Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sarah Palin Excluded from John McCain’s Funeral
Comments
-
Jesus man don’t debase yourself like this, it’s the internetDuckHHunterisafag said:
You're a stupid cunt that can't hold a candle to Bob. You're a nobody and I'll enjoy participating in embarrassing your poor dumb ass.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way. -
True that was Race that posted the chart.. My bad for that. You did comment about it and argued that point.SFGbob said:
I didn't post a chart dumbass. Look I don't doubt that someone with your People Magazine level of political knowledge and sophistication was more swayed by what Palin said in an interview but right around the end of the second week of September you had the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and a nearly total meltdown of the financial markets. McCain's response to the crisis was disastrous but people who aren't very bright and who are susceptible to the party line group think believe Palin is what cost McCain the election. Btw, that's a line that the losers who were running McCain's campaign were more than happy to push in order deflect from the shitty job they did in running his campaign. It's why you, and plenty of your other fellow dumbfucks really believe Palin said she could see Russia from her house.2001400ex said:
No. McCain chose Palin. She knocked it out of the park at the convention. They were ahead. Just as your chart says. Then come the interviews...... And the rest is history. You have the charts to prove it.SFGbob said:
Yeah, that's probably the line I'd go with if I had just put my head up my ass.2001400ex said:
You are trying too hard.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
Dude, you can't even get your fucking facts straight and honestly recount something I said in a post that's staring your right in your stupid face. Do you really think anyone should rely on your worthless recollection of political events that occurred 10 years ago?
That being said. I know exactly what Palin said. And it was fucktarded. She fucked up a bunch of interviews. And McCain did fuck up the response to the financial crisis with his "I'm a leader and going to suspend my campaign" shit. There's a thousand reasons he lost and Palin was a part of that.
Look. I would fuck her as hard as you would. Mine would be a hate fucking while you probably want to lick her vagina while you blow your wad at the thought. So it's understandable why you can't accept she was part is the reason they lost. -
Sweet Geezus there is an epidemic of strawman ass fucking on this board. I didn't disregard any of her comments after the Convention. The Obama Campaign knew they had a problem with Palin and with the help of the press they trashed her. But none of this was the reason why McCain lost the election.ThomasFremont said:
Picking Palin was the biggest mistake of his campaign. You give her credit for the convention poll bump, and then disregard the shit show she was once she didn’t have a script in front of her while the cameras were rolling. It’s revisionist history to ignore the way she dominated the news cycle in a nagative way down the stretch. Nobody cared about the fucking meeting in the WH. You sick at this.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
It's pure revisionist history to say Palin cost McCain the election. McClain flailing around during the financial meltdown, suspending his campaign, looking like a complete boob during the meeting on the economy at the White House is what really cost McCain.
No one cared about the financial meltdown that was going on? -
Goal posts are moving again. So Palin has gone from the reason McCain lost the election to one of thousand reasons McCain lost the campaign.2001400ex said:
True that was Race that posted the chart.. My bad for that. You did comment about it and argued that point.SFGbob said:
I didn't post a chart dumbass. Look I don't doubt that someone with your People Magazine level of political knowledge and sophistication was more swayed by what Palin said in an interview but right around the end of the second week of September you had the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and a nearly total meltdown of the financial markets. McCain's response to the crisis was disastrous but people who aren't very bright and who are susceptible to the party line group think believe Palin is what cost McCain the election. Btw, that's a line that the losers who were running McCain's campaign were more than happy to push in order deflect from the shitty job they did in running his campaign. It's why you, and plenty of your other fellow dumbfucks really believe Palin said she could see Russia from her house.2001400ex said:
No. McCain chose Palin. She knocked it out of the park at the convention. They were ahead. Just as your chart says. Then come the interviews...... And the rest is history. You have the charts to prove it.SFGbob said:
Yeah, that's probably the line I'd go with if I had just put my head up my ass.2001400ex said:
You are trying too hard.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
Dude, you can't even get your fucking facts straight and honestly recount something I said in a post that's staring your right in your stupid face. Do you really think anyone should rely on your worthless recollection of political events that occurred 10 years ago?
That being said. I know exactly what Palin said. And it was fucktarded. She fucked up a bunch of interviews. And McCain did fuck up the response to the financial crisis with his "I'm a leader and going to suspend my campaign" shit. There's a thousand reasons he lost and Palin was a part of that.
Look. I would fuck her as hard as you would. Mine would be a hate fucking while you probably want to lick her vagina while you blow your wad at the thought. So it's understandable why you can't accept she was part is the reason they lost.
I accept your surrender. -
When did I say Palin was the sole reason? I said Palin has some shitty interviews and after that, their poll numbers declined. Fuck you are stupid.SFGbob said:
Goal posts are moving again. So Palin has gone from the reason McCain lost the election to one of thousand reasons McCain lost the campaign.2001400ex said:
True that was Race that posted the chart.. My bad for that. You did comment about it and argued that point.SFGbob said:
I didn't post a chart dumbass. Look I don't doubt that someone with your People Magazine level of political knowledge and sophistication was more swayed by what Palin said in an interview but right around the end of the second week of September you had the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and a nearly total meltdown of the financial markets. McCain's response to the crisis was disastrous but people who aren't very bright and who are susceptible to the party line group think believe Palin is what cost McCain the election. Btw, that's a line that the losers who were running McCain's campaign were more than happy to push in order deflect from the shitty job they did in running his campaign. It's why you, and plenty of your other fellow dumbfucks really believe Palin said she could see Russia from her house.2001400ex said:
No. McCain chose Palin. She knocked it out of the park at the convention. They were ahead. Just as your chart says. Then come the interviews...... And the rest is history. You have the charts to prove it.SFGbob said:
Yeah, that's probably the line I'd go with if I had just put my head up my ass.2001400ex said:
You are trying too hard.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
Dude, you can't even get your fucking facts straight and honestly recount something I said in a post that's staring your right in your stupid face. Do you really think anyone should rely on your worthless recollection of political events that occurred 10 years ago?
That being said. I know exactly what Palin said. And it was fucktarded. She fucked up a bunch of interviews. And McCain did fuck up the response to the financial crisis with his "I'm a leader and going to suspend my campaign" shit. There's a thousand reasons he lost and Palin was a part of that.
Look. I would fuck her as hard as you would. Mine would be a hate fucking while you probably want to lick her vagina while you blow your wad at the thought. So it's understandable why you can't accept she was part is the reason they lost.
I accept your surrender. -
Come watch hondo struggle in every thread isn't just a saying its a fact
-
Engrish please.RaceBannon said:Come watch hondo struggle in every thread isn't just a saying its a fact
-
See?
-
It was your dipshit pal.2001400ex said:
When did I say Palin was the sole reason? I said Palin has some shitty interviews and after that, their poll numbers declined. Fuck you are stupid.SFGbob said:
Goal posts are moving again. So Palin has gone from the reason McCain lost the election to one of thousand reasons McCain lost the campaign.2001400ex said:
True that was Race that posted the chart.. My bad for that. You did comment about it and argued that point.SFGbob said:
I didn't post a chart dumbass. Look I don't doubt that someone with your People Magazine level of political knowledge and sophistication was more swayed by what Palin said in an interview but right around the end of the second week of September you had the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and a nearly total meltdown of the financial markets. McCain's response to the crisis was disastrous but people who aren't very bright and who are susceptible to the party line group think believe Palin is what cost McCain the election. Btw, that's a line that the losers who were running McCain's campaign were more than happy to push in order deflect from the shitty job they did in running his campaign. It's why you, and plenty of your other fellow dumbfucks really believe Palin said she could see Russia from her house.2001400ex said:
No. McCain chose Palin. She knocked it out of the park at the convention. They were ahead. Just as your chart says. Then come the interviews...... And the rest is history. You have the charts to prove it.SFGbob said:
Yeah, that's probably the line I'd go with if I had just put my head up my ass.2001400ex said:
You are trying too hard.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
Dude, you can't even get your fucking facts straight and honestly recount something I said in a post that's staring your right in your stupid face. Do you really think anyone should rely on your worthless recollection of political events that occurred 10 years ago?
That being said. I know exactly what Palin said. And it was fucktarded. She fucked up a bunch of interviews. And McCain did fuck up the response to the financial crisis with his "I'm a leader and going to suspend my campaign" shit. There's a thousand reasons he lost and Palin was a part of that.
Look. I would fuck her as hard as you would. Mine would be a hate fucking while you probably want to lick her vagina while you blow your wad at the thought. So it's understandable why you can't accept she was part is the reason they lost.
I accept your surrender.
You blamed Palin for McCain's decline in the polls. So yes, you were solely blaming her.ThomasFremont said:I wouldn’t invite the person that cost me the presidency to my funeral either.
-
Am I Tommy?SFGbob said:
It was your dipshit pal.2001400ex said:
When did I say Palin was the sole reason? I said Palin has some shitty interviews and after that, their poll numbers declined. Fuck you are stupid.SFGbob said:
Goal posts are moving again. So Palin has gone from the reason McCain lost the election to one of thousand reasons McCain lost the campaign.2001400ex said:
True that was Race that posted the chart.. My bad for that. You did comment about it and argued that point.SFGbob said:
I didn't post a chart dumbass. Look I don't doubt that someone with your People Magazine level of political knowledge and sophistication was more swayed by what Palin said in an interview but right around the end of the second week of September you had the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and a nearly total meltdown of the financial markets. McCain's response to the crisis was disastrous but people who aren't very bright and who are susceptible to the party line group think believe Palin is what cost McCain the election. Btw, that's a line that the losers who were running McCain's campaign were more than happy to push in order deflect from the shitty job they did in running his campaign. It's why you, and plenty of your other fellow dumbfucks really believe Palin said she could see Russia from her house.2001400ex said:
No. McCain chose Palin. She knocked it out of the park at the convention. They were ahead. Just as your chart says. Then come the interviews...... And the rest is history. You have the charts to prove it.SFGbob said:
Yeah, that's probably the line I'd go with if I had just put my head up my ass.2001400ex said:
You are trying too hard.SFGbob said:
McCain didn't get the lead until after the Convention which was in September. Palin was announced on August 30th. The first time most people ever heard the "cunt" flapping her mouth was at the Convention. McCain surged out to a lead, the economic meltdown that had started months earlier became readily apparent, even to dumbasses like yourself by about the second week of September. That and McCain's response to it is what explains the decline in McCain's poll numbers not Palin.ThomasFremont said:
Huh?SFGbob said:
So you're both a liar and a dumbfuck too. The selection of Palin wasn't announced until the very end of August. The downward trend had nothing to do with Palin, she wasn't even on the ticket yet. But feel free to show us more of your ass.ThomasFremont said:That downward trend is Palin flapping her stupid cunt and the country collectively groaning.
You are correct about McCain getting a lead after the announcement (August). But then people asked who is Sarah Palin and the downward trend seen right above happened (September). Can you read? Or you just trying to be a TUFF guy. Won’t last long either way.
Dude, you can't even get your fucking facts straight and honestly recount something I said in a post that's staring your right in your stupid face. Do you really think anyone should rely on your worthless recollection of political events that occurred 10 years ago?
That being said. I know exactly what Palin said. And it was fucktarded. She fucked up a bunch of interviews. And McCain did fuck up the response to the financial crisis with his "I'm a leader and going to suspend my campaign" shit. There's a thousand reasons he lost and Palin was a part of that.
Look. I would fuck her as hard as you would. Mine would be a hate fucking while you probably want to lick her vagina while you blow your wad at the thought. So it's understandable why you can't accept she was part is the reason they lost.
I accept your surrender.
You blamed Palin for McCain's decline in the polls. So yes, you were solely blaming her.ThomasFremont said:I wouldn’t invite the person that cost me the presidency to my funeral either.
I see you figured out the quote feature. That's plus.
