Kim is not good at hiding his agenda

Comments
-
Funny how that piece of shit for years called us UCLA fans(he was partly right on that) who just wanted UW to fail to say we were right.
Now he's doing the exact same thing he bitched about us for years. He is going to be a pseudo USC fan while hoping Petersen fails.
I haven't wanted a UW to succeed this badly since Rick. I'd love for Petersen to succeed as UW continues to win games and Kim continues to be shut out.
Any time Kim is in misery makes the world a better place. Fuck that guy seriously. -
Petersen must have taken a dump in Kim's coat which he "accidentally left" in his office. Or at least we can only hope.
Sorry you won't have any dude bros to chill and kick it with for your access Kimmy. You weren't going to get laid hanging out with those guys anyways. -
Somebody with aids needs to just follow Kimmie out to his Prius after a dub pub event and rape him. Then we can quit talking about him. I'd say the s a me about fetters but nobody could do it. He's just to damb hideous. Ektard? He'll just wither away without Kimmie to employ him
-
He_Needs_More_Time said:
Funny how that piece of shit for years called us UCLA fans(he was partly right on that) who just wanted UW to fail to say we were right.
Now he's doing the exact same thing he bitched about us for years. He is going to be a pseudo USC fan while hoping Petersen fails.
I haven't wanted a UW to succeed this badly since Rick. I'd love for Petersen to succeed as UW continues to win games and Kim continues to be shut out.
Any time Kim is in misery makes the world a better place. Fuck that guy seriously.
More_cock, listen to you! You really are getting crazy . Did you go see your church father and ask for forgiveness for sinning? Never heard you talk like this. Wash your mouth out with soap dude. Hope your wife doesn't find out
-
Kim was probably following SWS around to Joeys hoping to wing man his way into a blonde
-
Thanks for reading.
-
Sark MIGHT be successful at USC ... but if he is it's tied as much to being at USC as anything else ...
I can tell you every USC fan I ran into in Vegas wasn't particularly thrilled with the Sark hire and most had a nervous laugh when I said "thank you" for taking him away from us ...
The fucker couldn't win more than 5 conference games in 5 years at Washington ... that's mediocre at best as a coach.
Sark's a great guy if you think having fun means banging blondes, getting drunk, and dude brah'ing ...
Sark's a shitty coach if you think winning and winning big is fun. -
They probably were nervously laughing because they didn't want to talk football. They wanted you to go away so they could start sniffing some lines and scouting for some hookers.Tequilla said:Sark MIGHT be successful at USC ... but if he is it's tied as much to being at USC as anything else ...
I can tell you every USC fan I ran into in Vegas wasn't particularly thrilled with the Sark hire and most had a nervous laugh when I said "thank you" for taking him away from us ...
The fucker couldn't win more than 5 conference games in 5 years at Washington ... that's mediocre at best as a coach.
Sark's a great guy if you think having fun means banging blondes, getting drunk, and dude brah'ing ...
Sark's a shitty coach if you think winning and winning big is fun.
Banging blondes, getting drunk, and dude brah'ing is fun, even though I prefer brunettes. I just don't want my team's coach doing that when he's barely a .500 coach.
-
Theres a difference between banging blondes and doing coke in your 20's while having some shitty desk job and making millions in your 30s (while married) coaching a football team with a bunch of young players.RoadDawg55 said:
They probably were nervously laughing because they didn't want to talk football. They wanted you to go away so they could start sniffing some lines and scouting for some hookers.Tequilla said:Sark MIGHT be successful at USC ... but if he is it's tied as much to being at USC as anything else ...
I can tell you every USC fan I ran into in Vegas wasn't particularly thrilled with the Sark hire and most had a nervous laugh when I said "thank you" for taking him away from us ...
The fucker couldn't win more than 5 conference games in 5 years at Washington ... that's mediocre at best as a coach.
Sark's a great guy if you think having fun means banging blondes, getting drunk, and dude brah'ing ...
Sark's a shitty coach if you think winning and winning big is fun.
Banging blondes, getting drunk, and dude brah'ing is fun, even though I prefer brunettes. I just don't want my team's coach doing that when he's barely a .500 coach.
I also prefer brunettes. Blondes have a higher rate of "dead fish" to them. I also dated a psycho bitch who was blonde. -
FADE IN
INT. JOEY'S BAR & GRILL - NIGHT
Sitting in the corner booth, Seven, Holt, Nansen, and Ossai are throwing back slippery nipples with BL Lime backs. Seven has a waitress on his lap. All are laughing and having a good time. Kim is sitting in the high chair at the end of the table, desperately trying to keep up with the conversation.
SWS
"Hey Kim, why don't you go buy us another round?"
KIM
"Sure thing SS (he likes to call him SS)! Coming right up!"
SWS and crew head across the street without telling Kim.
Kim turns around to see that everyone has left.
KIM
"Dang! Now what am I going to do with five glasses of syrah?"
SCENE -
Kim has made his "career" out of gargling the balls of two of the worst coaches in UW's modern history.
If Petersen does nothing more than cut off Kim's precious access and ruin the little faggot, before he even wins or coaches his first game, the man if my fucking hero! -
The subject should read "Kim is not good at hiding his sexual preferences"
HTH -
Latest: Kim says Petersen was a good hire but it is yet to be seen if he can recruit at the "elite" level the previous coach did. Also, unlike some people, he knows Sark was a great coach and not many people could have done what he did after Ty. We should all be appreciative and root like hell for USC when they play Oregon
-
Go Ducks!bananasnblondes said:Latest: Kim says Petersen was a good hire but it is yet to be seen if he can recruit at the "elite" level the previous coach did. Also, unlike some people, he knows Sark was a great coach and not many people could have done what he did after Ty. We should all be appreciative and root like hell for USC when they play Oregon
-
water is wet
-
They were on the sark train. Every criticism over the last few years resulted in banning. Now they are criticizing and trying to undermine Petersen so they can be right. HHBs will be proven right...again
Fuck off Kim. You're part of the problem. Embarrassing. -
Jesus.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Somebody with aids needs to just follow Kimmie out to his Prius after a dub pub event and rape him. Then we can quit talking about him. I'd say the s a me about fetters but nobody could do it. He's just to damb hideous. Ektard? He'll just wither away without Kimmie to employ him
-
It is rather hilarious that they are in wait and see mode on a 92-12 coach but proclaiming Sark the greatest coach ever after one KICK ASS! presser.MikeDamone said:They were on the sark train. Every criticism over the last few years resulted in banning. Now they are criticizing and trying to undermine Petersen so they can be right. HHBs will be proven right...again
Fuck off Kim. You're part of the problem. Embarrassing.
How if you openly questioned the Doogs proclaiming Sark as the savior you were banned instantly no warning. Just done!
Now all due to Petersen keeping these fucks at arms length they want him to fail. Even some Doogs in here like Passion are questioning Petersen's recruiting already when he was on the job only a week.
Sure the class isn't great now but Petersen has already signed four kids in a short amount of time. He is busting his ass unlike the two previous coaches who chose to go on Vacation or to coach for another school for FREE PUB!
Petersen may end up bombing and we'll be the first ones to point it out if that day comes. Unlike the fucktards at Doogman we don't care about access. We care about results, I have a feeling Petersen is going to deliver those results.
Until then Fuck you, Fuck me, Fuck everyone and especially Fuck Kim with a rusty cheese-grater. -
And, we now likely have a coach who will be here for the rest of his career. Baird's wet dream cums true. Petersen is secret squirrel and the 3 stooges are going to have to cum up with something other than name dropping and regurgitating go Huskies practice reports. I love watching those clowns squirm.
-
Petersen could possibly be our dream come true.Barney said:And, we now likely have a coach who will be here for the rest of his career. Baird's wet dream cums true. Petersen is secret squirrel and the 3 stooges are going to have to cum up with something other than name dropping and regurgitating go Huskies practice reports. I love watching those clowns squirm.
A guy who isn't a clown who wins. Also a guy who will keep Doogman away.
I would love for UW to start being a powerhouse program while living in a life of abundance seeing Doogman crash and burn.
-
This all just shows how moronic those clowns are. Wins mean profits for those idiots and they don't even know it. But hey, gotta stick with the agenda.
-
It would be worth a screen capture for Biggus Dickus. In one thread Kim says "Petersen has never recruited the type of players UW would need to win in the PAC 12.". Another poster says "you mean like the 17 BSU players in the NFL compared to UW's 12?"
-
T- minus 53 seconds til poof.bananasnblondes said:It would be worth a screen capture for Biggus Dickus. In one thread Kim says "Petersen has never recruited the type of players UW would need to win in the PAC 12.". Another poster says "you mean like the 17 BSU players in the NFL compared to UW's 12?"
-
What are the biggest arguments against Petersen at this point? That he hasn't won at a BCS level? That he hasn't recruited at the BCS level? And that he's not a flashy, sound-biting, awesome, kick-ass presser kind of guy?
The argument that he hasn't won at a BCS level is probably a fair one to make until he does. However, his career record suggests that he's won and won big when competing against his peer level. I don't think anybody expects that he's going to win 90% of his games in the PAC, but even if he's at 70% going forward, I think everybody would be more than happy what those results would lead to.
The recruiting at a BCS level is similar to the coaching. It's apples and oranges. One thing that he's proven to be able to do is develop talent. Many are bagging on the fact that at this point Petersen isn't doing anything more than getting verbals from 3-star kids. What most miss is that the success of a program is often driven by these "boring" 3-star kids developing and forming a basis of solid performance for the program. The difference then becomes the kind of elite players that you are able to surround the foundation with to rise the program to a championship level. Not every player can be an all-star on a team ... in fact, that's a recipe for disaster.
To the argument that Petersen isn't a flashy enough coach, let's look at the coaches in the current Top 10:
1) Florida State - Jimbo Fisher: The foundation of Florida State's success is that they dominate people on the OL/DL. They are a top 25 rushing team in the country averaging over 200 yards per game and a top 15 defensive team against the run giving up just over 100 yards per game.
2) Auburn - Gus Malzahn: Everybody wants to look at what he does with the spread and think that he's all flash. The balance of their run game still comes up the middle and they use their explosive runs to the outside to get you just spread out enough to make the middle runs work. He might have some flash to him, but at the end of the day, he's all about making sure that his bigs outperform your bigs.
3) Alabama - Nick Saban: Personality isn't what he's known for - cold, calculating, ruthless winning he is
4) Michigan St - Mark Dantonio: His teams are built on having one of the better defenses in the country, a bruising running game built off of strong OL play, and QBs that are adept at making the plays required by them. This isn't a flashy team, but a highly effective team.
5) Stanford - David Shaw: Physical running game combined with a hit you in the mouth defense. Not flashy ... highly effective.
6) Baylor - Art Briles: Perhaps the first coach on this list that is more of a flash coach than a physical coach (unless you throw Malzahn into the flash category). However, Baylor is a Top 25 run offense and run defense so they are not just a flashy team w/o substance.
7) Ohio State - Urban Legend: He's famous for turning Tebow Time into a multi-championship team. He's known for running the ball. He's known for physical defense. The fact that his Ohio St teams have had some defensive issues you know will get fixed in time as his recruits continue to dominate the program. BTW, Ohio St was a Top 7 team in the country in both rushing offense/defense.
8) Missouri - Gary Pinkel: DJ pedigree ... nothing more needs to be said.
9) South Caorlina - Ol' Ball Coach: Let's just say that he's been around long enough to know that you can't be the Ol' Ball Coach without rolling up your sleeves from time to time
10) Oregon - Mark Helfrich: We don't know enough about Helfrich to know much ... what we do know about the Oregon program though is that when they get hit in the mouth, they tend to back away.
Bottom line, if you want to be a Top 10 team, you are far more likely to be there by being willing to not only pop somebody in the mouth, but to fight back when someone tries to KO you. If you're soft, you'll fall on your face. Petersen's teams have consistently shown over time that when you hit them in the mouth, they get right back up and take their shots. Sark? Not so much. -
Fucking A Tequilla!
-
Holy fuck I'm about to take the gloves off and fucking roll and get in a pissing match over how long this post is.Tequilla said:What are the biggest arguments against Petersen at this point? That he hasn't won at a BCS level? That he hasn't recruited at the BCS level? And that he's not a flashy, sound-biting, awesome, kick-ass presser kind of guy?
The argument that he hasn't won at a BCS level is probably a fair one to make until he does. However, his career record suggests that he's won and won big when competing against his peer level. I don't think anybody expects that he's going to win 90% of his games in the PAC, but even if he's at 70% going forward, I think everybody would be more than happy what those results would lead to.
The recruiting at a BCS level is similar to the coaching. It's apples and oranges. One thing that he's proven to be able to do is develop talent. Many are bagging on the fact that at this point Petersen isn't doing anything more than getting verbals from 3-star kids. What most miss is that the success of a program is often driven by these "boring" 3-star kids developing and forming a basis of solid performance for the program. The difference then becomes the kind of elite players that you are able to surround the foundation with to rise the program to a championship level. Not every player can be an all-star on a team ... in fact, that's a recipe for disaster.
To the argument that Petersen isn't a flashy enough coach, let's look at the coaches in the current Top 10:
1) Florida State - Jimbo Fisher: The foundation of Florida State's success is that they dominate people on the OL/DL. They are a top 25 rushing team in the country averaging over 200 yards per game and a top 15 defensive team against the run giving up just over 100 yards per game.
2) Auburn - Gus Malzahn: Everybody wants to look at what he does with the spread and think that he's all flash. The balance of their run game still comes up the middle and they use their explosive runs to the outside to get you just spread out enough to make the middle runs work. He might have some flash to him, but at the end of the day, he's all about making sure that his bigs outperform your bigs.
3) Alabama - Nick Saban: Personality isn't what he's known for - cold, calculating, ruthless winning he is
4) Michigan St - Mark Dantonio: His teams are built on having one of the better defenses in the country, a bruising running game built off of strong OL play, and QBs that are adept at making the plays required by them. This isn't a flashy team, but a highly effective team.
5) Stanford - David Shaw: Physical running game combined with a hit you in the mouth defense. Not flashy ... highly effective.
6) Baylor - Art Briles: Perhaps the first coach on this list that is more of a flash coach than a physical coach (unless you throw Malzahn into the flash category). However, Baylor is a Top 25 run offense and run defense so they are not just a flashy team w/o substance.
7) Ohio State - Urban Legend: He's famous for turning Tebow Time into a multi-championship team. He's known for running the ball. He's known for physical defense. The fact that his Ohio St teams have had some defensive issues you know will get fixed in time as his recruits continue to dominate the program. BTW, Ohio St was a Top 7 team in the country in both rushing offense/defense.
8) Missouri - Gary Pinkel: DJ pedigree ... nothing more needs to be said.
9) South Caorlina - Ol' Ball Coach: Let's just say that he's been around long enough to know that you can't be the Ol' Ball Coach without rolling up your sleeves from time to time
10) Oregon - Mark Helfrich: We don't know enough about Helfrich to know much ... what we do know about the Oregon program though is that when they get hit in the mouth, they tend to back away.
Bottom line, if you want to be a Top 10 team, you are far more likely to be there by being willing to not only pop somebody in the mouth, but to fight back when someone tries to KO you. If you're soft, you'll fall on your face. Petersen's teams have consistently shown over time that when you hit them in the mouth, they get right back up and take their shots. Sark? Not so much. -
Only bringing out the long poasts when needed to shoot down the idea that the flash isn't what builds programs and wins at a high level.
-
It was a solid post, but there is no need for it to be that long. The only part I would disagree about is that you can't have every player be a star. This isn't basketball. I will take a team full of stars (future NFL players) in football.Tequilla said:Only bringing out the long poasts when needed to shoot down the idea that the flash isn't what builds programs and wins at a high level.
-
-
Thing about stars is that you give them the ability to freelance long enough to make the big plays necessary. It's why having stars works in basketball ... their ability to influence the game is at such a higher percentage of the total action on the court.
In football, guys that go out and act on their own often run the risk of compromising the common good. Let's say that you have a difference maker on defense ... you can scheme around his tendencies to gamble, get himself out of position, etc. such that you are able to maximize his strengths to make huge plays but at the same time provide the appropriate cover for the holes that he leaves. Same thing on offense with a skill position player ... you want to give them the ability to take advantage of what they are seeing, but you can't have everybody doing that otherwise it's unmitigated chaos.
While I want the best players possible, I also want guys that are going to do their job and not try to do everything. At the college level, I don't believe that enough high end players often view themselves as just doing their job and if you are an elite player you want to go get your glory. Only at the NFL level do I really feel that the elite players understand that what makes you elite is doing your job down in and down out and trusting that everybody around you will do the same.