we've just rejuvenated Oregon football... again
Comments
-
So we’re going to grow a new secondary from stem cells? That’s what the new science campus is for...oregonblitzkrieg said:
We beat #7 and lost because we shot ourselves in the foot with every fluky play benefiting the other team. We beat #7 again, this time it stuck. The cougs should be worried, but there's a lot to clean up this week.AZDuck said:
Our secondary is not good. It’s gonna be a problem unless we kill their QBoregonblitzkrieg said:
NoAZDuck said:
Yepdtd said:
Please, Ducks will lose at least one more, starting next week.DerekJohnson said:Chris Petersen and his staff mismanaged this game so poorly.
-
OBK Logic.
Pissing a game away at home to Stanford = win.
Winning because the other team missed a 37 yard walkoff FG = win. -
Sounds like you’re saying the same thing.dhdawg said:OBK Logic.
Pissing a game away at home to Stanford = win.
Winning because the other team missed a 37 yard walkoff FG = win. -
Not losing to shitty teams is not good enough.YellowSnow said:
The flip side to this coin Bazey is that Pete's teams don't tend to lose (i.e. Get upset by) to the shitty teams. This is a tough loss and sucks ass but it's not a programimg defining disaster. Oregon is roughly equal to us right now TBS wise and we're not at a point as a program still where we win this game every time. We've run the table once in the PAC in the past 40 years.PurpleBaze said:
It's not just Oregon.YellowSnow said:
I don't buy that for one second. You guys are acting like a bunch of candy asses. Oregon has talent on their roster and we played them in a tough road environment and lost in OT. So fucking be it. That's college football.DerekJohnson said:
you watch. They will point to this game as the turning pointYellowSnow said:Oh for crying out loud. This isn't 1994 at all.
Every game has had moments that point to coaching deficiency. Game time management leaves a lot to be desired.
At the beginning of the season I said we drop one to either Utah, UCLA, or Oregon. So far the script is working out as I expected.
Good game management would have resulted in a win today. Maybe beat ASU last year. Maybe not have the Cooper fumble in year 1.
I'm not going to crown his ass for the simple fact of not losing to shitty teams.
Anyway, he's the best we can do at this time. Either he changes some of his tendencies or well just have to wait to doog it up for the next coach. -
To make things fair, Stanford should give the game away to Washington and all records will be as they should be.dhdawg said:OBK Logic.
Pissing a game away at home to Stanford = win.
Winning because the other team missed a 37 yard walkoff FG = win. -
Nah, we should give the game to Stanford and let them keep their tiebreaker to spite the ducks.ToiletBowl1983 said:
To make things fair, Stanford should give the game away to Washington and all records will be as they should be.dhdawg said:OBK Logic.
Pissing a game away at home to Stanford = win.
Winning because the other team missed a 37 yard walkoff FG = win. -
We? weren't 7
-
How about Oregon is good and they beat UW? And Pete and Hamden orchestrated a masterful game-winning drive? And a RS frosh kicker missed a long extra point to win game? Stalin...GET YOUR HEAD OUT YOUR ASS
-
Fuck off!puppylove_sugarsteel said:How about Oregon is good and they beat UW? And Pete and Hamden orchestrated a masterful game-winning drive? And a RS frosh kicker missed a long extra point to win game? Stalin...GET YOUR HEAD OUT YOUR ASS
-
^
This. Both teams turned out to be good and evenly matched. -
Pete 4 and a half years in got beat by a coach 6 games in. Let that sink in.puppylove_sugarsteel said:How about Oregon is good and they beat UW? And Pete and Hamden orchestrated a masterful game-winning drive? And a RS frosh kicker missed a long extra point to win game? Stalin...GET YOUR HEAD OUT YOUR ASS
-
Cristobal isn't Sark.whuggy said:
Pete 4 and a half years in got beat by a coach 6 games in. Let that sink in.puppylove_sugarsteel said:How about Oregon is good and they beat UW? And Pete and Hamden orchestrated a masterful game-winning drive? And a RS frosh kicker missed a long extra point to win game? Stalin...GET YOUR HEAD OUT YOUR ASS
-
If Oregon didnt self destruct vs Stanford that's a top 10 matchup would you feel the same? If a certain WR's foot was an inch different UW wins. What's the matter with u fucks? Hey Cale, you'll never play at Oregon
-
Take this shit back to doogman, doog.puppylove_sugarsteel said:If Oregon didnt self destruct vs Stanford that's a top 10 matchup would you feel the same? If a certain WR's foot was an inch different UW wins. What's the matter with u fucks? Hey Cale, you'll never play at Oregon
-
There is no magic formula about year 5. We won the PAC 12 in year three and went to the playoffs.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:He's a good coach. He's not Satan, Meyer, or even Franklin or Sweeney. It's year 5.
We aren't where we want to be, but we're a good program with a chance to get better the next few years. -
I have to say I agree with Pumpy in this thread.puppylove_sugarsteel said:If Oregon didnt self destruct vs Stanford that's a top 10 matchup would you feel the same? If a certain WR's foot was an inch different UW wins. What's the matter with u fucks? Hey Cale, you'll never play at Oregon
-
Need better players, depth, better coaching, way better qb development, way better special teams.RoadDawg55 said:
There is no magic formula about year 5. We won the PAC 12 in year three and went to the playoffs.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:He's a good coach. He's not Satan, Meyer, or even Franklin or Sweeney. It's year 5.
We aren't where we want to be, but we're a good program with a chance to get better the next few years.
Try hard 3 star white boys are okay but you can't heavily rely on them -
Disagree.oregonblitzkrieg said:^
Both teams turned out to be good -
Don't worry, we only gave up one blown coverage by our best CB long touchdown pass today.AZDuck said:
So we’re going to grow a new secondary from stem cells? That’s what the new science campus is for...oregonblitzkrieg said:
We beat #7 and lost because we shot ourselves in the foot with every fluky play benefiting the other team. We beat #7 again, this time it stuck. The cougs should be worried, but there's a lot to clean up this week.AZDuck said:
Our secondary is not good. It’s gonna be a problem unless we kill their QBoregonblitzkrieg said:
NoAZDuck said:
Yepdtd said:
Please, Ducks will lose at least one more, starting next week.DerekJohnson said:Chris Petersen and his staff mismanaged this game so poorly.
-
This game only showed that Pete sucks. ASU barely beat us last year too...
-
*Dominated us for 3 quartershaie said:This game only showed that Pete sucks. ASU barely beat us last year too...
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
U couldnt be more fucktarded DerekDerekJohnson said:Chris Petersen and his staff mismanaged this game so poorly.
-
Stalin, if Peyton's 1st kick, which went through, was his 2nd you wouldnt have even started this thread.
-
Haie...gateshaie said:This game only showed that Pete sucks. ASU barely beat us last year too...
-
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, FUCK OFF AND DIE!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stalin, if Peyton's 1st kick, which went through, was his 2nd you wouldnt have even started this thread.
-
Gates to u as well numbnuts. Who the fuck are u chumps? It's why dawgman still floats. Meaning rational dawgfans have a homePurpleBaze said:
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, FUCK OFF AND DIE!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stalin, if Peyton's 1st kick, which went through, was his 2nd you wouldnt have even started this thread.
-
It's not about the last kick, dumbass.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Gates to u as well numbnuts. Who the fuck are u chumps?PurpleBaze said:
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, FUCK OFF AND DIE!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stalin, if Peyton's 1st kick, which went through, was his 2nd you wouldnt have even started this thread.
It's the whole game and it's about Petersen's shit game management, which hasn't improved much since 2014.
Go back to doogman and provide more material for Fetters. -
Dont be so suredtd said:
Please, Ducks will lose at least one more, starting next week.DerekJohnson said:Chris Petersen and his staff mismanaged this game so poorly.
-
Better than every one. Just see his winning %. But what do stats matter to u dipshitsFire_Marshall_Bill said:He's a good coach. He's not Satan, Meyer, or even Franklin or Sweeney. It's year 5.
-
Stats are for losers. Sure, beat up on weak-dick teams and shit the bed when it matters.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Better than every one. Just see his winning %. But what do stats matter to u dipshitsFire_Marshall_Bill said:He's a good coach. He's not Satan, Meyer, or even Franklin or Sweeney. It's year 5.
