Class of 2019 Projections
Comments
-
We currently have 18 commits (excluding Ford) and your list gets us to 26 if we pull everybody ... also need to keep in mind Jordon Lolohea returning from his mission as well which adds 1 moreStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
That big of a class is doable provided we have roster space as we took 20 in last year’s class and with some of these guys being early enrollees they can be counted backwards.
Then the question is the counting math of of how do you get to 85 ... -
I think Jordan is going to be for 2021
-
Screenshotted to make fun of you after signing day!StrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
I feel good about Tuitele and Heimuli maybe a third in Wright or Foskey.
Other guys would be massive pulls for this staff.
-
Continued from prior post ...
If I give you all of the guys on the list except for Foskey, that puts the number up to 92 PRIOR to any early entrants, couch sales, or retirements
At the early entry level, there are a few candidates:
Taylor Rapp
Byron Murphy
Then you have couch sellers and/or medical retirement possibilities:
Quinten Pounds
Devin Burleson
Jason Scrempos
Jordan Chin
Myles Rice
Isaiah Gilchrist
Van Soderberg
If all go you’re looking at room for 2 more ...
However, when you look at the depth, particularly on D, there are also some massive holes that need to be addressed:
1) DL will almost exclusively be comprised of this class and those RS’ing this year + Levi ... finding a grad transfer would be huge here
2) All of the LB depth is going to sit in this class plus those RS’ing this year. You have some upper class guys in Wellington and Beavers (not mentioning Manu) but they struggle to stay healthy. Another area where a grad transfer would be good.
3) Barring a position switch plus Rapp/Murphy leaving early there’s the potential for a massive depth issue in 2020 depending on what Molden/Taylor/McKinney do (do any of them leave early???) ... currently there isn’t anybody on the DB depth chart for 2019 as a sophomore ... so it wouldn’t be the worst thing to add another number here unless we plan on having a MASSIVE 2020 class
BTW, speaking of 2020 class, offense will desperately need numbers at RB and TE ... particularly if we create a void in the 2019 class at TE
There’s also the who makes a potential position switch argument as well ... but given our LB/DB depth chart I think it’s reasonable to expect continued special teams challenges in 2019. -
I would, it's just that the composite is the basis for Bud Elliott's foundational research on the whole "need blue chips on at least half your roster to win the title".Swaye said:This is cool. But, why don't we all just agree to scrap this composite bullshit? ESPN is terrible and distorts the rankings too much. Just list the 247 scores, and while not perfect, it is better than including the faggots at ESPN who fuck it all up completely.
If we're tracking how we rate on his metric then we have to use the composite. If we're using the metric of our choosing then we're basically acknowledging the ratio is BS because it's based on a flawed premise anyway and we can stop worrying about it.
I'm good either way. Personally I much prefer the 247 ratings but obviously they like our? guys better so duh. -
Not that I'm aware of. He seems to project best as a SAM IMO but who knows. FWIW 247 has him as an ILB and Ah You as an OLB.guntlove said:@HillsboroDuck, Ecklund, Section14A, a Q???????
Who the fuck is @DNC?
Is Tuputala definitely playing OLB? For some reason I thought he was being recruited at ILB.
You think we're done at OLB? I was really hoping we could pull either Latu or Foskey.
Heimuli is a super important recruit for this class. Maybe the most important given how shitty our depth & talent is at that position. Really hope we can nail down that kid.
gunt.
As far as OLB is concerned I don't think we want to be done necessarily, but unless one of those two you mentioned jumps on bored I don't think we spend another scholly there given the quality we have the potential of pulling at other positions. I don't see us getting Foskey but Latu seems to be a legitimate chance. He would be huge.
Agree completely on Heimuli, especially given the To'oto'o ship seeming to sail. Calvert was a massive get though too. Heimuli is definitely bigger. -
This guess wasn't wildly off. I got one correct and nothing wrong (so far). I'm more convinced we're going to take a 2nd RB late to fill up the extra scholarships, so I'll call that a win too.Woof said:My guesses for what is left after Bandes:
Buelow
Vimahi
Heimuli
Wright
Latu
Chase
I'm feeling good about the top 3. I wanted to put Tuitele, but I am trying not to doog. Last two are my wildcards. Ruth is being coy about someone, he is visiting on 12/15, and we always pull a wild card out late. Also considered Foskey, but we don't really need a TE. I think we take Chase late when we miss on McDuffie and Wright.
Sleepers would be Quentin Moore or a RB not on our radar who has a great senior year and blows up.
I think we're done at OL. Bad feeling about Rhyan and the Vimahi ship appears to have sailed. I also feel way less confident on McDuffie than most - he liked a random fan tweet the other day saying he's going to Stanford if he gets admitted, and I think we are a fallback at best. I still think Chase's offer becomes commitable again late. I also think everyone is underplaying our chances with Latu. He's visiting on 12/15, and is deciding at the Poly bowl. We couldn't ask for a better close. If we pull one of the 5 stars, my guess is it is Ford, but I give it no more than a 25% chance.
My guess at a close:
Tuitele (if you don't count him already)
Heimuli
Latu
Chase
2nd RB (McMillan?) -
I listed seven guys which would be a full class of 25. Fowler, McMillan, etc, could be grey shirt candidates or simply passed on if this best case scenario plays out. I don't really care about the numbers. Big boy programs take 25 guys every cycle and figure it out later.Tequilla said:
We currently have 18 commits (excluding Ford) and your list gets us to 26 if we pull everybody ... also need to keep in mind Jordon Lolohea returning from his mission as well which adds 1 moreStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
That big of a class is doable provided we have roster space as we took 20 in last year’s class and with some of these guys being early enrollees they can be counted backwards.
Then the question is the counting math of of how do you get to 85 ... -
A bunch of guys already on our commit list chose UW over a struggling USC. Why is it impossible that this trend continues?WeakarmCobra said:
U r making big assumptions that these 18/19 years going to make a smart decisions. I am sorry, I am ~30 still make dumb fucking decision, I don’t expect these overglorified and pampered jocks to make good decisionStrongArmCobra said:
Not delusional this time around. If you were one of these elite recruits would you go to USC over UW right now? You'd have to be stupid as fuck right? Their current coaching staff is trash so if you're going to USC you're either going to have a shit coaching staff that can't develop players and can't game plan or a new coaching staff that you didn't sign up for that might also turn out to be shit. UW is in prime position to be a safety net for these elite recruits that would traditionally go to SC but won't because of the instability there.WeakarmCobra said:
Obk level delusional, but if happens I will donate $129 to have obk banned for a weekStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
UW recruits OKG's which for the most part are pretty smart and mature kids who see the big picture and are capable of making good decisions. -
I can justify why you can use 247 rankings while still using Bud Elliott's metric that was founded on using composite by writing a huge @Tequilla special of "I was told there would be no maff." or you can just believe me.HillsboroDuck said:
I would, it's just that the composite is the basis for Bud Elliott's foundational research on the whole "need blue chips on at least half your roster to win the title".Swaye said:This is cool. But, why don't we all just agree to scrap this composite bullshit? ESPN is terrible and distorts the rankings too much. Just list the 247 scores, and while not perfect, it is better than including the faggots at ESPN who fuck it all up completely.
If we're tracking how we rate on his metric then we have to use the composite. If we're using the metric of our choosing then we're basically acknowledging the ratio is BS because it's based on a flawed premise anyway and we can stop worrying about it.
I'm good either way. Personally I much prefer the 247 ratings but obviously they like our? guys better so duh.
TLDR version is that there's "noise" in a specific subset of the data which applies to certain regions/teams(us?) which are themselves outliers and therefore don't have much impact on the correlation value of the overall population/metric. This is not an unusual adjustment for a subset of data that has a measurement error for a population with an established correlation.
TTLDR Statisticians dump outliers and adjust measurements all the tim. It's cul. -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
I can justify why you can use 247 rankings while still using Bud Elliott's metric that was founded on using composite by writing a huge @Tequilla special of "I was told there would be no maff." or you can just believe me.HillsboroDuck said:
I would, it's just that the composite is the basis for Bud Elliott's foundational research on the whole "need blue chips on at least half your roster to win the title".Swaye said:This is cool. But, why don't we all just agree to scrap this composite bullshit? ESPN is terrible and distorts the rankings too much. Just list the 247 scores, and while not perfect, it is better than including the faggots at ESPN who fuck it all up completely.
If we're tracking how we rate on his metric then we have to use the composite. If we're using the metric of our choosing then we're basically acknowledging the ratio is BS because it's based on a flawed premise anyway and we can stop worrying about it.
I'm good either way. Personally I much prefer the 247 ratings but obviously they like our? guys better so duh.
TLDR version is that there's "noise" in a specific subset of the data which applies to certain regions/teams(us?) which are themselves outliers and therefore don't have much impact on the correlation value of the overall population/metric. This is not an unusual adjustment for a subset of data that has a measurement error for a population with an established correlation.
TTLDR Statisticians dump outliers and adjust measurements all the tim. It's cul.
Engrish motherfucker!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
I can justify why you can use 247 rankings while still using Bud Elliott's metric that was founded on using composite by writing a huge @Tequilla special of "I was told there would be no maff." or you can just believe me.HillsboroDuck said:
I would, it's just that the composite is the basis for Bud Elliott's foundational research on the whole "need blue chips on at least half your roster to win the title".Swaye said:This is cool. But, why don't we all just agree to scrap this composite bullshit? ESPN is terrible and distorts the rankings too much. Just list the 247 scores, and while not perfect, it is better than including the faggots at ESPN who fuck it all up completely.
If we're tracking how we rate on his metric then we have to use the composite. If we're using the metric of our choosing then we're basically acknowledging the ratio is BS because it's based on a flawed premise anyway and we can stop worrying about it.
I'm good either way. Personally I much prefer the 247 ratings but obviously they like our? guys better so duh.
TLDR version is that there's "noise" in a specific subset of the data which applies to certain regions/teams(us?) which are themselves outliers and therefore don't have much impact on the correlation value of the overall population/metric. This is not an unusual adjustment for a subset of data that has a measurement error for a population with an established correlation.
TTLDR Statisticians dump outliers and adjust measurements all the tim. It's cul. -
Totally flawed ...StrongArmCobra said:
I listed seven guys which would be a full class of 25. Fowler, McMillan, etc, could be grey shirt candidates or simply passed on if this best case scenario plays out. I don't really care about the numbers. Big boy programs take 25 guys every cycle and figure it out later.Tequilla said:
We currently have 18 commits (excluding Ford) and your list gets us to 26 if we pull everybody ... also need to keep in mind Jordon Lolohea returning from his mission as well which adds 1 moreStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
That big of a class is doable provided we have roster space as we took 20 in last year’s class and with some of these guys being early enrollees they can be counted backwards.
Then the question is the counting math of of how do you get to 85 ...
You have to fit the numbers into the context of what THIS program does as Pete doesn’t pull scholarships ... that’s a huge part of his package to recruits
I’m fairly confident that we can get in the 24-25 range if we want ...
But we also have holes on our roster that need to be filled ... which means some on your list are likely out -
He doesn’t pull scholarships, but he’s also not obligated to give a kid a 5th year. Also expect Van Winkle to medically retire if he hasn’t already.Tequilla said:
Totally flawed ...StrongArmCobra said:
I listed seven guys which would be a full class of 25. Fowler, McMillan, etc, could be grey shirt candidates or simply passed on if this best case scenario plays out. I don't really care about the numbers. Big boy programs take 25 guys every cycle and figure it out later.Tequilla said:
We currently have 18 commits (excluding Ford) and your list gets us to 26 if we pull everybody ... also need to keep in mind Jordon Lolohea returning from his mission as well which adds 1 moreStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up!
That big of a class is doable provided we have roster space as we took 20 in last year’s class and with some of these guys being early enrollees they can be counted backwards.
Then the question is the counting math of of how do you get to 85 ...
You have to fit the numbers into the context of what THIS program does as Pete doesn’t pull scholarships ... that’s a huge part of his package to recruits
I’m fairly confident that we can get in the 24-25 range if we want ...
But we also have holes on our roster that need to be filled ... which means some on your list are likely out
Think it would be tough to take that many though... -
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!1!(!)!guntlove said:@HillsboroDuck, Ecklund, Section14A, a Q???????
Who the fuck is @DNC?
Is Tuputala definitely playing OLB? For some reason I thought he was being recruited at ILB.
You think we're done at OLB? I was really hoping we could pull either Latu or Foskey.
Heimuli is a super important recruit for this class. Maybe the most important given how shitty our depth & talent is at that position. Really hope we can nail down that kid.
gunt. -
Welcome to the past nine years.StrongArmCobra said:
Not delusional this time around. If you were one of these elite recruits would you go to USC over UW right now? You'd have to be stupid as fuck right? Their current coaching staff is trash so if you're going to USC you're either going to have a shit coaching staff that can't develop players and can't game plan or a new coaching staff that you didn't sign up for that might also turn out to be shit. UW is in prime position to be a safety net for these elite recruits that would traditionally go to SC but won't because of the instability there.WeakarmCobra said:
Obk level delusional, but if happens I will donate $129 to have obk banned for a weekStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up! -
Yeah, but its really, really bad this last one.Baseman said:
Welcome to the past nine years.StrongArmCobra said:
Not delusional this time around. If you were one of these elite recruits would you go to USC over UW right now? You'd have to be stupid as fuck right? Their current coaching staff is trash so if you're going to USC you're either going to have a shit coaching staff that can't develop players and can't game plan or a new coaching staff that you didn't sign up for that might also turn out to be shit. UW is in prime position to be a safety net for these elite recruits that would traditionally go to SC but won't because of the instability there.WeakarmCobra said:
Obk level delusional, but if happens I will donate $129 to have obk banned for a weekStrongArmCobra said:UW will finish with:
Daniel Heimuli: UW lean
Faatui Tuitele: UW lean
Stephon Wright: UW lean IMO
Isaiah Foskey: UW vs Notre Dame, Notre Dame has yet to beat us for a guy so why should I think this time will be different?
Sean Rhyan: USC's O-line is trash. They're one of the worst rushing teams in the country. If Helton isn't fired, their O-line coach definitely will be. Where else is he going to go if O-line player development at USC sucks? Huff is probably the coolest O-line coach recruiting him and probably has the best relationship with him.
Bru McCoy: USC coaching sucks, he and his dad love UW and Coach Pete.
Kyle Ford: USC coaching sucks. He has a bunch of homies on the team at UW already. Would fit right in and knows he'll get developed here.
and maybe Drew Fowler or the 3* BTE who hasn't been offered yet if they have room.
Doog it Up! -
I just think it is so well established that ESPN vastly underrates west coast talent that it completely distorts the compostie results, particularly for west coast teams. Again, 247 isn't perfect, but they seem to be the most balanced of the bunch. So my perception is to go with the one that reflects the best balance across the nation, and eliminate a KNOWN distortion. None of them are perfectly accurate, but we know ESPN, when factoring in WC recruiting, is the LEAST accurate.HillsboroDuck said:
I would, it's just that the composite is the basis for Bud Elliott's foundational research on the whole "need blue chips on at least half your roster to win the title".Swaye said:This is cool. But, why don't we all just agree to scrap this composite bullshit? ESPN is terrible and distorts the rankings too much. Just list the 247 scores, and while not perfect, it is better than including the faggots at ESPN who fuck it all up completely.
If we're tracking how we rate on his metric then we have to use the composite. If we're using the metric of our choosing then we're basically acknowledging the ratio is BS because it's based on a flawed premise anyway and we can stop worrying about it.
I'm good either way. Personally I much prefer the 247 ratings but obviously they like our? guys better so duh.
After singing day all I look at is the 247 rankings, and listen to what all the smart people here have to say, and then I base my opinions on that. Also, fuck ESPN all day e'ry day. -
@DNC is an institution at HH. He and @Swaye have a relationship that can't be labeled. hthguntlove said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!1!(!)!guntlove said:@HillsboroDuck, Ecklund, Section14A, a Q???????
Who the fuck is @DNC?
Is Tuputala definitely playing OLB? For some reason I thought he was being recruited at ILB.
You think we're done at OLB? I was really hoping we could pull either Latu or Foskey.
Heimuli is a super important recruit for this class. Maybe the most important given how shitty our depth & talent is at that position. Really hope we can nail down that kid.
gunt. -
Hurtful on behalf @UW_Doog_BotCrawfish said:
@DNC is an institution at HH. He and @Swaye have a relationship that can't be labeled. hthguntlove said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!1!(!)!guntlove said:@HillsboroDuck, Ecklund, Section14A, a Q???????
Who the fuck is @DNC?
Is Tuputala definitely playing OLB? For some reason I thought he was being recruited at ILB.
You think we're done at OLB? I was really hoping we could pull either Latu or Foskey.
Heimuli is a super important recruit for this class. Maybe the most important given how shitty our depth & talent is at that position. Really hope we can nail down that kid.
gunt. -
To be fair, he’s actually old enough to be a freshman, but he was held back a year. Therefore, Helton deserves a new 10 year deal for being this successful with a QB who is a legitimate retard.HoustonHusky said:First off, Helton is getting unfairly criticized. How can you expect to win with a QB that should be a Sr in high school? If he is winning less than 6 games when JT is a Jr then might, maybe, but people are being completely unfair to that guy. Completely unfair.
-
@JacobSirmonDawg, true?!! JT Daniels age isn't a rare thing. Parents of athletes have been holding back their sons for awhile. The only thing that is rare about what Daniels did was skipping his senior year of high school.Fear_Boner said:
To be fair, he’s actually old enough to be a freshman, but he was held back a year. Therefore, Helton deserves a new 10 year deal for being this successful with a QB who is a legitimate retard.HoustonHusky said:First off, Helton is getting unfairly criticized. How can you expect to win with a QB that should be a Sr in high school? If he is winning less than 6 games when JT is a Jr then might, maybe, but people are being completely unfair to that guy. Completely unfair.
-
One could say, it dare not speaks its nameCrawfish said:
@DNC is an institution at HH. He and @Swaye have a relationship that can't be labeled. hthguntlove said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!1!(!)!guntlove said:@HillsboroDuck, Ecklund, Section14A, a Q???????
Who the fuck is @DNC?
Is Tuputala definitely playing OLB? For some reason I thought he was being recruited at ILB.
You think we're done at OLB? I was really hoping we could pull either Latu or Foskey.
Heimuli is a super important recruit for this class. Maybe the most important given how shitty our depth & talent is at that position. Really hope we can nail down that kid.
gunt.
-
@Swaye ya better keep your bitches in check. I got feeling someone going to get butthurt @HillsboroDuck @UW_Doog_Bot @dnc hardy har har
-
Literally everyone is going to decommit.
-
There’s the DDY I know and love, hey man 👋
-
If the mystery decommit is who I’ve heard it is I’m going to laught at you feebs.Dennis_DeYoung said:Literally everyone is going to decommit.
Lolololol -
It's EVERYONE.gifHillsboroDuck said:
If the mystery decommit is who I’ve heard it is I’m going to laught at you feebs.Dennis_DeYoung said:Literally everyone is going to decommit.
Lolololol -
Except the whites of courseDennis_DeYoung said:
It's EVERYONE.gifHillsboroDuck said:
If the mystery decommit is who I’ve heard it is I’m going to laught at you feebs.Dennis_DeYoung said:Literally everyone is going to decommit.
Lolololol -
Mystery decommit? 🤣 I’m going to punch both of you in the ovaries if your non-sense wills this one into fruition.
-
Ovaries? We're all men here, good sir (and @Doog_de_Jour, of course).dirtysouwfdawg said:Mystery decommit? 🤣 I’m going to punch both of you in the ovaries if your non-sense wills this one into fruition.
HardcoreHuskyBathouse.jpg.
