yo blitz

Gladstone said:

obk backed down to J

/thread

More like I'm holding the line of scrimmage against an angry, doogy, coogy onslaught. I shined the light on some cold hard truths. I told you Oregon is becoming a calculating, tuff, SEC style team. Oregon is the traditional power in the Northwest. It begins with that. Taking that back. Betting terms get negotiated. J's got the mob on his side. I'm the Quook Capital.

You want to get into it with OBK, terms get negotiated. No Herbert, no bets. That's the way I'm rolling this season. Shitmeister plays, I don't bet on Oregon. Max bets for games more than one week out are 1 month avatar changes. If I like what I see in Berkeley, and J is still confident about his dwags after UCLA, then we can play the title game for the 1 year avatar change.

J's the dog in this battle. I won the last title game.

^

TL;DR

It's getting salty in here. This is a big boy match, OBK vs J, everyone else can just move along and get out the way, including you Squanto, Tonto, Pocahontas whoever. A pussy is someone who doesn't want to see the best matchup possible and bet on that. I made it clear. No one's strong arming me into terms. TUFF team. TUFF fans. New philosophy. New attitude. Oregon is on its way BACK. Eat shit if you don't like it.

I want to see a match up between a GOOD Oregon and a GOOD Washington. That's what I want to bet on, or nothing. Big stage or nothing at all. This is now a GAME WEEK bet. If I think we've got a good hand and are a GOOD Oregon team (Cal win, Herbert healthy), I'll take the bet if J is still confident in his dwags and wants to follow through on it.

Fair terms. Anyone who doesn't agree is a pussy. Motherfucking den of lions in here.

Doogles said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

I already said Herbert has to play.

Methed up quook mode had the ducks raping the dwags.

Rationale quook mode says we win by 1 to 2 touchdowns. That's predicated on a healthy QB not named Shitmeister and a win over Cal.

This is where you lose all credibility. You've seen enough to think 1-2 TDs over UW but first you need to see what happens at Cal?

Everyone has access to the same info. You're scared of Cal?

Exactly.

It’s one thing to say you want to make sure Herbert is healthy. Fine. We all want our superstars healthy to make sure it’s a legit game.

But to say you first want to see how the Cal game goes, to make sure your team is good, is just being a puss.

You want me to make a 'big money' bet on a sketchy risk/reward scenario. Who is Peterson? We already know. Who is Cristobal? That's still being determined. Will I bet on him right now? Sure, but I'm not betting the pot on it. If you're that impatient to make a bet about it, accept the 1 month avatar change terms and be done with it. That's the limit of my faith in Cristobal at this point in time.

If on the other hand you're serious about wanting to bet on two contenders with higher stakes on the line, I want to verify that my team is a contender this year. The Stanford game has me leaning in that direction. I want to see what happens at Cal before I make that determination.

If we lose to Cal I think we could lose to UW too and the season goes on a downward spiral. If we lose Herbert in that game TSIO no question. Why would I bet 'big money' on UO if that's the outcome I'm expecting? I take UW in that scenario. I'm a winner first, a quook second. My expectations for the team this year will be set in stone next week. You get two weeks to decide how you think your team stacks up against Oregon after the BYU and UCLA games.

This is CAL week for us, not UW week. Beat Cal, nothing else matters. Boobs has Cal at #1. If we beat Cal it shows Cristobal might just be a serious coach (jury is still out on that). That's a GOOD Oregon team, vetted and verified. A team I would up the ante for. In that scenario Oregon goes on the warpath, beats UW by 1-2 TDs and becomes one of the primary contenders in the PAC 12. Maybe even running the rest of the table. I've said this all along.

Fucking avatar talk. What a bunch of cunts.

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

RedRocket said:

OBK is too big of an Atomic Blonde fan boi to risk losing his avatar. Step back the keyboard OBK it's just a fucking avatar. Pretty harmless as far as bets go you giant pussy.

He changed it to being banned for a year. Still a huge pussy, though.

1 year avatar change was your original bet. Hth. Lets make that bet but each of us gets an opt out clause. I don't like what I see at Cal, Herbert gets injured, etc. and I decide I don't think Oregon is a contender this year after all, and I back out, you get to change the avatar for a month. Think of it as punishment for losing to Cal. You opt to back out after BYU or UCLA, same deal, I get to change your avatar for a month. If neither of us backs down after those games have been played, then it's on. 1 year avatar change.

You suggested the ban idea. Now it's off the table? What a cunt. Deal's off bitch.

Not for a year. If you want to work that into this bet, switch out the 1 month penalty for backing out to 1 month in the gulag.

J & OBK are making me look good.