relevant then relevant now

Comments
-
Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
-
Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
Needed more timYellowSnow said:Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
-
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
-
pete 4-2 against uoYellowSnow said:Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
Yeah, but stillSyphilisButter said:
pete 4-2 against uoYellowSnow said:Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
Don James was 1-2 against San Diego State.SyphilisButter said:
pete 4-2 against uoYellowSnow said:Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
cool bro
how about oregon -
Irrelevant. Just like Peterman’s record at Boise.SyphilisButter said:cool bro
how about oregon
-
Is Peterson a better coach than Helfrich? It’s possible.
-
Herbert has never earned even an honorable mention all Pac-12
-
fAKE NEWSAZDuck said:
Don James was 1-2 against San Diego State.SyphilisButter said:
pete 4-2 against uoYellowSnow said:Sling blade was 2-1 against Pete. People forget this.
-
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's. -
mehAIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
no showed when it actually mattered, as per sark's norm
L 28-31 furd,
L 24-45 UO,
L 24-53 @ ASU (LOL, 1/2 were garbage points).
-
AIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey -
Sark is better than Ty?
-
Hot take - big if true.RaceBannon said:Sark is better than Ty?
-
Even I can see this white boy knows his shit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:AIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey
He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.
-
I was talking about scheme and not personnel. Giving up 45 and 53 are bigger problems than only scoring 24.Gladstone said:
mehAIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
no showed when it actually mattered, as per sark's norm
L 28-31 furd,
L 24-45 UO,
L 24-53 @ ASU (LOL, 1/2 were garbage points).
And I hate to be a buzzkill, but:
L 13-26 USC '16
L 7-24 Bama '16
L 7-13 ASU '17
L 22-30 Stanford '17 -
AIRWOLF said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:AIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey
He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.
Against Oregon and ASU it was hero ball with Price -
Well, it was still Sark calling plays. My point was that the offensive scheme was simple and concise.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AIRWOLF said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:AIRWOLF said:
The 2013 offense was the best one the Huskies have had since Tui graduated. And I am not just talking about statistically.RaceBannon said:
I recall he added some elements of it to his bag of shitshow offense making it even more incomprehensibleDerekJohnson said:Sark copied the Oregon offense.... think about that...
If Petersen's OCs ran something more like it, we'd win more games.
Sark sucked in A LOT of ways. But the 2013 offensive blueprint was easily the best thing he ever did. And really, it was Eric Kiesau's more than Sark's.
It still relied too much on bullshit dink and dunks and not enough on Bishop Sankey
He got the ball 27 times a game, including receptions.
Against Oregon and ASU it was hero ball with Price