OFFICIAL John McCain Imminent Couch Sale Thread
Comments
-
Watching you flail around in the wind is awesome.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I don't care if half the nation wants him impeached, if it isn't just, if he's done nothing wrong, then shut the fuck up, put on your big pants and offer a competing platform that isn't full of shit and fail. Show me 1 actual thing he's done that's illegal since becoming President. Where's the Russian collusion? Impeaching him will anger his supporters. Removing him from office just because they are the establishment and they hate him will end in the government being overthrown.2001400ex said:
I'm sure if the voters vote Democrats into Congress and Congress impeaches Trump. You'll have the same "voters will" sentiment. Right?oregonblitzkrieg said:McCain was a loser who lost to Obama, backstabbed America by helping to preserve Obamacare, and was an establishment hack who didn't get on board with the voter's will in choosing Trump to lead the nation. That's what he'll be remembered for.
As for McCain, like the others said, he might have been a war hero, but his service in the government is what he'll be remembered for. -
McCain's war imprisonment is what everyone loves but to me he was a politician. I have no use for politicians, I hope his family is handling his death OK.
-
T's & P's to his family. Meghan is sort of a looker.
-
She could stand to drop 30 lbs.oregonblitzkrieg said:T's & P's to his family. Meghan is sort of a looker.
-
The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
-
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
-
He is a capitalist and that’s close enough to a fiscal conservative for me. Everything he’s doing is the stuff he said he would do. I know having an elected official keep his campaign promises is disconcerting but you’ll get used to it.CirrhosisDawg said:
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
-
-
In the current political climate with socialism on the rise, we can't be picky.USMChawk said:
He is a capitalist and that’s close enoughCirrhosisDawg said:
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
to a fiscal conservativefor me. -
Tariffs & and an agenda of trade protectionism are capitalism? Those policies are straight out of the liberal playbook.USMChawk said:
He is a capitalist and that’s close enough to a fiscal conservative for me. Everything he’s doing is the stuff he said he would do. I know having an elected official keep his campaign promises is disconcerting but you’ll get used to it.CirrhosisDawg said:
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
Do you see now why trump loves the uneducated? -
It's almost as if there's an end game in mind and tariffs are just a negotiating tool to bring obstinate players to the table.CirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs & and an agenda of trade protectionism are capitalism? Those policies are straight out of the liberal playbook.USMChawk said:
He is a capitalist and that’s close enough to a fiscal conservative for me. Everything he’s doing is the stuff he said he would do. I know having an elected official keep his campaign promises is disconcerting but you’ll get used to it.CirrhosisDawg said:
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
Do you see now why trump loves the uneducated? -
So you do understand why trump loves the poorly educated.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It's almost as if there's an end game in mind and tariffs are just a negotiating tool to bring obstinate players to the table.CirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs & and an agenda of trade protectionism are capitalism? Those policies are straight out of the liberal playbook.USMChawk said:
He is a capitalist and that’s close enough to a fiscal conservative for me. Everything he’s doing is the stuff he said he would do. I know having an elected official keep his campaign promises is disconcerting but you’ll get used to it.CirrhosisDawg said:
Republican but not a conservative? Just like trump then.USMChawk said:The lefts reaction to McCain’s death is in stark contrast to their reaction to Barbara Bush’s death, a few months ago. That tells you all you need to know about his politics. He was a Republican but he was no conservative.
Do you see now why trump loves the uneducated? -
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it? -
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal. -
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal. -
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated. -
Larry Fitzgerald with a propaganda piece supporting john McCain on the sideline. The NFL is just about dead.
-
Great deflection retard. I accept your concession.phineas said:Larry Fitzgerald with a propaganda piece supporting john McCain on the sideline. The NFL is just about dead.
-
Deflection from what? Have I even been in this thread? Get your shit together you weird old faggot.CirrhosisDawg said:
Great deflection retard. I accept your concession.phineas said:Larry Fitzgerald with a propaganda piece supporting john McCain on the sideline. The NFL is just about dead.
-
Sorry! I didn’t understand how angry you are.phineas said:
Deflection from what? Have I even been in this thread? Get your shit together you weird old faggot.CirrhosisDawg said:
Great deflection retard. I accept your concession.phineas said:Larry Fitzgerald with a propaganda piece supporting john McCain on the sideline. The NFL is just about dead.
Horrible news about the nfl. I know you are disappointed.
Wel’ll catch up later. K? -
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it. -
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake and for no other reason. You're just a common punk. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Do you keep a photograph of Xi Jinping in your wallet? -
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.CirrhosisDawg said:
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...USMChawk said:
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.CirrhosisDawg said:
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
Cirrho would rather see the US take it up the butt from China than dare to ever call them out on their nasty trade practices and even the playing field. He likes it when Europe, Canada and Mexico get in on the gang bang.
-
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...USMChawk said:
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.CirrhosisDawg said:
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
The US has always led and dominated global trade. Profited hugely from it too. The most highly educated and skilled always win. US global economic dominance for the past 70 years, up until now, regardless of politics, has been built upon open markets and free trade.
Now, in 2018, the US needs to proceed through a generation of useless unskilled labor. Demographics need not be mentioned, but we all know. We told you 20 years go back to tech school. You didn’t listen. Good news! We have a program for you. It’s called welfare. Get used to it because even with your obese orangutan leader, you still cannot impede the laws of economics and capitalism.
-
Free trade is fine. When other countries play by the rules. They aren't. That's what you're not getting, and you're too thick to see that tariffs are a great way to bring these trade abusers to the table.CirrhosisDawg said:The US has always led and dominated global trade. Profited hugely from it too. The most highly educated and skilled always win. US global economic dominance for the past 70 years, up until now, regardless of politics, has been built upon open markets and free trade.
Now, in 2018, the US needs to proceed through a generation of useless unskilled labor. Demographics need not be mentioned, but we all know. We told you 20 years go back to tech school. You didn’t listen. Good news! We have a program for you. It’s called welfare. Get used to it because even with your obese orangutan leader, you still cannot impede the laws of economics and capitalism.
