Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why does the fucking retarded Pac-10 media think we will win the P12?

2»

Comments

  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    edited July 2018
    Time Of Possession. Bush Hamdan will revamp the offense I'm sure of it!
    You guys underestimate how detrimental Johnathan 'a bubble screen is a pass play' Babushka is to the confidence of an offense. With Hamdan back you're going to see some Tedford level intuitive play calling that will bring Cobra back to his rightful place on the throne.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Gwad said:

    You guys underestimate how detrimental Johnathan 'a bubble screen is a pass play' Babushka is to the confidence of an offense. With Hamdan back you're going to see some Tedford level intuitive play calling that will bring Cobra back to his rightful place on the throne.

    Lipo in Hamdan, I got a feeling we are going to hate his fucking guts by second quarter of the auburn game
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Jake Browning: best player on the field.

    Mosster47 said:

    My true answer this is because of conference dreck.

    Stanford is usually always picked second because of their high number of try hard whites.

    SC is starting a 17 year old QB and weren't very good with a 1st round QB.

    Oregon is on their third coach in three years.

    Everyone else is just a cannon fodder program so they're never getting first place votes.

    We? are going to lose five:

    @ Auburn
    @ Utah
    @ UCLA
    @ Oregon
    Stanford

    I could easily see losses to ASU and @ Cal.

    We?'ll be lucky to make a bowl game.
    I think you'll beat UCLA and Utah.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Jake Browning: best player on the field.

    Swaye said:

    Mosster47 said:

    My true answer this is because of conference dreck.

    Stanford is usually always picked second because of their high number of try hard whites.

    SC is starting a 17 year old QB and weren't very good with a 1st round QB.

    Oregon is on their third coach in three years.

    Everyone else is just a cannon fodder program so they're never getting first place votes.

    We? are going to lose five:

    @ Auburn
    @ Utah
    @ UCLA
    @ Oregon
    Stanford

    I could easily see losses to ASU and @ Cal.

    We?'ll be lucky to make a bowl game.
    Actually mostly agree except I bet we smash Furd. Oregon is a toss up because we don;t really know what Cristoball is all about, though early returns suggest he is Sark squared.

    Auburn is going to buttfuck us on national TV though. That's a given. Utah is due, and we never beat UCLA. That's three for sure.
    We're going to push Stanford's shit in. Cook it. Same with ASU.

    Auburn is a winnable game, but I feel like shit about it because we're still Beta Men until we're not.

    We'll go 2-1 against Utah, Oregon and Utah. Don't know which one yet. You'll have to wait for Yella's pre season spectacular which comes out early November like Pup's.
    You'll lose to Stanford and ASU.
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    Write In:

    Because we upgraded our OC by getting rid of Smith.
  • guntlove
    guntlove Member Posts: 784
    Swaye said:

    Mosster47 said:

    My true answer this is because of conference dreck.

    Stanford is usually always picked second because of their high number of try hard whites.

    SC is starting a 17 year old QB and weren't very good with a 1st round QB.

    Oregon is on their third coach in three years.

    Everyone else is just a cannon fodder program so they're never getting first place votes.

    We? are going to lose five:

    @ Auburn
    @ Utah
    @ UCLA
    @ Oregon
    Stanford

    I could easily see losses to ASU and @ Cal.

    We?'ll be lucky to make a bowl game.
    Actually mostly agree except I bet we smash Furd. Oregon is a toss up because we don;t really know what Cristoball is all about, though early returns suggest he is Sark squared.

    Auburn is going to buttfuck us on national TV though. That's a given. Utah is due, and we never beat UCLA. That's three for sure.
    Yeah, I stand with Swaye on Furd, but I also think we'll? beat UCLA.

    I'm guessing 9-3... with a skullfucking at the hands of Auburn, a loss to Ooootah, and bedshitting on the road to Whoregon.

    Too many holes in recruiting leading up to last years class... specifically at WR, QB, Buck, and the interior OL. It's gonna catch up with us this year and next. If we? put a couple more classes together like the one we pulled in last year, then we'll be in fucking business and 2048 will be special.

    gunt.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Actually we are better than Stanford because we just are and us losing at ASU was just a random piece of BAD LUCK!!
    guntlove said:

    Swaye said:

    Mosster47 said:

    My true answer this is because of conference dreck.

    Stanford is usually always picked second because of their high number of try hard whites.

    SC is starting a 17 year old QB and weren't very good with a 1st round QB.

    Oregon is on their third coach in three years.

    Everyone else is just a cannon fodder program so they're never getting first place votes.

    We? are going to lose five:

    @ Auburn
    @ Utah
    @ UCLA
    @ Oregon
    Stanford

    I could easily see losses to ASU and @ Cal.

    We?'ll be lucky to make a bowl game.
    Actually mostly agree except I bet we smash Furd. Oregon is a toss up because we don;t really know what Cristoball is all about, though early returns suggest he is Sark squared.

    Auburn is going to buttfuck us on national TV though. That's a given. Utah is due, and we never beat UCLA. That's three for sure.
    Yeah, I stand with Swaye on Furd, but I also think we'll? beat UCLA.

    I'm guessing 9-3... with a skullfucking at the hands of Auburn, a loss to Ooootah, and bedshitting on the road to Whoregon.

    Too many holes in recruiting leading up to last years class... specifically at WR, QB, Buck, and the interior OL. It's gonna catch up with us this year and next. If we? put a couple more classes together like the one we pulled in last year, then we'll be in fucking business and 2048 will be special.

    gunt.
    That's very realistic. If three winnable games were on the OOC slate I don't think anyone would argue with 10 regular season wins. This is the best team Auburn has had since 2004.
  • longduckdong
    longduckdong Member Posts: 1,057

    The fact that we didn't win the north last year and we are being picked to win anything is FS. We are fucking losers and Jake Browning is a loser winner. But even he can't change the fact that this season is going to be a curl up job after we get broken in half by Auburn.

    I don't get why people think we are going to win anything this year. WE LOST THE P12N TO FUCKING STANFORD LAST YEAR. AND STANFORD LOST TO SDSU!

    Christ, just enough with this shit. Our 'big time' wins in the past two glory seasons are beating... wait for it... Stanford at home... and I guess beating Colorado?

    WOOHOO!!! WE ARE FUCKING BIG TIME.

    If team A beat team B but lost to team C.
    Doesn't work that way Dennis.
  • JaWarrenJaHooker
    JaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,122
    Gladstone said:
    What positions do Junior Nickleback and Jeez Louise play
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Gaines is certainly not meh worthy but not having Vea besides him will cut down on his production certainly.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Jake Browning: best player on the field.
    salemcoog said:

    Gaines is certainly not meh worthy but not having Vea besides him will cut down on his production certainly.
    Certainly
  • Babushka
    Babushka Member Posts: 211

    Gladstone said:
    What positions do Junior Nickleback and Jeez Louise play
    Strong safetyman
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Jake Browning: best player on the field.
    As for a serious answer to the querey, it's pretty fucking simple. UW is the safest pick out there. You can imagine things breaking in such a way that Stanford or SC or even Utah or Arizona end up as conference champs, but you can also imagine any of those teams dropping four games in conference. UW isn't losing more than 2 games in the Pac season unless total disaster strikes. They're easily the safest bet, which makes them the best bet.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Actually we are better than Stanford because we just are and us losing at ASU was just a random piece of BAD LUCK!!
    dnc said:

    As for a serious answer to the querey, it's pretty fucking simple. UW is the safest pick out there. You can imagine things breaking in such a way that Stanford or SC or even Utah or Arizona end up as conference champs, but you can also imagine any of those teams dropping four games in conference. UW isn't losing more than 2 games in the Pac season unless total disaster strikes. They're easily the safest bet, which makes them the best bet.

    Agreed there. There isn't a lot of great, but there is good everywhere.

    No one west of Rockies is going to hold what's about to happen in Atlanta against you guys as everyone's team would take the same ass pounding, but I need to see BBK defend the run now that he has to shed a block on every play before he makes a tackle. A guy that commands a double team is really rare and makes your overall D so much better. A killer secondary doesn't do much if you can't stop the run.