Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The dull lifeless Huskies

13

Comments

  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076

    It seems like the defense is fine despite being ultra conservative.

    Pete needs to blow up the offense and start over from scratch. His team doesn't have the underdog chip like at Boise, he doesn't need to out scheme everyone with 1000 base sets and another few thousands motion variants

    Funny that you? pine for the days when you had the offensive consultant guru before He went Home to Fresno, when an overly complicated and cutesy playbook was the general complaint that we? had about Tedford the last few years He was with us
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,863 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    It seems like the defense is fine despite being ultra conservative.

    Pete needs to blow up the offense and start over from scratch. His team doesn't have the underdog chip like at Boise, he doesn't need to out scheme everyone with 1000 base sets and another few thousands motion variants

    Funny that you? pine for the days when you had the offensive consultant guru before He went Home to Fresno, when an overly complicated and cutesy playbook was the general complaint that we? had about Tedford the last few years He was with us
    @BearsWiin I was Nostradamus at the Meetup. And now you see why I'm adamant Babushka>Bush.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,135 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    BearsWiin said:

    It seems like the defense is fine despite being ultra conservative.

    Pete needs to blow up the offense and start over from scratch. His team doesn't have the underdog chip like at Boise, he doesn't need to out scheme everyone with 1000 base sets and another few thousands motion variants

    Funny that you? pine for the days when you had the offensive consultant guru before He went Home to Fresno, when an overly complicated and cutesy playbook was the general complaint that we? had about Tedford the last few years He was with us
    @BearsWiin I was Nostradamus at the Meetup. And now you see why I'm adamant Babushka>Bush.
    We told him how Cal would win to the letter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    4 years with the same slow-developing QB is inevitably too long and too predictable. Few QBs ever do better in their 3rd and especially their 4th year at the helm of a college offense. All strengths and weaknesses are known and predictable to the public, their team, and all their opponents. Jake does a few things better this year than prior years, but incremental progress isn't enough when surrounded by fast-rising sharks in the league who know your shit a lot better than you know there's. Any element of surprise is long, long gone, and the opposition knows every tendency.
    We're lucky Colorado was so shitty and Utah was unprepared, or UW would be 4-5 right now.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    We just saw your future without Gaskin in the offense. It’s not pretty.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    Doogles said:

    BearsWiin said:

    It seems like the defense is fine despite being ultra conservative.

    Pete needs to blow up the offense and start over from scratch. His team doesn't have the underdog chip like at Boise, he doesn't need to out scheme everyone with 1000 base sets and another few thousands motion variants

    Funny that you? pine for the days when you had the offensive consultant guru before He went Home to Fresno, when an overly complicated and cutesy playbook was the general complaint that we? had about Tedford the last few years He was with us
    @BearsWiin I was Nostradamus at the Meetup. And now you see why I'm adamant Babushka>Bush.
    Do you want a cookie?
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,418
    salemcoog said:

    We just saw your future without Gaskin in the offense. It’s not pretty.

    @StrongArmCobra has a five chapter response to this. You just wait.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    salemcoog said:

    We just saw your future without Gaskin in the offense. It’s not pretty.

    Running horizontal is special.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    salemcoog said:

    We just saw your future without Gaskin in the offense. It’s not pretty.

    @StrongArmCobra has a five chapter response to this. You just wait.
    "You're a fucking retard" is only 4 words.

  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    jecornel said:

    salemcoog said:

    We just saw your future without Gaskin in the offense. It’s not pretty.

    Running horizontal is special.
    Be glad our RBs don't follow Browning example and run backwards. Well at least not as often.