TSiO Podcast #57: Are we fine enough? Are we wild enough?
Comments
-
"Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.
-
Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.NorwegianHusky said:"Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky -
Did I get a shout out
-
You got @MrsPetersen ... the gauntlet has been thrown...
-
We lost two games this year. Fuck off.PurpleJ said:
Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.NorwegianHusky said:"Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky -
Flagged. Bashing @NorwegianHusky is ok, but bashing teenage dick is notPurpleJ said:
Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.NorwegianHusky said:"Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky
@NorwegianHusky -
Coker, shame on you on many fronts. If you kept your fucking site up you'd know how many 4*s are on your roster. Can't believe #1 you didn't know and #2 you had to ask. While we're at it, what the fuck happened to theseasonisover.com? It's just gone. No warning, gone. Bitch!
And calling Mrs. Petersen the #1 female fan? Sexist pig fucker. CHRIST. Come on.
Mrs. Petersen - shame on you for putting up with it. I think you're a hell of a fan/analyst/know it all regardless what's between your legs.
Coker- don't let Dennis bully you. You can take him and he'd love it.
Interesting hawt recruiting talk. I mean that. Great pod Lady and gentlemen.
It's nice for me to get back to listening regularly, I missed one or two.
Dennis - you need to go out and get an orifice or two stuffed. My number is easy to get. -- now all you bored guys who think you're hetero just remember every time you force your pear body, harry belly self on a female they know they just have to endure it for a minute and half. Small price to pay for a nice night out.
Doogs - get back to winning, I need help taking the North. -
None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.YellowSnow said:I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.
Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.
I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?
Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.
So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).
So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean. -
Welcome to three years ago.YellowSnow said:
None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.YellowSnow said:I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.
Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.
I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?
Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.
So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).
So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean. -
No one here ever repeats anything that has been said 23,000 times previouslyDennis_DeYoung said:
Welcome to three years ago.YellowSnow said:
None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.YellowSnow said:I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.
Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.
I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?
Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.
So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).
So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
