Doogman thread of the year

MikeDamone · June 2013

Accurate prediction of Oregon penalties followed by classic grinolds.

mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1361

HillsboroDuck · June 2013

which thread, that just goes to the rivalry bored?

MikeDamone · June 2013

Whoops

Try this one

mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1361&t=11301625

AZDuck · June 2013

MikeDamone said:
Accurate prediction of Oregon penalties followed by classic grinolds.

mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1361

"Your access to this site's forums is revoked"

Cut and paste, motherfucker!

MikeDamone · June 2013

AZDuck said:

MikeDamone said:
Accurate prediction of Oregon penalties followed by classic grinolds.

mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1361
"Your access to this site's forums is revoked"

Cut and paste, motherfucker!

Hey dumb fuck. It's on free board. Log your dumb banned ass out and you can read it.

HillsboroDuck · June 2013

MikeDamone said:
Whoops

Try this one

mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1361&t=11301625

Good call. That thread delivers.

BAMAdawg10 · June 2013

Love seeing Kim make stuff up about DNC and failing to address it when DNC calls him out on it. Great hypocrisy, as always.

bananasnblondes · June 2013

Best part:

"Kim owns a fortune 500 company. He knows all about upper management. Last I checked, this was a sports forum, which is focused on football.

A poster comes on here and says the President at UW was a disaster for the football program? Talk about the wrong place..."

His defenders are just as delusional as him

TierbsHsotBoobs · June 2013

Mark Emmert has been one of Oregon football's best friends over the past decade. Check the facts.

MikeDamone · June 2013

I like this exchange in the thread:

DNC:"He (Emmert) screwed the football program, and he's a disaster with the NCAA."

Kim:"How did he screw the football program?"

DNC:"Allowed Willingham to be here for 4 years."

Kim: "You said he was a disaster.........explain why he was a disaster"

DNC:"Emmert took over UW in the summer of 2004. In December, 2004 UW hired Ty. Emmert was very involved in the process of hiring the head coach to man the "front porch". Ty was a disaster of a hire. Allowing Ty to have a fourth year was another wonderful decision. UW football was 17-54 during the football president's tenure. I don't blame him for Gilby's 1-10 his first year, but he's responsible for a lion's share of the 16-44 thereafter. Disaster."

Kim;"How was he very involved? Was he really that involved or did he let the AD do his job and make the call?"

DNC:"Here's a Condotta article that says Emmert "helped spearhead the hiring of Willingham in 2005".

Kim:"You said he was a disaster. Just asking you how he was a disaster. Sorry you didn't like the question"

That's the BEST!

BertWinthrop · June 2013

Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.

MikeDamone · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.

Judging from your posts so far, comedy isn't really your thing. So you "not getting it" doesn't surprise me.

Sincerely - "Mick Diamond"

RoadDawg55 · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.

That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

BertWinthrop · June 2013

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.

TierbsHsotBoobs · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.

Sadly, Dawgman is the Internet voice for the majority of the Husky fanbase. The ridiculous little brother syndrome that is on full display over there is just a reflection of the attitude of the fanbase as a whole, which is why another 0-12 is so necessary.

MikeDamone · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.

I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.

My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.

If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.

BertWinthrop · June 2013

MikeDamone said:

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.

My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.

If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.

I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.

TierbsHsotBoobs · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:

MikeDamone said:

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.

My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.

If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.
I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.

If you ever make an interesting post, that will be interesting. If you continue to suck the life out of this message bored, that will be interesting too.

BertWinthrop · June 2013

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BertWinthrop said:

MikeDamone said:

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.

My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.

If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.
I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.
If you ever make an interesting post, that will be interesting. If you continue to suck the life out of this message bored, that will be interesting too.

Well that makes it easy, either way you'll be interested. It's like a reverse Catch-22 for you.

BAMAdawg10 · June 2013

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.

Look, you can call Mick Diamond all the names you want. Just don't make stuff up, or you won't last long. We put up with a lot of that stuff last year, but it's just not going to fly this year.

BertWinthrop · June 2013

BAMAdawg10 said:

BertWinthrop said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BertWinthrop said:
Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.

Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.

The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.

Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.
Look, you can call Mick Diamond all the names you want. Just don't make stuff up, or you won't last long. We put up with a lot of that stuff last year, but it's just not going to fly this year.

I've got ocean-front property in Great Falls, MT...no seriously.

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Doogman thread of the year

Comments