Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dawgman.com back pedaling

MikeDamone
MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
in Hardcore Husky Board
After being called out on their horseshit Peterson bashing (kim compared Petersen to Ty), now I'm being told their tune is changing. They obviously read this board. We're in their heads.

This place continues to be the place for objective Husky information and opinion. Fair and balanced.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    Agreed. Though fucktard.com set the bar pretty low, so we shouldn't be too happy with ourselves for just not being retarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    creepycoug said:

    Agreed. Though fucktard.com set the bar pretty low, so we shouldn't be too happy with ourselves for just not being retarded.

    Low tweak.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    creepycoug said:

    Agreed. Though fucktard.com set the bar pretty low, so we shouldn't be too happy with ourselves for just not being retarded.

    We are always right. Always

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    MikeDamone said:

    After being called out on their horseshit Peterson bashing (kim compared Petersen to Ty), now I'm being told their tune is changing. They obviously read this board. We're in their heads.

    This place continues to be the place for objective Husky information and opinion. Fair and balanced.

    This board's meteoric rise and also DM.C's epic irreversible fail is more proof that outcome based central planning always fails.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    BlowItUp said:

    the fact that they hate this hire so much makes me feel more and more confident in Petersen.

    And lack of access is a nice bonus. Now there will be little doubt everything they'll be hearing is fiction.

    Petersen will quietly and directly go about his business. If he gets the players to buy in and trust him (he won't promote himself and his system like Sark did with empty platitudes), then 2014 may well become the year that was, and would have remained, elusive under Sark. If it happens, doogs will want to credit Sark, but I won't care. Doubt Petersen and his staff will either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LevelPar
    LevelPar Member Posts: 447
    Bleenor is even bitch slapping Dm.com boys.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I'll make us some sandwiches.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,584 Standard Supporter
    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    Tony

    Played by 90s MTV douchebag Dan Cortez
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BayDawg
    BayDawg Member Posts: 1,623
    TheHB said:

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I'll make us some sandwiches.

    Im down, man. Mark me down...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tracker
    tracker Member Posts: 866
    edited January 2014
    What I don't get about those guys is how they're all so concerned about CP not being able to recruit to the "Pac-12 level". Well, their boy Sark recruited to the Pac-12 level regularly and look at all the good that did.

    Coaching and player development > Recruiting rankings.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    BlowItUp said:

    The eld analogy ct that they hate this hire so much makes me feel more and more confident in Petersen.

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I grow so tired of you metro's and your seinfeld comparisons all the time. SEINFELD is the mans version of friends. You Fags prolly have that framed print of Kramer in all your rooms still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    tracker said:

    What I don't get about those guys is how they're all so concerned about CP not being able to recruit to the "Pac-12 level". Well, their boy Sark recruited to the Pac-12 level regularly and look at all the good that did.

    Coaching and player development > Recruiting rankings.

    you're just twisting what i am saying. if that's out here, i havent seen it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    BlowItUp said:

    The eld analogy ct that they hate this hire so much makes me feel more and more confident in Petersen.

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I grow so tired of you metro's and your seinfeld comparisons all the time. SEINFELD is the mans version of friends. You Fags prolly have that framed print of Kramer in all your rooms still.
    If you don't have that picture of Kramer then you should probably light yourself on fire already.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Hope one of you assholes are getting screen shots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Global
    Global Member Posts: 333
    Thanks for this enlightening update on Doogman. I was losing touch with that site, since we had not had a Doogman infatuation report for almost 8 hours.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    BlowItUp said:

    The eld analogy ct that they hate this hire so much makes me feel more and more confident in Petersen.

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I grow so tired of you metro's and your seinfeld comparisons all the time. SEINFELD is the mans version of friends. You Fags prolly have that framed print of Kramer in all your rooms still.
    why yes, yes I do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
    What's the fucking deal with sandwiches?

    youtube.com/watch?v=qtF5dMzAF2k

    TheHB said:

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I'll make us some sandwiches.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    Is Kim going bald ? "Low tweak" sounds like something happening in the genital region, not that there's anything wrong with that. Most times it's better not to guess....... about acronyms.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Global said:

    Thanks for this enlightening update on Doogman. I was losing touch with that site, since we had not had a Doogman infatuation report for almost 8 hours.

    You guys are missing the big picture.

    It's a clear as the other side of your face. Damone just may be a double agent sent by Kim's biz model scout team.

    I mean look what He did to Rat back in the day.


    You can lead a Dog to water but it doesn't mean he'll change his spots.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    LawDawg1 said:

    What's the fucking deal with sandwiches?

    youtube.com/watch?v=qtF5dMzAF2k



    TheHB said:

    creepycoug said:

    TheHB said:

    What's truly odd is the mancrush they all have on Sarkisian. It's a total jilted lover denial fest. It's actually kind of sad. Weird. But sad.

    Compare the Seinfeld episode in which George gets totally engrossed in a mancrush bromance with Elaine's cool, very good looking and very stupid boyfriend. Forget his name. That is Kim and Sarkesian right fucking there. Kim, goes without saying, is George.

    Also, I have no idea what low tweak is, and I often can't decode the greater-than-three letter acronyms. Ask around ... they'll tell you I'm a little slow on the uptake. Sorry. I try.
    I'll make us some sandwiches.
    you gotta watch the episode. George makes them for himself and Tony on a rock climb where, you guessed it, something goes wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    TMacDawg said:

    image

    Race has done it again!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    dnc said:

    TMacDawg said:

    image

    POTM
    I think it would have been better with the old, fat Elvis version.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter