Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Doogman thread of the year
Comments
-
Judging from your posts so far, comedy isn't really your thing. So you "not getting it" doesn't surprise me.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Sincerely - "Mick Diamond"
-
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
-
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't. -
Sadly, Dawgman is the Internet voice for the majority of the Husky fanbase. The ridiculous little brother syndrome that is on full display over there is just a reflection of the attitude of the fanbase as a whole, which is why another 0-12 is so necessary.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
-
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.
If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.
-
I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.MikeDamone said:
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.
If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting. -
If you ever make an interesting post, that will be interesting. If you continue to suck the life out of this message bored, that will be interesting too.BertWinthrop said:
I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.MikeDamone said:
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.
If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting. -
Well that makes it easy, either way you'll be interested. It's like a reverse Catch-22 for you.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you ever make an interesting post, that will be interesting. If you continue to suck the life out of this message bored, that will be interesting too.BertWinthrop said:
I'm all about keeping it interesting MD, so for your sake, I'll be sure to continue doing it incorrectly.MikeDamone said:
I always enjoyed RoaDawg55's posts. Always well thougt out and classy.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
My post? Sarcastic yes, bitter no.
If your going to paraphrase what I'm saying then fine, but if your going to do it incorrectly, then it will be interesting.
-
Look, you can call Mick Diamond all the names you want. Just don't make stuff up, or you won't last long. We put up with a lot of that stuff last year, but it's just not going to fly this year.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't. -
I've got ocean-front property in Great Falls, MT...no seriously.BAMAdawg10 said:
Look, you can call Mick Diamond all the names you want. Just don't make stuff up, or you won't last long. We put up with a lot of that stuff last year, but it's just not going to fly this year.BertWinthrop said:
Thanks for the well thought out reply, RoadDawg55. Evidently MD isn't capable of any response that doesn't contain bitter sarcasm and some odd interest in the fact that he doesn't find my posts humorous.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a fair point, but it is too hard to ignore. Dawgman is a train wreck, and has been for quite some time. Unfortunately, it is also the biggest UW sports online community. When the face of that site predicts huge penalties and says it is going to get ugly in Eugene for 2 1/2 years, and then they get practically nothing, it's big news and deserves to be mocked.BertWinthrop said:Is this site's sole purpose to bash another site (Dawgman)? It seems like if Dawgman was so ridiculous and insignificant, that it would be best just to be ignored.
Kim hinted at drugs, gangs, prostitution, multiple sports in trouble, etc. He REALLY ran with this thing and reported everything he heard when 90% of it was people trolling him and getting a kick out of him actually posting it on his board.
The sad thing is, Kim thinks he is winning as long as people are talking about him and his business. He seems to have some real issues that deep down, are probably not that funny. He does crave the attention, whether it be negative or positive. So, I get what you are saying, and it would probably be best to ignore dawgman, but I just can't.
