Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Some Chris Petersen digits
digits
Member Posts: 1,870
• Record Versus Ranked Opponents: *** 8-13; 38 Win % ***
- 9.27.14; v Stanford (16); 20-13; L
- 10.18.14; @ 0regon (9); 45-20; L
- 10.25.14; v ASU (14); 24-10; L
- 11.8.14; v UCLA (18); 44-30; L
- 11.15.14; @ UA (14); 27-26; L
- 9.4.15; @ BSU (23); 16-13; L
- 10.8.15; @ USC (17); 17-12; W
- 10.24.15; @ Stanford (10); 31-14; L
- 11.7.15; v Utah (12); 34-23; L
- 11.27.15; WSU (20); 45-10; W
- 9.30.16; v Stanford (7); 44-6; W
- 10.29.16; @ Utah (17); 31-24; W
- 11.12.16; v USC (20); 26-13; L
- 11.25.16; WSU (23); 45-17; W
- 12.2.16; Colorado (8); 41-10; W
- 12.31.16; Bama (1); 24-7; L
- 11.25.17; v WSU (13); 41-14; W
- 12.30.17; n Penn State (9); 35-28; L
- 9.1.18; n Auburn (9); 21-16; L
- 9.29.18; v BYU (20); 35-7; W
- 10.13.18; @ 0regon (17); 30-27; L
Notes: Win versus highest-ranked opponent= Stanford (7); loss versus lowest-ranked opponent= BSU (23); if it weren't for beating 3 ranked WSU teams, record would be 5-16; 23 Win %; with Browning under Center, UW is 8-8; 50 Win % versus ranked opponents
• Games Decided by 3 Points or Less: *** 2-3; 40 Win % ***
- 8.30.14; @ Hawai'i; 17-16; W
- 11.15.14; @ Arizona; 27-26; L
- 9.4.15; @ Boise St; 16-13; L
- 11.18.17; v Utah; 33-30; W
- 10.13.18; @ 0regon (17); 30-27; L
Notes: Of these games decided by 3 points or less, only win that could be considered "quality" is Utah; with Browning under Center, UW is 1-2; 33 Win % in games decided by 3 points or less
- 9.27.14; v Stanford (16); 20-13; L
- 10.18.14; @ 0regon (9); 45-20; L
- 10.25.14; v ASU (14); 24-10; L
- 11.8.14; v UCLA (18); 44-30; L
- 11.15.14; @ UA (14); 27-26; L
- 9.4.15; @ BSU (23); 16-13; L
- 10.8.15; @ USC (17); 17-12; W
- 10.24.15; @ Stanford (10); 31-14; L
- 11.7.15; v Utah (12); 34-23; L
- 11.27.15; WSU (20); 45-10; W
- 9.30.16; v Stanford (7); 44-6; W
- 10.29.16; @ Utah (17); 31-24; W
- 11.12.16; v USC (20); 26-13; L
- 11.25.16; WSU (23); 45-17; W
- 12.2.16; Colorado (8); 41-10; W
- 12.31.16; Bama (1); 24-7; L
- 11.25.17; v WSU (13); 41-14; W
- 12.30.17; n Penn State (9); 35-28; L
- 9.1.18; n Auburn (9); 21-16; L
- 9.29.18; v BYU (20); 35-7; W
- 10.13.18; @ 0regon (17); 30-27; L
Notes: Win versus highest-ranked opponent= Stanford (7); loss versus lowest-ranked opponent= BSU (23); if it weren't for beating 3 ranked WSU teams, record would be 5-16; 23 Win %; with Browning under Center, UW is 8-8; 50 Win % versus ranked opponents
• Games Decided by 3 Points or Less: *** 2-3; 40 Win % ***
- 8.30.14; @ Hawai'i; 17-16; W
- 11.15.14; @ Arizona; 27-26; L
- 9.4.15; @ Boise St; 16-13; L
- 11.18.17; v Utah; 33-30; W
- 10.13.18; @ 0regon (17); 30-27; L
Notes: Of these games decided by 3 points or less, only win that could be considered "quality" is Utah; with Browning under Center, UW is 1-2; 33 Win % in games decided by 3 points or less
Comments
-
Did you do a multivariate analysis and adjust for confounding variables?
-
You forgot to quantify that, "it's hard."
The PAC-12 is TUFF. -
That’s disturbing
-
Chris Petersen is a good coach. He isn't a great coach.
How there is still so much argument about this is crazy. -
If we still have these problems with a new QB it will be damning. Peters biggest fault is his stubborness with his offense and his QB. If Eason or Haener or anyone else is still checking in to fade routes at the goal line, then fire Pete
-
Going Owen 5 the first year doesn't help.
-
6-5 in the last three years. Still not great but much better than 8-13. If that trend line can keep going up with a new QB we'll be fine.
-
Petersen is a great underdog school coach.Mosster47 said:Chris Petersen is a good coach. He isn't a great coach.
How there is still so much argument about this is crazy.
He's a good to great high-end school coach but consistently great remains to be seen.
We'll see in 3-4 years if he can shed any more of his underdog tendencies that hold him or the program back from running with the big dogs full time. -
The issue is is how hard, it is hard, how hard it is to get the guy that wins the 10 games a year you are supposed to win so he is even in position to lose the 2 or 3 games a year that become big games
Seven win Sark. 5 win Ty. 2 win Gilby
So we got the guy that can win the 10. But he is really concerning on the big game, close game, road game win o meter.
I'll say it again, finishing out the season is harder than it looks. Shaw, Leach, Cristobal, and Petersen are in the battle to the end to win the league
At this point that is what is left on the table
Bobby Bowden would lose one game a year forever. The one game he needed to win a championship. But as he said, he won a lot of little ones to make those games big
It's hard guys -
I'm hearing 2021 will be special.animate said:
Petersen is a great underdog school coach.Mosster47 said:Chris Petersen is a good coach. He isn't a great coach.
How there is still so much argument about this is crazy.
He's a good to great high-end school coach but consistently great remains to be seen.
We'll see in 3-4 years if he can shed any more of his underdog tendencies that hold him or the program back from running with the big dogs full time.
