 4-star recruits are promotional and potential:

    Promotional because most 4(and 5)-star recruits typically live and grow as prep athletes in large media markets where teen-stalking, self-proclaimed recruiting experts are constantly shagging the names and statistical hyperbole of the best performing in the best high school programs.

    Potential because it's evident that the prospects for 3(or lower rated)-star recruits matriculating into the best they can be at the college and NFL levels is greater than the typical 4 and 5-star recruits, who as have likely developed as prep superstars closer to the maximum degree of their potential.

    In all this expert postulating over college football recruiting, a fact of nature seems to get lost in the minds of many. Far more 17-18 year old teens are still just kids becoming men when they graduate from high school than are not. I think all college recruiters know this and it's the coaches willing to work the hardest to find, sign, and develop their fair share of 3 or lower-star OKG's that are more likely to succeed.

  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838

    Harbaugh wasn't at San Diego State ...

    He was at San Diego ... As in the 'Tereros' .... FCS ...

    topdawgnc said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    This is why I asked Kimmy to back up his stat line and let me know how many 4 or 5 star athletes other coaches from non AQ schools brought in before they went on to bigger and better things. How many 4 or 5 star kids did Pat "tuff" Hill bring in? How many did Harbaugh get at San Diego?

    That's the comparison that matters.

    A total of seven 4* kids went to MWC since 2007 ... and it occurred over two years.

    One would think SDSU could whoop ass in recruiting ...
    Hoke The Joke was at State, it is such a great city, should so better recruiting than ... BSU. Was my point.
  • *poof*

    Welcome to Nazi Germany.

    A monkey sucking on his own cock... Yes, the oppression here is stifling.
    What a cool week to be a monkey sucking his own cock brah.
  • Peterman? Thats my word please don't use it. Otherwise good post

    Jack Lockner told me that our new coaches name is Peterman.
Sign In or Register to comment.