Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tosh Lupoi wants to stay, but...

13

Comments

  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,764
    We need coaches who can recruit or recruiters who can coach.

    Tosh is a fucking unreliable asshole. Who gives a fuck who he brings here if he is a coaching liability.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.
    Tosh is a recruiter, first and foremost. "Recruiter" should be a title on the coaching staff, but it isn't. Baird was a Recruiter, not a coach. Recruiting is a full time job, 24x7x365. If you get any coaching out of a guy that will recruit 24x7x365, it's a bonus. It's relentless, it's exhausting. HC's can't do it, and do their job as HC.

    Tosh should decide on "Who can develop my recruits? Sark, or Petersen? We've seen that Sark can't develop shit. Petersen was ALL development at BSJC. What can Petersen do with top recruits? A LOT MORE THAN SARK CAN!


    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,764
    death2ducks said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.
    Tosh is a recruiter, first and foremost. "Recruiter" should be a title on the coaching staff, but it isn't. Baird was a Recruiter, not a coach. Recruiting is a full time job, 24x7x365. If you get any coaching out of a guy that will recruit 24x7x365, it's a bonus. It's relentless, it's exhausting. HC's can't do it, and do their job as HC.

    Tosh should decide on "Who can develop my recruits? Sark, or Petersen? We've seen that Sark can't develop shit. Petersen was ALL development at BSJC. What can Petersen do with top recruits? A LOT MORE THAN SARK CAN!


    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator toothbrush), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited December 2013
    death2ducks said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.
    Tosh is a recruiter, first and foremost. "Recruiter" should be a title on the coaching staff, but it isn't. Baird was a Recruiter, not a coach. Recruiting is a full time job, 24x7x365. If you get any coaching out of a guy that will recruit 24x7x365, it's a bonus. It's relentless, it's exhausting. HC's can't do it, and do their job as HC.

    Tosh should decide on "Who can develop my recruits? Sark, or Petersen? We've seen that Sark can't develop shit. Petersen was ALL development at BSJC. What can Petersen do with top recruits? A LOT MORE THAN SARK CAN!


    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    Only a political party that elected george dubbya bush and created the tea party could ask this question.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    edited December 2013
    Passion said:

    death2ducks said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.
    Tosh is a recruiter, first and foremost. "Recruiter" should be a title on the coaching staff, but it isn't. Baird was a Recruiter, not a coach. Recruiting is a full time job, 24x7x365. If you get any coaching out of a guy that will recruit 24x7x365, it's a bonus. It's relentless, it's exhausting. HC's can't do it, and do their job as HC.

    Tosh should decide on "Who can develop my recruits? Sark, or Petersen? We've seen that Sark can't develop shit. Petersen was ALL development at BSJC. What can Petersen do with top recruits? A LOT MORE THAN SARK CAN!


    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    Only a political party that elected george dubbya bush and created the tea party could ask this question.

    I didn't do either asswipe. But keep using debate techniques also used by your grandchildren.

    Now try and answer my fucking question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Passion said:


    death2ducks said:


    He_Needs_More_Time said:


    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.

    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    Only a political party that elected george dubbya bush and created the tea party could ask this question.

    If y'all are going to bash on moms in tennis shoes, and grandpas in powered whigs, I'm out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited December 2013
    death2ducks said:

    Passion said:

    death2ducks said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fuck him

    That's my stance too. His teams were average at Cal and UW. I don't get why so many think he's a good coach.
    Tosh is a recruiter, first and foremost. "Recruiter" should be a title on the coaching staff, but it isn't. Baird was a Recruiter, not a coach. Recruiting is a full time job, 24x7x365. If you get any coaching out of a guy that will recruit 24x7x365, it's a bonus. It's relentless, it's exhausting. HC's can't do it, and do their job as HC.

    Tosh should decide on "Who can develop my recruits? Sark, or Petersen? We've seen that Sark can't develop shit. Petersen was ALL development at BSJC. What can Petersen do with top recruits? A LOT MORE THAN SARK CAN!


    How can democrats put this woman, (who barely graduated from WAZZU and can't use a calculator), in charge of the $3 Trillion Budget?
    Only a political party that elected george dubbya bush and created the tea party could ask this question.

    I didn't do either asswipe. But keep using debate techniques also used by your grandchildren.

    Now try and answer my fucking question.
    Why not answer your question? I'll tell you in a minute.

    Patty Murray just negotiated a budget deal that had the strong approval of the republican speaker of the house (boehner, since you probably don't know), and the chairman of the house budget committee - paul ryan, a hero of far-right conservatives. Even though she "can't use a calculator," the republican-led house approved the Murray-Ryan budget 332-94.

    If the Senate passes the budget (over the objections of rubio and cruz on the right, and liberals on the far left), it will be the first time that Congress has passed a budget in three years, and the first time that a divided Congress has passed a budget in even longer.

    Yet your assertion that Democrats should not put "this woman" in charge of the budget talks is based on an unflattering photo, and some stupid comment about her college education.

    So "asswipe," why not answer your "fucking" question? Because you're not worth engaging. It would be a waste of my time.

    The best thing you can do for society is go for a long drive on a windy mountain road, and hit the accelerator when you approach a hairpin turn.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    Great thread you idiots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter