Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster? UW is 10 times better at every position these last two years except at QB
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
He had brass balls and was super fun to watch when he was on. He was mostly a shit QB though. And there's no chance Pete would have ever handed him his offense.
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
Fuck off. Locker never had this much talent surrounding him. A one legged Locker beats ASU and Stanford last year.
Without Locker in the late aughts UW was a fucking 0-12 team, every year.
Im not even a huge Locker fan but he is better than Browning.
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
Sadly @Babushka would have been a hugely improvement from the QB coaching he got at Ferndale and whatever minor Huard was the GA QB coach for Willingsham.
Comments
You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster? UW is 10 times better at every position these last two years except at QB
And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.
You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.
Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
He had brass balls and was super fun to watch when he was on. He was mostly a shit QB though. And there's no chance Pete would have ever handed him his offense.
Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
Speaks volumes
Fuck off. Locker never had this much talent surrounding him. A one legged Locker beats ASU and Stanford last year.
Without Locker in the late aughts UW was a fucking 0-12 team, every year.
Im not even a huge Locker fan but he is better than Browning.
same thread that gets made every few months or so
maybe we can debate locker's legacy and skillset into eternity
can't wait
Apparently they do because this is a 6 page thread and youre checking it every 10 minutes
Which is fine, there is nothing else to discuss for a little over a week
If only @Babushka could have gotten ahold of him!