Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options
The DM.C Fallacy
topdawgnc
Member Posts: 7,838
I am not a TBS.
What does amaze me is how DM.C continues to say Peterman only recruited 1 4* recruit.
I did some research and that is true.
The standard should not be what Peterman did compared to Washington, but what he did compared to his schools
What Kim and his fat crew fail to mention, very few 4* recruits go to mid-tier schools.
From what I can see, brief scanning, only 2009 and 2010 did any 4* kids go to the MWC.
Apples to apples.
What does stand out, with the exception of 2 years ... Peterman was #1 or #2 in recruiting ranks in the MWC.
What does amaze me is how DM.C continues to say Peterman only recruited 1 4* recruit.
I did some research and that is true.
The standard should not be what Peterman did compared to Washington, but what he did compared to his schools
What Kim and his fat crew fail to mention, very few 4* recruits go to mid-tier schools.
From what I can see, brief scanning, only 2009 and 2010 did any 4* kids go to the MWC.
Apples to apples.
What does stand out, with the exception of 2 years ... Peterman was #1 or #2 in recruiting ranks in the MWC.
Comments
This is what matters.... Develop your players to your system so they execute with fucking precision and make as few mistakes as possible.
This is also the reason why I don't care if he brings in all new coaches ... He's done it before... He knows what he's doing.
Welcome to Nazi Germany.
That's the comparison that matters.
It was a metaphor hth.You must not read Deadspin.
One would think SDSU could whoop ass in recruiting ...
personally I was offended by your post.
He was at San Diego ... As in the 'Tereros' .... FCS ...
Promotional because most 4(and 5)-star recruits typically live and grow as prep athletes in large media markets where teen-stalking, self-proclaimed recruiting experts are constantly shagging the names and statistical hyperbole of the best performing in the best high school programs.
Potential because it's evident that the prospects for 3(or lower rated)-star recruits matriculating into the best they can be at the college and NFL levels is greater than the typical 4 and 5-star recruits, who as have likely developed as prep superstars closer to the maximum degree of their potential.
In all this expert postulating over college football recruiting, a fact of nature seems to get lost in the minds of many. Far more 17-18 year old teens are still just kids becoming men when they graduate from high school than are not. I think all college recruiters know this and it's the coaches willing to work the hardest to find, sign, and develop their fair share of 3 or lower-star OKG's that are more likely to succeed.