Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

relevant then relevant now

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club
    Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,214

    Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.

    Needed more tim
  • SyphilisButter
    SyphilisButter Member Posts: 221

    Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.

    pete 4-2 against uo
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.

    pete 4-2 against uo
    Yeah, but still
  • SyphilisButter
    SyphilisButter Member Posts: 221
    cool bro

    how about oregon
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    cool bro

    how about oregon

    Irrelevant. Just like Peterman’s record at Boise.
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,297
    Herbert has never earned even an honorable mention all Pac-12
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,030 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.

    pete 4-2 against uo
    Don James was 1-2 against San Diego State.
    fAKE NEWS
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
    meh

    no showed when it actually mattered, as per sark's norm

    L 28-31 furd,
    L 24-45 UO,
    L 24-53 @ ASU (LOL, 1/2 were garbage points).



  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,214
    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.


    It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,030 Founders Club
    Sark is better than Ty?
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,338 Founders Club

    Sark is better than Ty?

    Hot take - big if true.
  • GrandpaSankey
    GrandpaSankey Member Posts: 958

    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.


    It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey
    Even I can see this white boy knows his shit.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.


    It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey



    He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.

  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    Gladstone said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
    meh

    no showed when it actually mattered, as per sark's norm

    L 28-31 furd,
    L 24-45 UO,
    L 24-53 @ ASU (LOL, 1/2 were garbage points).



    I was talking about scheme and not personnel. Giving up 45 and 53 are bigger problems than only scoring 24.

    And I hate to be a buzzkill, but:

    L 13-26 USC '16
    L 7-24 Bama '16
    L 7-13 ASU '17
    L 22-30 Stanford '17
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,214
    AIRWOLF said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.


    It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey



    He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.


    Against Oregon and ASU it was hero ball with Price
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    AIRWOLF said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...

    I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensible
    The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.

    If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.

    Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.


    It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey



    He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.


    Against Oregon and ASU it was hero ball with Price
    Well, it was still Sark calling plays. My point was that the offensive scheme was simple and concise.