Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Locker, Price or Browning

1…7891113

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,673
    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016

    with tui for sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,527 Founders Club
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016

    Locker is like crack for doogs potd
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,673
    edited August 2018
    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster? UW is 10 times better at every position these last two years except at QB

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,673
    edited August 2018
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.

    He had brass balls and was super fun to watch when he was on. He was mostly a shit QB though. And there's no chance Pete would have ever handed him his offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,673
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.


    Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.


    Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

    You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter