More on the Don James - Chris Petersen comparison (what needs to be done)

1979 Don James beats dreck cupcakes first 5 games loses to a 6-6 ASU team and loses against all ranked opponents. Some how ends up in a Sun Bowl against #11 Texas and wins. I know you guys don't think you are cunty kids in adult bodies but you are. HH needs to be shut down, its a proverbial eddy circling in u dub loserville.

Although playing a few lightweights in the schedule like the Ballard Meteors, Gil Dobie had the best run, 58-0-3. Finally there is a plaque in his honor inside the Alaska Airlines Advertisement Arena (formerly Huskie Stadium)

RaceBannon said:

When the doogs start ripping James to cover for the current coach its time to start the search for a new one

UW can lose three this year and make the Rose Bowl

And if we? do I'll call it a success

This.

Doog James ripping is why many in the fan base deserve a reincarnation of Willingham. Bow Down to Petersen? It may be the beginning if he inflexibly doesn't change his attitude and approach.

HillsboroDuck said:

Homebrew_Dawg said:

RaceBannon said:

When the doogs start ripping James to cover for the current coach its time to start the search for a new one

UW can lose three this year and make the Rose Bowl

And if we? do I'll call it a success

This.

Doog James ripping is why many in the fan base deserve a reincarnation of Willingham. Bow Down to Petersen? It may be the beginning if he inflexibly doesn't change his attitude and approach.

STOp.

Pete has been bad this year but there's no possible world where he should be compared to Ty.

Stalin true?

If. A condition or supposition. I observe similar behavioral traits that are not nearly as severe in Petersen, but impede his becoming great at UW. Whether he needs more time, will manifest or not.

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

I thought that Petersen has the chance to be better than Don James

There is room for improvement on that record. The OP in this thread was more about realizing and changing than wanting to be just like Don James

But James could sit in Beno Bryant's house in South LA while gunfire was going on next door and CLOSE the fucking deal

DJ didn't close on the guys we? needed to win a NT until he'd been the coach here for 13 or 14 seasons.

It takes a minute

Chris Petersen is at UW for the money of a big school without the pressure to win.

“It’s hard in this league” used to be cute until the players believed it.

James wasn’t perfect but aspired to be. When he lost, he reinvented himself and his team. Pete not so much.

The Built for Life schtick carries enough cache to attract enough good players for 8-10 wins (with a shit shchedule) but not enough great ones by keeping Bob Gregory or holding on to Stausser or Pease an extra year.

This bored skewered Woodward for keeping Ty 1 year too long but Doogs, the majority of UW s fan base, give Pete a pass because he’s white and gives good soundbites.

Pete looks more and more like a slightly better Sark without the booze problem, and good for an extra win per season

HillsboroDuck said:

Baseman said:

Chris Petersen is at UW for the money of a big school without the pressure to win.

“It’s hard in this league” used to be cute until the players believed it.

James wasn’t perfect but aspired to be. When he lost, he reinvented himself and his team. Pete not so much.

The Built for Life schtick carries enough cache to attract enough good players for 8-10 wins (with a shit shchedule) but not enough great ones by keeping Bob Gregory or holding on to Stausser or Pease an extra year.

This bored skewered Woodward for keeping Ty 1 year too long but Doogs, the majority of UW s fan base, give Pete a pass because he’s white and gives good soundbites.

Pete looks more and more like a slightly better Sark without the booze problem, and good for an extra win per season

Comparing Pete to Ty and Sark?

Am I being whooshed?

Nope. Pete holds on to underperforming recruiters at the program’s expense, giving a big fuck you to the fans/donors.

Pete won with Sarks players. He’s 1-3 in Bowl games. Outside of his signature win at home against an injury ridden Stanford, he’s never won a big game. 5 years and counting.

This year, UW is 9-3 if they win out—doubtful.

9-3 or 8-4 in this league with this shit schedule? That’s Sarkish.

The players, in growing numbers, are already rumbling.

Pete’s a charlatan.

AZDuck said:

HillsboroDuck said:

Homebrew_Dawg said:

RaceBannon said:

When the doogs start ripping James to cover for the current coach its time to start the search for a new one

UW can lose three this year and make the Rose Bowl

And if we? do I'll call it a success

This.

Doog James ripping is why many in the fan base deserve a reincarnation of Willingham. Bow Down to Petersen? It may be the beginning if he inflexibly doesn't change his attitude and approach.

STOp.

Pete has been bad this year but there's no possible world where he should be compared to Ty.

he just needs more tim

To win a title? Sure.

To prove he's a couple tiers above Sarkingham? Not at all.

Baseman said:

Chris Petersen is at UW for the money of a big school without the pressure to win.

“It’s hard in this league” used to be cute until the players believed it.

James wasn’t perfect but aspired to be. When he lost, he reinvented himself and his team. Pete not so much.

The Built for Life schtick carries enough cache to attract enough good players for 8-10 wins (with a shit shchedule) but not enough great ones by keeping Bob Gregory or holding on to Stausser or Pease an extra year.

This bored skewered Woodward for keeping Ty 1 year too long but Doogs, the majority of UW s fan base, give Pete a pass because he’s white and gives good soundbites.

Pete looks more and more like a slightly better Sark without the booze problem, and good for an extra win per season

I'm not happy with Pete's shtick either. But pull your head out of your ass. Road blowouts were common as fuck under Sark, and a 9+ win team is substantially better than a 7 win team, since wins in conference matter way more than non-conference cupcakes. Pete is head and tails better than Sark, but the conference, recruiting and especially his QB play isn't static so the improvement has to be continuous.

Sark and Pete aren't even in the same league. That's just fucking stupid.

Someone is tanned, ready and rested to take over the helm of the goodship HUSKIIE!

RaceBannon said:

BennyBeaver said:

Someone is tanned, ready and rested to take over the helm of the goodship HUSKIIE!

Shit he's old now. Time flies. He's on CBSSN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV2MVGBmncc