Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Locker, Price or Browning

124

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Mosster47 said:

    I'd marry Locker, fuck Price, and kill Browning.


    That's what this shit thread was asking, right?

    ooybe
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    dnc said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    dnc said:

    creepycoug said:

    LoneStarDawg said:

    Stanback and locker were the same QB, only racists (and titan GM) will disagree with me

    Very true. And when I used to point that out, I'd get railed like a Nazi on a French whore.

    Arguably an even better athlete. 10.4 and a cannon for an arm.
    Better athlete but still wasn't as good of a runner as Jake.

    His arm was unreal though.
    See 2:09

    https://youtu.be/ywcD94gqxQM
    Something I never realized as many times as I've seen that play is IS threw that ball from the pocket. Most of the time QB's rollout to the Hail Mary side of the field before throwing it, especially on such a long one when they a) need to buy more time and b) need to get every yard they can out of their arm.

    Stanback threw that ball from 25 yard line dead center of the field to damn near the sidelines on the opposite 5 yard.

    Fucking cannon.
    That win came out of nowhere, UW actually beat Arizona by a few scores. Definitely rode the momentum of that throw.

    UW is probably bowl eligible if IS doesn't tear his leg against Oregon State in 2006. That probably avoided a contract extension for Ty though, so it evened out I guess. Still one of the biggest wastes of talent in recent memory.
    Legendary tailback (and 12th man!) James Sims took over the second half IIRC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Caught something on the play on that Hail Mary video right after IS's throw I never noticed either.

    Notice the scoreboard on the screen. lol


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,678 Swaye's Wigwam
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    dnc said:

    creepycoug said:

    LoneStarDawg said:

    Stanback and locker were the same QB, only racists (and titan GM) will disagree with me

    Very true. And when I used to point that out, I'd get railed like a Nazi on a French whore.

    Arguably an even better athlete. 10.4 and a cannon for an arm.
    Better athlete but still wasn't as good of a runner as Jake.

    His arm was unreal though.
    See 2:09

    https://youtu.be/ywcD94gqxQM
    I don't know how that wasn't #1. All the other throws in the vid were 20 yards shorter and mostly slop. IS hit him in the face, in stride, from about 75 yards. I know there's some luck involved, but it would be hard to find a better throw than that one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,726 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    steelheader2 said:

    You guys think way too highly of Price. When things were going well he strutted around waving his finger. When he got hit and we were getting killed by 30(routine) he limped around and had shitty body language.

    Beating the Auburn/Bama of the world takes 2 things on O. Mobile qb and a big wideout who can get 50/50 balls. See Manziel, Watson etc. Your qb is going to get pressured so he better have an outlet he can throw it to who can make that 50/50 catch. Ty Jones can hopefully be that guy and looked like it in scrimmage I attended. Locker would keep Auburn off balance with run and can throw deep ball enough to keep them honest. Imagine Locker, Gaskin and Ahmed in backfield with Chico on fly sweeps. Would make Auburn defend the whole field.



    SyphilisButter said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Locker is a doog legend. Price is a HHB version of a doog legend. It's amazing that a giy who never won shit, wasn't a hard worker, and had very little natural talent is so revered by the group of fans who pretend tm have such high expectations. The Cal game in 2011 meant that much to you? Browning is shit. They all suck.

    You are what your record shows. Browning has won more games and has the best single season, by far. Those are the facts.

    No way man imagine Browning on those kp teams

    Now imagine kp here now

    Get it?
    thinking of locker on this team sounds like a formula for 7-6 to me. you jock sniffers for locker are amazing. nobody is saying price is great, but locker sucked.
    https://youtu.be/hnMFCBm-MOY

    Now you're messing with a, a son of a bitch!
    I'm wasted in Nashville bandb can't stop watching this video. Jake fucked people up with his deceptive side to side. Damn I'm glad he didn't go to Oregon because under chip they would have popped off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016

    with tui for sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016

    Locker is like crack for doogs potd
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    edited August 2018
    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster? UW is 10 times better at every position these last two years except at QB

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    edited August 2018
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.

    He had brass balls and was super fun to watch when he was on. He was mostly a shit QB though. And there's no chance Pete would have ever handed him his offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.


    Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.


    Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

    You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    So now we are comparing Lockner to Browning to make him look good

    Speaks volumes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

    You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?

    There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

    And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
    Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

    The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

    You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

    Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
    Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.


    Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

    You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.

    Fuck off. Locker never had this much talent surrounding him. A one legged Locker beats ASU and Stanford last year.

    Without Locker in the late aughts UW was a fucking 0-12 team, every year.

    Im not even a huge Locker fan but he is better than Browning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    RaceBannon said:

    So now we are comparing Lockner to Browning to make him look good

    Speaks volumes

    Price >>> Locker >>> Browning
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So now we are comparing Lockner to Browning to make him look good

    Speaks volumes

    Price >>> Locker >>> Browning
    NOC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,201
    RaceBannon said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So now we are comparing Lockner to Browning to make him look good

    Speaks volumes

    Price >>> Locker >>> Browning
    NOC

    Apparently they do because this is a 6 page thread and youre checking it every 10 minutes

    Which is fine, there is nothing else to discuss for a little over a week
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.

    You're right, of course.

    If only @Babushka could have gotten ahold of him!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.

    You're right, of course.

    If only @Babushka could have gotten ahold of him!
    Sadly @Babushka would have been a hugely improvement from the QB coaching he got at Ferndale and whatever minor Huard was the GA QB coach for Willingsham.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,726 Founders Club
    Gladstone said:

    6 pages

    same thread that gets made every few months or so

    maybe we can debate locker's legacy and skillset into eternity

    can't wait

    I'll fucking do it if I have to!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter