its been said a hundred times, but it's accurate so let's make it 101
Comments
-
The offense has been talked about but the defense having the 2 future NFL corners in soft coverage, playing Jojo Mcintosh and Rapp 25 yards off the LOS was almost as stupid as calling a speed option for browning.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Petersen coached to win at Boise.
At Washington he is coaching not to lose.
playing scared, especially at the start of big games... -
Dumb thread to begin with, murdered by cliches.
-
The only worse thing than Browning is you mopey ass pussies.
You still have a good team quit bitching. Have you seen SC and the rest of the pac? -
Sports is one giant clicheTurdBuffer said:Dumb thread to begin with, murdered by cliches.
-
The speed option at the goal line might be the worst play call I've ever seen.
Hamadan. Hot seat. Now.
Also, further proof it's Pete's offense. -
This is a bad thread. If Pete were playing not to lose we? don't run the speed option nor the QB draw crap. Not to lose means you call the obvious and don't take chances. He isn't playing not to lose. He is taking chances, just the wrong ones.
-
Great cherry picking as always.HillsboroDuck said:This is a bad thread. If Pete were playing not to lose we? don't run the speed option nor the QB draw crap. Not to lose means you call the obvious and don't take chances. He isn't playing not to lose. He is taking chances, just the wrong ones.
Our corners were 10 yards off the LOS and our AA safety was 20.
Our down the field passing attack was unstoppable, but we can't quit the dink and dunk.
Those designed QB runs arent out of the ordinary. Browning looks like Vince Young against Oregon. Any kind of trick play was nowhere to be seen. -
TouchePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sports is one giant clicheTurdBuffer said:Dumb thread to begin with, murdered by cliches.
-
You want to argue the defense played not to lose I'll listen. The offense did not play not to lose. Nobody walks away from playing not to lose and says "we got too cute". We ran a jet sweep, QB draw with a kid who can't run fluidly enough to pass a DUI test and speed option with the same drunken QB. All inside the ten yard line. That is nothing like playing not to lose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Great cherry picking as always.HillsboroDuck said:This is a bad thread. If Pete were playing not to lose we? don't run the speed option nor the QB draw crap. Not to lose means you call the obvious and don't take chances. He isn't playing not to lose. He is taking chances, just the wrong ones.
Our corners were 10 yards off the LOS and our AA safety was 20.
Our down the field passing attack was unstoppable, but we can't quit the dink and dunk.
Those designed QB runs arent out of the ordinary. Browning looks like Vince Young against Oregon. Any kind of trick play was nowhere to be seen.
Playing not to lose would have punted that last offensive drive too.
We may have done better had the offense played not to lose. -
And yet the dink and dunk is what several poasters thought UW needed more of.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Great cherry picking as always.HillsboroDuck said:This is a bad thread. If Pete were playing not to lose we? don't run the speed option nor the QB draw crap. Not to lose means you call the obvious and don't take chances. He isn't playing not to lose. He is taking chances, just the wrong ones.
Our corners were 10 yards off the LOS and our AA safety was 20.
Our down the field passing attack was unstoppable, but we can't quit the dink and dunk.
Those designed QB runs arent out of the ordinary. Browning looks like Vince Young against Oregon. Any kind of trick play was nowhere to be seen.
Proof this thread had AIDS before I shat upon it.
