Cavs Gonna Cav
Comments
-
I don't think the signing is as bad as it appears at first blush. They kept the one tradeable asset they have and his numbers are going to be inflated next season. I would be shocked if he's there more than the next 1.5 years.
Also, teams have to hit a minimum threshold for spending against the cap (90%). They have room for the 19-20 season, and basically nobody aside from Love committed beyond then. No big name FA's are going to sign there. -
Y'all just haters on the crackers. You have NO idea what Kevin Love went through growing up on the mean streets of Lake Oswego. None.
-
We? spent every other Christmas in Lake O growing up. My uncle lived there on the golf course
#ThugLife -
hes on a 5 year deal, that's the point. if they didn't extend him there would be a clock ticking on how much time they had left to trade him. now they have 5 years to decide what to do
if the clippers can trade blake griffin after signing him to an albatross, kevin love can (and probably will) be traded -
Blake Griffin is damaged goods, but he's still a lot better than Kevin Love.Gladstone said:hes on a 5 year deal, that's the point. if they didn't extend him there would be a clock ticking on how much time they had left to trade him. now they have 5 years to decide what to do
if the clippers can trade blake griffin after signing him to an albatross, kevin love can (and probably will) be traded -
They already have a lot of bad contracts. JR Smith, Tristan Thompson, George Hill, Clarkson, Korver, etc. They are years away from hitting the minimum.BleachedAnusDawg said:I don't think the signing is as bad as it appears at first blush. They kept the one tradeable asset they have and his numbers are going to be inflated next season. I would be shocked if he's there more than the next 1.5 years.
Also, teams have to hit a minimum threshold for spending against the cap (90%). They have room for the 19-20 season, and basically nobody aside from Love committed beyond then. No big name FA's are going to sign there.
They should tank. Instead they will win 35-40 games this year and be in the late lottery. -
They're not winning 40 games.RoadDawg55 said:
They already have a lot of bad contracts. JR Smith, Tristan Thompson, George Hill, Clarkson, Korver, etc. They are years away from hitting the minimum.BleachedAnusDawg said:I don't think the signing is as bad as it appears at first blush. They kept the one tradeable asset they have and his numbers are going to be inflated next season. I would be shocked if he's there more than the next 1.5 years.
Also, teams have to hit a minimum threshold for spending against the cap (90%). They have room for the 19-20 season, and basically nobody aside from Love committed beyond then. No big name FA's are going to sign there.
They should tank. Instead they will win 35-40 games this year and be in the late lottery.
I'd set the O/U at 30.
Agree they should tank. -
Now that LeBron is gone, who cares?
-
Good pointThomasFremont said:Now that LeBron is gone, who cares?
-
Those contracts come off the books by 2020. If they keep Love for the full length of his new deal they'll have a bunch of rookie/mid-level deals around him and be nowhere close to the 90% spending rule. That's why his deal isn't that bad.RoadDawg55 said:
They already have a lot of bad contracts. JR Smith, Tristan Thompson, George Hill, Clarkson, Korver, etc. They are years away from hitting the minimum.BleachedAnusDawg said:I don't think the signing is as bad as it appears at first blush. They kept the one tradeable asset they have and his numbers are going to be inflated next season. I would be shocked if he's there more than the next 1.5 years.
Also, teams have to hit a minimum threshold for spending against the cap (90%). They have room for the 19-20 season, and basically nobody aside from Love committed beyond then. No big name FA's are going to sign there.
They should tank. Instead they will win 35-40 games this year and be in the late lottery.
But really, he's going to get traded this season after he puts up a 23/12/5 line.
