My thoughts on Budda Baker
Comments
-
No academis?Mad_Son said:He was never going to qualify - real grade issues. The kid is an idiot and was really burning some bridges. The coaches really cooled on him and started backing off. He has already done most of his development and has less potential than the guys Washington is still in on. WDWHA.
-
Kim has assembled the faggots on staff and the dm.c spin machine is high gear as we speak.
-
It's between UW and UCLA. HI Kim!!!!!
-
Great Ramblings MAAAAAAdson!!!!!!!
-
Been hitting F5 on Doogman for a while... crickets from the goon squad.
You'd think they would be ready to go with some analysis or information when the biggest recruit in the state commits.
What are those assholes paying their $9.95 for? At least I have an excuse.
-
I don't care if we get players from the state. I don't care if they come from Jupiter as long as the coaches get who they want.
-
How can such a loser or mediocre kid become the top rated recruit in the State of Washington? The over-the-top praise for Baker's talent and game would seem to contradict everything you just said. Hell, I've read stuff like 'You don't want to leave your seat while Baker's on the field because you're likely to miss something grand". Are the recruiting experts such as Scout and Rivals so fucktarded?Mad_Son said:He was never going to qualify - real grade issues. The kid is an idiot and was really burning some bridges. The coaches really cooled on him and started backing off. He has already done most of his development and has less potential than the guys Washington is still in on. WDWHA.
Could this be another example of why the collegiate football experience as it plays out for hundreds of future NFL draftees and free agents every year belies the value of star-ratings attached to thousands of prep recruits, many even before they've finished their high school eligibility. And conversely does it add credence if not gospel to the necessity for the better coaching staffs to perform their own scouting evaluations of those hard-to -find, under-the-radar OKG's that form the core of all good programs?
-
He would have had to redshirt and he MIGHT have seen playing time when he was a junior but probably not. That position is so deep there just wasn't enough room for him.
-
Seriously? Mods?Tailgater said:
How can such a loser or mediocre kid become the top rated recruit in the State of Washington? The over-the-top praise for Baker's talent and game would seem to contradict everything you just said. Hell, I've read stuff like 'You don't want to leave your seat while Baker's on the field because you're likely to miss something grand". Are the recruiting experts such as Scout and Rivals so fucktarded?Mad_Son said:He was never going to qualify - real grade issues. The kid is an idiot and was really burning some bridges. The coaches really cooled on him and started backing off. He has already done most of his development and has less potential than the guys Washington is still in on. WDWHA.
Could this be another example of why the collegiate football experience as it plays out for hundreds of future NFL draftees and free agents every year belies the value of star-ratings attached to thousands of prep recruits, many even before they've finished their high school eligibility. And conversely does it add credence if not gospel to the necessity for the better coaching staffs to perform their own scouting evaluations of those hard-to -find, under-the-radar OKG's that form the core of all good programs? -
I'm hearing he didn't like coffee ...
