Taped Trump conversation
Comments
-
Federal prosecutors in possession of 12 additional tapes with hours of Trump-Cohen phone conversations. Wonder what’s in them!
DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE AND DEATH ??
Troomps are right. This is bigger than watergate! -
Fuck.Dude61 said:
Your projecting.dflea said:
He does get blowjobs for free.WilburHooksHands said:
Nothing says alpha like paying for sex.pawz said:
And?WilburHooksHands said:
ftfyDude61 said:Trump pays huge amounts of money to bang hot chicks.
Tell us something we don't know.
From Dud61, but still.
You should come out of the closet. -
Hey, hey, hey.RaceBannon said:So your attorney can secretly tape privileged conversation with a client and release it?
Not in my America
Traitors
I'll do the pretend legal analysis around here buddy boy. You stick with construction and real estate and ancient history you've witnessed. Those are your areas; this is mine. -
It's usually not a per se violation to secretly tape or record; what is at play under most statutes is whether evidence obtained therefrom is admissible as evidence in court. Which is usually the issue.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not all conversations with your attorney are privileged. Only when seeking and providing legal advice.RaceBannon said:So your attorney can secretly tape privileged conversation with a client and release it?
Not in my America
Traitors
Also taping people without their consent varies state by state. I don’t know what New York’s laws regarding that are. -
struggling here. what's the problem again?ThomasFremont said:
Question: how is Trump fucking hot chicks “winning” for anyone besides Trump? In no way does this help anyone else.PurpleThrobber said:
Soooo fucking hot. I'd be on Good Morning America bragging about nailing that. Holy shit.
So much winning.
btw, @oregonblitzkrieg google is awesome. Image search "Karen McDougal Nude". Videos are solid as well.
He’s supposed to be leading the free world, but all he wants to do is fuck, golf, and eat fast food. He could have done that as a private citizen and NOGAF. Now it raises questions about how much he is compromised. Especially if he has to arrange for hush money. -
Not my area, but I was discussing this with one of my other pretend lawyers when it came out.RaceBannon said:Just to get you lawyers on record
You think paying a playmate is a crime that allows the government to raid your attorney's office and for your attorney to tape you secretly and turn it over?
The same folks behind the Patriot Act are behind this coup attempt by the way
Mueller is all yours. Be proud
The issue, in theory, was that if his lawyer was paying this chick off, it would be a technical violation of campaign finance in that the payoff, given the timing, was ostensibly to keep it out of the news during the election.
I have no idea if that has any teeth, and if it turns out he paid her directly out of his own funds, and not dummy's, then no, I don't see the issue. Companies pay money to severed employees all the tim to keep their mouths shut. -
The campaign portion is a stretch based on John Edwards who didn't have his own hush money
I didn't like it when the Feds went after Gotti's lawyer after losing to him three times. They got him thrown off the case they finally won -
There is a certain degree of protection that the attorney-client relationship is, and should be afforded.RaceBannon said:The campaign portion is a stretch based on John Edwards who didn't have his own hush money
I didn't like it when the Feds went after Gotti's lawyer after losing to him three times. They got him thrown off the case they finally won
Note, however, there are exceptions to break the privilege. That, in and of itself, is whole area that litigators specialize in. One of the exceptions is commission of a crime. Generally, if the client was in the process of committing a crime or fraud, or intended to do so, and communicated with his lawyer with intent to further that goal, then you breach the privilege.
But, yeah, I'm not a fan of the bully fed. Where that's useful is in situations where regional bias is truly perpetrating injustice, ie, civil rights era intervention in the knuckle-dragging souf. When your FUCKING GOVERNOR stands at your state flagship university and attempts to block entrance to a black girl wanting an education, then you have no reasonable shot at justice in that region and the feds can help.
But like all power, it's easy to abuse.
-
I see no shame in paying for it if you are su
Last time I got off for murder I told my lawyer I didn't do it. Case closed.creepycoug said:
There is a certain degree of protection that the attorney-client relationship is, and should be afforded.RaceBannon said:The campaign portion is a stretch based on John Edwards who didn't have his own hush money
I didn't like it when the Feds went after Gotti's lawyer after losing to him three times. They got him thrown off the case they finally won
Note, however, there are exceptions to break the privilege. That, in and of itself, is whole area that litigators specialize in. One of the exceptions is commission of a crime. Generally, if the client was in the process of committing a crime or fraud, or intended to do so, and communicated with his lawyer with intent to further that goal, then you breach the privilege.
But, yeah, I'm not a fan of the bully fed. Where that's useful is in situations where regional bias is truly perpetrating injustice, ie, civil rights era intervention in the knuckle-dragging souf. When your FUCKING GOVERNOR stands at your state flagship university and attempts to block entrance to a black girl wanting an education, then you have no reasonable shot at justice in that region and the feds can help.
But like all power, it's easy to abuse. -
So it turns out that Trump isn't going to claim privilege. Interesting. Or not
