its been said a hundred times, but it's accurate so let's make it 101
Comments
-
Muschamp might be a lunatic, but he is also a guy who thrives on the underdog attitude, just like Petersen.NEPTUNE said:
-
Nah, where Peterman is going with UW takes more tim.
Getting his recruiting chops down with higher end croots, competing against bigger and deeper coffee cups, dealing with immigration-savvy recruiters and learning to give reacharounds with the likes of FSP and Heir.
Easier at Boise. Harder at the power 5 level. -
OR, he might just be a fucking lunatic...NorwegianHusky said:
Muschamp might be a lunatic, but he is also a guy who thrives on the underdog attitude, just like Petersen.NEPTUNE said: -
Such rationale thinking will only draw scorn in this place. Get out while you can!animate said:Nah, where Peterman is going with UW takes more tim.
Getting his recruiting chops down with higher end croots, competing against bigger and deeper coffee cups, dealing with immigration-savvy recruiters and learning to give reacharounds with the likes of FSP and Heir.
Easier at Boise. Harder at the power 5 level. -
Might as well not even play the games
-
I try to keep my rational thoughts to myself around HH. But once in awhile i lose control and post rational shit on the boreds ... usually its a waste of tim.TurdBuffer said:
Such rationale thinking will only draw scorn in this place. Get out while you can!animate said:Nah, where Peterman is going with UW takes more tim.
Getting his recruiting chops down with higher end croots, competing against bigger and deeper coffee cups, dealing with immigration-savvy recruiters and learning to give reacharounds with the likes of FSP and Heir.
Easier at Boise. Harder at the power 5 level. -
He is complete fucking moron.NorwegianHusky said:
Muschamp might be a lunatic, but he is also a guy who thrives on the underdog attitude, just like Petersen.NEPTUNE said: -
-
That, and the up-downpunishment.gif sum up Sark in a nutshell.Baseman said:
I already assumed he ate boogers. -
1. Didn't know Petersen was the play caller. Oh that's right he's not.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Great cherry picking as always.HillsboroDuck said:This is a bad thread. If Pete were playing not to lose we? don't run the speed option nor the QB draw crap. Not to lose means you call the obvious and don't take chances. He isn't playing not to lose. He is taking chances, just the wrong ones.
Our corners were 10 yards off the LOS and our AA safety was 20.
Our down the field passing attack was unstoppable, but we can't quit the dink and dunk.
Those designed QB runs arent out of the ordinary. Browning looks like Vince Young against Oregon. Any kind of trick play was nowhere to be seen.
2. Our secondary is about not giving up touch downs. We'll give you the short shit and field goals but they are not going to let you beat them deep. I too would like to see more press man coverage and force more three and outs like Bama does but it's hard to argue with UW's defensive success.
3. Any play call that involves Browning trying to do anything remotely athletic is fucking stupid. No argument here. But what does that have to do with Petersen "playing not to lose".
4. How many deep balls did UW throw against Auburn? Probably more than they did in any game all last season. Doesn't sound like "playing not to lose" to me.
