Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Petersen echoed pup's concerns...
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
To fucking HELP Browning out...and Hamden is subtly included in that sentiment. I told you fucks losing Smith as a playcaller wouldnt be seamless with Hamhock. Guy cant call a game. Not in Johnny's league as a playcaller.
Ty Jones cant find the football. His timing is horrible, his inability to high-point the ball is atrocious, and his hands are like 50lb dumbbells (J, those are found in a weightroom, u should visit one b4 u die, the chicks are hot)...Get him outta there outside the red zone. I want Fuller, Pounds and Bynum in there between the 20's. And Hamden you ignorant cunt, learn when to call a fucking screen.
Ty Jones cant find the football. His timing is horrible, his inability to high-point the ball is atrocious, and his hands are like 50lb dumbbells (J, those are found in a weightroom, u should visit one b4 u die, the chicks are hot)...Get him outta there outside the red zone. I want Fuller, Pounds and Bynum in there between the 20's. And Hamden you ignorant cunt, learn when to call a fucking screen.
Comments
-
Yryk
-
The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to pod.
-
I just want to know pumpys hair care secrets
You dont get flowing blonde locks by accident. -
It's like you forgot who is QB for UW.
-
UW_Doog_Bot said:
The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to be hired as OC.
-
-
-
I'd like to hear a halftime motivational speach from pumpy.whuggy said:UW_Doog_Bot said:The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to be hired as OC.
-
PurpleBaze said:
I'd like to hear a halftime motivational speach from pumpy.whuggy said:UW_Doog_Bot said:The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to be hired as OC.
-
Half-tim?PurpleBaze said:
I'd like to hear a halftime motivational speach from pumpy.whuggy said:UW_Doog_Bot said:The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to be hired as OC.
-
I can just hear him talking about how the team needs to go out there and dominate, like pup used to dominate the playground in elementary school.
-
Which rosters in the PAC 12 wouldn't you take over UW?
You're a paranoid guy Pup. -
Paranoid is the least of his problems.RoadDawg55 said:Which rosters in the PAC 12 wouldn't you take over UW?
You're a paranoid guy Pup. -
Careful...PurpleBaze said:
Paranoid is the least of his problems.RoadDawg55 said:Which rosters in the PAC 12 wouldn't you take over UW?
You're a paranoid guy Pup. -
That was almost a WTF for thinking Bynum is better than Cook.
-
Jones can’t catch, huh?
-
Uhh, neither has done anything of note. They are the same until proven otherwise.NorwegianHusky said:That was almost a WTF for thinking Bynum is better than Cook.
-
Cook was better in high school. He's also seen the field in college. For now, my opinion is that Cook is better. But if you want to wait 10 years to call it, that's up you Captain Hindsight. Way to put your nuts on the table.RoadDawg55 said:
Uhh, neither has done anything of note. They are the same until proven otherwise.NorwegianHusky said:That was almost a WTF for thinking Bynum is better than Cook.
-
-
It could go a lot of different directions but I guarantee ring sting would be in it.PurpleBaze said:
I'd like to hear a halftime motivational speach from pumpy.whuggy said:UW_Doog_Bot said:The masses are clamoring for @puppylove_sugarsteel to be hired as OC.
-
I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.NorwegianHusky said:
Cook was better in high school. He's also seen the field in college. For now, my opinion is that Cook is better. But if you want to wait 10 years to call it, that's up you Captain Hindsight. Way to put your nuts on the table.RoadDawg55 said:
Uhh, neither has done anything of note. They are the same until proven otherwise.NorwegianHusky said:That was almost a WTF for thinking Bynum is better than Cook.
-
This.NorwegianHusky said:Cook was better in high school. He's also seen the field in college. For now, my opinion is that Cook is better. But if you want to wait 10 years to call it, that's up you Captain Hindsight. Way to put your nuts on the table.
Coaches must evaluate players' potential based on their performances in high school, summer camps, and college practices. It's obvious and pointless to observe that players haven't accomplished anything on the field until they have. In the meanwhile, coaches and fans can and should evaluate young players' potential relative to one another. -
Where you getting that Cook was better in HS? I loved Bynum's tape, Cooks senior tape was meh. Bynum was also considerably more highly ranked than Cook. Bynum's offer sheet was also far longer and more impressive, and they committed around the same time so it wasn't like one guy just shut it down while the other solicited more offers.NorwegianHusky said:
Cook was better in high school. He's also seen the field in college. For now, my opinion is that Cook is better. But if you want to wait 10 years to call it, that's up you Captain Hindsight. Way to put your nuts on the table.RoadDawg55 said:
Uhh, neither has done anything of note. They are the same until proven otherwise.NorwegianHusky said:That was almost a WTF for thinking Bynum is better than Cook.
-
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
-
Ross only had like a half year at WR and one year out with chinjury in Pete's system before he broke out though. I'm not sure banking on third year breakouts is always going to play out.Squirt said:
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
TMJF is breaking out in year two. Baccellia still sucks in year three.
I agree on the last line that I'd wait until next year to write them off. I'm not sure there's really a "third year breakout" trend though, it's basically Pettis and Fuller, and Pettis looked good in year one and bad in year two. Fuller's the only one who was truly anonymous before year three and then emerged at that point. -
Sure sure, bring up Ty Jones excelling this year. Sure sure, the careers of Brayden Dickey, Isaiah Renfro-Woods, Andre Baccellia, Quinten Pounds, and Jordan Chin are also data points that don't fit my narrative. I don't appreciate your fair minded critiques of my assertions.HillsboroDuck said:
Ross only had like a half year at WR and one year out with chinjury in Pete's system before he broke out though. I'm not sure banking on third year breakouts is always going to play out.Squirt said:
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
TMJF is breaking out in year two. Baccellia still sucks in year three.
I agree on the last line that I'd wait until next year to write them off. I'm not sure there's really a "third year breakout" trend though, it's basically Pettis and Fuller, and Pettis looked good in year one and bad in year two. Fuller's the only one who was truly anonymous before year three and then emerged at that point. -
Im as shocked as anyone, but Baccalia isnt bad.HillsboroDuck said:
Ross only had like a half year at WR and one year out with chinjury in Pete's system before he broke out though. I'm not sure banking on third year breakouts is always going to play out.Squirt said:
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
TMJF is breaking out in year two. Baccellia still sucks in year three.
I agree on the last line that I'd wait until next year to write them off. I'm not sure there's really a "third year breakout" trend though, it's basically Pettis and Fuller, and Pettis looked good in year one and bad in year two. Fuller's the only one who was truly anonymous before year three and then emerged at that point. -
Could be true.RoadDawg55 said:
Im as shocked as anyone, but Baccalia isnt bad.HillsboroDuck said:
Ross only had like a half year at WR and one year out with chinjury in Pete's system before he broke out though. I'm not sure banking on third year breakouts is always going to play out.Squirt said:
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
TMJF is breaking out in year two. Baccellia still sucks in year three.
I agree on the last line that I'd wait until next year to write them off. I'm not sure there's really a "third year breakout" trend though, it's basically Pettis and Fuller, and Pettis looked good in year one and bad in year two. Fuller's the only one who was truly anonymous before year three and then emerged at that point.
I'll never forgive him for the pick at Auburn. -
I'm not writing them off. They are two non factors this year and that's not changing.Squirt said:
We have enough evidence to conclude that WRs breakout in their third year in Pete's system (true for Ross, Pettis, and Fuller).RoadDawg55 said:I don't give a shit which mediocre WR is better.
Dismissing Cook and Bynum as mediocre seems premature.
